Patel Preeya J, Weidenfeller Christian, Jones Andrew P, Nilsson Jens, Hsu Jay
Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Europe Ltd, London, UK.
Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Fort Lee, NJ, USA.
Neurol Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):121-147. doi: 10.1007/s40120-020-00221-4. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
A post hoc analysis of a double-blind (DB) active control trial and an open-label extension (OLE) study was conducted to evaluate the long-term effects of lurasidone in patients with schizophrenia.
In the DB trial, patients were randomised to receive lurasidone or risperidone for 12 months. In OLE, all patients received lurasidone for an additional 6 months. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated. Efficacy assessments included relapse rate (DB trial only), and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale, and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale.
In the DB trial, patients with schizophrenia were randomised to lurasidone (n = 399) and risperidone (n = 190), of whom 129 and 84 continued into OLE, respectively. During the DB trial, incidence of TEAEs was similar for lurasidone (84.1%) and risperidone (84.2%). Lurasidone was associated with minimal changes in metabolic variables and prolactin levels, whereas risperidone was associated with clinically significant increases in prolactin and fasting glucose levels. The proportion of patients with metabolic syndrome was significantly lower in patients treated with lurasidone versus risperidone at the end of the DB trial (25.5% vs 40.4%; p = 0.0177). During OLE, patients switching from risperidone to lurasidone experienced a reduction in weight and prolactin levels; those continuing treatment with lurasidone experienced minimal changes in metabolic variables and prolactin. At the end of OLE, the proportion of patients with metabolic syndrome was no longer significantly different between groups (23.5% vs 31.5%; p = not significant). Efficacy outcomes were generally similar between groups during the DB trial, and were maintained during OLE.
Lurasidone was generally well tolerated and effective in clinically stable schizophrenia patients over the long term. Lurasidone was also generally well tolerated and maintained effectiveness over 6 months in patients switching from risperidone. Patients switching from risperidone experienced improvements in metabolic parameters and prolactin levels. These findings confirm lurasidone's long-term effectiveness and favourable metabolic profile in patients with schizophrenia.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00641745.
开展了一项双盲(DB)活性对照试验的事后分析及一项开放标签扩展(OLE)研究,以评估鲁拉西酮对精神分裂症患者的长期影响。
在DB试验中,患者被随机分配接受鲁拉西酮或利培酮治疗12个月。在OLE研究中,所有患者额外接受6个月的鲁拉西酮治疗。评估治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)。疗效评估包括复发率(仅DB试验)、阳性和阴性症状量表、临床总体印象-严重程度量表以及蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表。
在DB试验中,精神分裂症患者被随机分配至鲁拉西酮组(n = 399)和利培酮组(n = 190),其中分别有129例和84例继续进入OLE研究。在DB试验期间,鲁拉西酮组(84.1%)和利培酮组(84.2%)的TEAE发生率相似。鲁拉西酮与代谢变量和催乳素水平的最小变化相关,而利培酮与催乳素和空腹血糖水平的临床显著升高相关。在DB试验结束时,接受鲁拉西酮治疗的患者中代谢综合征患者的比例显著低于接受利培酮治疗的患者(25.5%对40.4%;p = 0.0177)。在OLE研究期间,从利培酮换用鲁拉西酮的患者体重和催乳素水平降低;继续接受鲁拉西酮治疗的患者代谢变量和催乳素变化最小。在OLE研究结束时,两组间代谢综合征患者的比例不再有显著差异(23.5%对31.5%;p = 无显著差异)。在DB试验期间,两组间疗效结果总体相似,并在OLE研究期间得以维持。
鲁拉西酮对临床稳定的精神分裂症患者长期而言总体耐受性良好且有效。对于从利培酮换用的患者,鲁拉西酮在6个月内总体耐受性良好且疗效得以维持。从利培酮换用的患者代谢参数和催乳素水平有所改善。这些发现证实了鲁拉西酮在精神分裂症患者中的长期疗效及良好的代谢特征。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT00641745。