Brothers Trevor, Kuperberg Gina R
Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA USA.
Department of Psychiatry and the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA.
J Mem Lang. 2021 Feb;116. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104174. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
During language comprehension, we routinely use information from the prior context to help identify the meaning of individual words. While measures of online processing difficulty, such as reading times, are strongly influenced by contextual predictability, there is disagreement about the mechanisms underlying this lexical predictability effect, with different models predicting different linking functions - (Reichle, Rayner & Pollatsek, 2003) or (Levy, 2008). To help resolve this debate, we conducted two highly-powered experiments (self-paced reading, N = 216; cross-modal picture naming, N = 36), and a meta-analysis of prior eye-tracking while reading studies (total N = 218). We observed a robust relationship between lexical predictability and word processing times across all three studies. Beyond their methodological implications, these findings also place important constraints on predictive processing models of language comprehension. In particular, these results directly contradict the empirical predictions of , while supporting a of lexical prediction effects in comprehension.
在语言理解过程中,我们通常会利用前文语境中的信息来帮助确定单个单词的含义。虽然诸如阅读时间等在线处理难度的指标会受到语境可预测性的强烈影响,但对于这种词汇可预测性效应背后的机制存在分歧,不同的模型预测出不同的关联函数(Reichle、Rayner和Pollatsek,2003年)或(Levy,2008年)。为了帮助解决这一争论,我们进行了两项大规模实验(自定步速阅读,N = 216;跨模态图片命名,N = 36),并对之前阅读研究中的眼动追踪进行了荟萃分析(总N = 218)。在所有三项研究中,我们都观察到词汇可预测性与单词处理时间之间存在稳健的关系。除了其方法学意义外,这些发现也对语言理解的预测处理模型施加了重要限制。特别是,这些结果直接与 的实证预测相矛盾,同时支持了对理解中词汇预测效应的 。