• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

区域麻醉下老年与年轻患者经皮肾镜取石术的结果:一项对比研究。

Outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly versus young patients under regional anesthesia: A comparative study.

作者信息

Gupta Rahul, Mahajan Arti

机构信息

Department of Urology, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

Department of Anesthesia, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

出版信息

Urol Ann. 2020 Jul-Sep;12(3):254-258. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_69_19. Epub 2020 Jul 17.

DOI:10.4103/UA.UA_69_19
PMID:33100751
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7546074/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Surgical management of elderly patients with renal calculi is inherently challenging. We compared the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) performed under regional anesthesia between elderly patients (age >65 years) and patients aged <65 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between July 2015 and June 2016, fifty patients aged >65 years with renal stones (size >1.5 cm) were treated with PCNL under regional anesthesia (elderly group). We retrospectively compared the outcomes with those obtained in an equal number of patients aged <65 years (younger group) who underwent PCNL under regional anesthesia. Patients with staghorn stones and pyonephrosis and falling under the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grade IV were excluded. Data pertaining to demographic characteristics, body mass index, stone bulk, operative time, tract size, number of tracts required, blood loss, clearance rates, complications, and length of hospital stay were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age at presentation in the elderly and younger groups was 66.8 ± 2.1 years and 38.7 ± 11 years, respectively; 56% of the patients in the elderly age group had ASA Grade II, whereas 58% in the younger age group had ASA Grade I. The mean stone size and the number of tracts were comparable in both the groups, whereas operative time was slightly longer in the elderly group (58.54 ± 18 vs. 51.98 ± 18 min; < 0.05). Postoperative complications and stone-free rates (94% vs. 92%, respectively) were comparable in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Age itself should not deter the treatment of elderly patients with renal stones as PCNL under regional anesthesia is safe and effective in elderly patients; outcomes in elderly and younger patients were comparable in this study.

摘要

引言

老年肾结石患者的手术治疗具有内在挑战性。我们比较了老年患者(年龄>65岁)和<65岁患者在区域麻醉下进行经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

2015年7月至2016年6月,50例年龄>65岁的肾结石患者(结石大小>1.5 cm)在区域麻醉下接受PCNL治疗(老年组)。我们回顾性比较了相同数量的<65岁患者(年轻组)在区域麻醉下接受PCNL的结果。排除鹿角形结石、肾积脓且属于美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)IV级的患者。分析了人口统计学特征、体重指数、结石体积、手术时间、通道大小、所需通道数量、失血量、清除率、并发症和住院时间等数据。

结果

老年组和年轻组患者的平均就诊年龄分别为66.8±2.1岁和38.7±11岁;老年年龄组56%的患者为ASA II级,而年轻年龄组58%的患者为ASA I级。两组的平均结石大小和通道数量相当,而老年组的手术时间略长(58.54±18 vs. 51.98±18分钟;<0.05)。两组术后并发症和结石清除率(分别为94%和92%)相当。

结论

年龄本身不应阻碍老年肾结石患者的治疗,因为区域麻醉下的PCNL对老年患者是安全有效的;本研究中老年患者和年轻患者的结果相当。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly versus young patients under regional anesthesia: A comparative study.区域麻醉下老年与年轻患者经皮肾镜取石术的结果:一项对比研究。
Urol Ann. 2020 Jul-Sep;12(3):254-258. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_69_19. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
2
Presentation of a method at the Exploration Stage according to IDEAL: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local infiltrative anesthesia is a feasible and effective method - retrospective analysis of 439 patients.按照IDEAL探索阶段呈现一种方法:局部浸润麻醉下经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是一种可行且有效的方法——对439例患者的回顾性分析
Int J Med Sci. 2017 Feb 25;14(4):302-309. doi: 10.7150/ijms.17963. eCollection 2017.
3
Mini- versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of pediatric renal stones: is smaller enough?微通道与标准经皮肾镜碎石术治疗小儿肾结石:更小就是更好吗?
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Dec;15(6):664.e1-664.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
4
Bilateral renal calculi: assessment of staged v synchronous percutaneous nephrolithotomy.双侧肾结石:分期与同期经皮肾镜取石术的评估
J Endourol. 2004 Mar;18(2):145-51. doi: 10.1089/089277904322959770.
5
The application of a novel integrated rigid and flexible Nephroscope in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal staghorn stones.一种新型软硬一体式肾镜在经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂性鹿角形肾结石中的应用。
BMC Urol. 2017 Aug 24;17(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0257-8.
6
Minimally invasive tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones.经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的微创通道。
J Endourol. 2010 Oct;24(10):1579-82. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0581.
7
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Young-Old, Old-Old, and Oldest-Old Patients: A Multicenter Study.经皮肾镜碎石术在中青年、老年和最老年患者中的应用:一项多中心研究。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Jul;31(7):796-802. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0537. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
8
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones: a randomised trial comparing high-power holmium laser versus ultrasonic lithotripsy.经皮肾镜取石术治疗鹿角形结石:一项比较高能量钬激光与超声碎石术的随机试验
BJU Int. 2016 Aug;118(2):307-12. doi: 10.1111/bju.13418. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
9
Number of tracts or stone size: which influences outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn renal stones?通道数量或结石大小:哪个因素会影响鹿角形肾结石经皮肾镜取石术的结果?
Urol Int. 2012;89(1):103-6. doi: 10.1159/000338645. Epub 2012 May 24.
10
Comparison of standard- and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones.标准经皮肾镜取石术与微通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗鹿角形结石的比较。
Arab J Urol. 2021 Jan 21;19(2):147-151. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2021.1878670.

引用本文的文献

1
Mini-Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery in Patients with Poor Performance Status: A Retrospective Analysis of Postoperative Fever in Over 1000 Cases.身体状况较差患者的迷你内镜联合肾内手术:1000余例术后发热情况的回顾性分析
Urol Res Pract. 2025 Jun 24;51(3):89-94. doi: 10.5152/tud.2025.25013.
2
Efficacy and safety of ureterorenoscopy in the elderly: A systematic review axnd meta-analysis.输尿管镜检查在老年人中的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2025 May 13;20(5):e0323237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323237. eCollection 2025.
3
Outcomes and Complications of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Single-Center Experience.经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)的治疗效果与并发症:单中心经验
Cureus. 2024 Sep 17;16(9):e69567. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69567. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Feasibility of Performing Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Solitary Renal Pelvic Stones (1.5-3 cm) Under Spinal Anaesthesia: A Single-Centre Study.脊髓麻醉下仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术治疗孤立性肾盂结石(1.5 - 3厘米)的可行性:一项单中心研究
Cureus. 2023 May 3;15(5):e38472. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38472. eCollection 2023 May.
5
Efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in elderly patients: a retrospective study.经皮肾镜碎石取石术治疗老年患者的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Surg. 2022 Nov 16;22(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01830-6.
6
Application of Clavien-Dindo Classification System for Complications of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.微创经皮肾镜取石术并发症的 Clavien-Dindo 分类系统的应用。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Dec 15;2021:5361415. doi: 10.1155/2021/5361415. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of elderly and younger patients.经皮肾镜取石术的结果:老年患者与年轻患者的比较。
Int Braz J Urol. 2013 Sep-Oct;39(5):692-700; discussion 701. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.05.12.
2
Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States.美国肾结石的患病率。
Eur Urol. 2012 Jul;62(1):160-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052. Epub 2012 Mar 31.
3
Prospective comparison of outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients versus younger patients.老年患者与年轻患者经皮肾镜取石术治疗效果的前瞻性比较。
J Endourol. 2012 Aug;26(8):996-1001. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0046. Epub 2012 May 23.
4
Can we avoid percutaneous nephrolithotomy in high-risk elderly patients using the Charlson comorbidity index?我们能否使用 Charlson 合并症指数避免对高危老年患者进行经皮肾镜取石术?
Urology. 2012 May;79(5):1042-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.060. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
5
Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients with moderate-size kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis.逆行性肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗老年中等大小肾结石患者的疗效比较:配对分析。
J Endourol. 2012 Jun;26(6):625-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0526. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
6
A randomized comparison of totally tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients.老年患者完全无管化与标准经皮肾镜碎石取石术的随机对照比较。
Urology. 2010 Aug;76(2):289-93. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.077. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
7
Results and complications of spinal anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术中脊髓麻醉的结果与并发症
Urol J. 2010 Winter;7(1):22-5.
8
The effect of age on outcomes in patients undergoing treatment for renal stones.年龄对接受肾结石治疗患者预后的影响。
Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Mar;19(2):211-4. doi: 10.1097/mou.0b013e32831e16b7.
9
Prevention and treatment of complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术后并发症的防治
Curr Opin Urol. 2008 Mar;18(2):229-34. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282f46afc.
10
Pathophysiological changes in the elderly.老年人的病理生理变化。
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2003 Jun;17(2):163-77. doi: 10.1016/s1521-6896(03)00010-7.