• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者与年轻患者经皮肾镜取石术治疗效果的前瞻性比较。

Prospective comparison of outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients versus younger patients.

机构信息

Arthur Smith Institute for Urology, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2012 Aug;26(8):996-1001. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0046. Epub 2012 May 23.

DOI:10.1089/end.2012.0046
PMID:22494028
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to prospectively compare operative and postoperative characteristics and outcomes in elderly patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) compared with younger patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospectively collected data from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) Global PCNL Study database were used. Elderly patients were defined as those aged 70 years and above, while younger patients were those between 18 and 70 years of age. Matched and unmatched group comparisons were performed based on imaging modality used for assessing stone-free status. Patient characteristics, operative data, and postoperative outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The median age of the elderly group vs the young group was 74 years (range 70-93 years) vs 49 years. In the unmatched analysis, staghorn stones were seen at higher rates in the elderly group (27.8% vs 21.8%, P=0.014); however, the mean stone size was not significantly different (465.0 vs 422.8, P=0.063). The length of hospitalization was significantly longer in the elderly group compared with the young group in the unmatched analysis (5 days vs 4.1 days, P<0.001). The same difference was not apparent in the matched analysis (5.0 days vs 4.4 days, P=0.288). Overall complication rates were not significantly different in the unmatched analysis. In the matched analysis, however, a statistically significant higher rate of overall complications was seen. Stone-free rates were similar among all groups.

CONCLUSION

PCNL in elderly patients over the age of 70 years produces results comparable to those seen in younger patients. With only a slightly higher-be it statistically significant-complication rate, the stone-free rate in older patients was the same as in the younger group.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在前瞻性比较接受经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)的老年患者与年轻患者的手术和术后特点及结局。

患者与方法

使用来自欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)经皮肾镜取石术全球研究数据库(CROES PCNL 数据库)的前瞻性收集数据。将老年患者定义为年龄 70 岁及以上,而年轻患者为 18 至 70 岁。根据评估结石清除状态所使用的影像学方式进行匹配和非匹配组比较。比较患者特征、手术数据和术后结局。

结果

老年组与年轻组的中位年龄分别为 74 岁(范围 70-93 岁)和 49 岁。在非匹配分析中,老年组鹿角形结石的发生率较高(27.8% vs 21.8%,P=0.014);然而,平均结石大小无显著差异(465.0 vs 422.8,P=0.063)。非匹配分析中,老年组的住院时间明显长于年轻组(5 天 vs 4.1 天,P<0.001)。在匹配分析中,这种差异并不明显(5.0 天 vs 4.4 天,P=0.288)。非匹配分析中,总体并发症发生率无显著差异。然而,在匹配分析中,总体并发症发生率存在统计学意义的升高。各组的结石清除率相似。

结论

70 岁以上老年患者行 PCNL 的效果与年轻患者相当。尽管并发症发生率略高(尽管具有统计学意义),但老年患者的结石清除率与年轻组相同。

相似文献

1
Prospective comparison of outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients versus younger patients.老年患者与年轻患者经皮肾镜取石术治疗效果的前瞻性比较。
J Endourol. 2012 Aug;26(8):996-1001. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0046. Epub 2012 May 23.
2
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children in different age groups: data from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study.经皮肾镜取石术在不同年龄组儿童中的应用:来自腔内泌尿外科学会临床研究办公室(CROES)经皮肾镜取石术全球研究的数据。
BJU Int. 2013 Jan;111(1):148-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11239.x. Epub 2012 May 11.
3
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy among patients with renal anomalies: patient characteristics and outcomes; a subgroup analysis of the clinical research office of the endourological society global percutaneous nephrolithotomy study.经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾畸形患者:患者特征和结局;经自然腔道内镜协会全球经皮肾镜取石研究临床研究办公室的亚组分析。
J Endourol. 2011 Oct;25(10):1627-32. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0146. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
4
Comparison of Guy and Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Nephrolithometry Scoring Systems for Predicting Stone-Free Status and Complication Rates After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Single Center Study with 437 Cases.经皮肾镜取石术后使用盖伊评分系统与腔内泌尿外科协会临床研究办公室肾石测量评分系统预测结石清除状态及并发症发生率的比较:一项纳入437例病例的单中心研究
J Endourol. 2015 Sep;29(9):1006-10. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0199. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
5
The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones.腔内泌尿外科学会临床研究办公室经皮肾镜取石术全球研究:鹿角形结石与非鹿角形结石。
J Endourol. 2011 Aug;25(8):1263-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0055. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
6
Minimally invasive tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones.经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的微创通道。
J Endourol. 2010 Oct;24(10):1579-82. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0581.
7
Impact of stone density on outcomes in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): an analysis of the clinical research office of the endourological society (CROES) pcnl global study database.结石密度对经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)治疗效果的影响:内镜泌尿外科学会临床研究办公室(CROES)PCNL全球研究数据库分析
Scand J Urol. 2013 Dec;47(6):509-14. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2013.803261. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
8
Isolated upper pole access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a large-scale analysis from the CROES percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study.孤立肾上极入路经皮肾镜取石术:CROES 经皮肾镜取石术全球研究的大规模分析。
J Urol. 2013 Feb;189(2):568-73. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.035. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
9
Renal access by urologist or radiologist during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜碎石术中泌尿科医生或放射科医生行肾脏入路。
J Endourol. 2010 Nov;24(11):1733-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0191. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
10
Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients with moderate-size kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis.逆行性肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗老年中等大小肾结石患者的疗效比较:配对分析。
J Endourol. 2012 Jun;26(6):625-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0526. Epub 2012 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The efficacy of continuing aspirin in the perioperative period during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮肾镜取石术围手术期持续使用阿司匹林的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Jul;41(7):2092-2100. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.7.12240.
2
Mini-Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery in Patients with Poor Performance Status: A Retrospective Analysis of Postoperative Fever in Over 1000 Cases.身体状况较差患者的迷你内镜联合肾内手术:1000余例术后发热情况的回顾性分析
Urol Res Pract. 2025 Jun 24;51(3):89-94. doi: 10.5152/tud.2025.25013.
3
Efficacy and safety of ureterorenoscopy in the elderly: A systematic review axnd meta-analysis.
输尿管镜检查在老年人中的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2025 May 13;20(5):e0323237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323237. eCollection 2025.
4
Time-sensitive elements in elective treatment of urinary lithiasis: a narrative review.尿石症择期治疗中的时间敏感因素:一项叙述性综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Jan 31;14(1):181-190. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-596. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
5
Evaluating postoperative complications in standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones larger than 2 cm: a retrospective study utilizing the E-PASS scoring system.评估标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径大于2厘米肾结石的术后并发症:一项采用E-PASS评分系统的回顾性研究
Urolithiasis. 2025 Jan 7;53(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01689-7.
6
Modified Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Elderly: Outcomes and Safety.老年患者改良仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术:疗效与安全性
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 21;12(14):4807. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144807.
7
The effect of anesthesia type on the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly males.麻醉类型对老年男性经皮肾镜取石术结局的影响。
Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2238185. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2238185.
8
Mini-Perc for Renal Stones-A Single Center Experience and Literature Review.经皮肾镜微造瘘治疗肾结石——单中心经验及文献综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 13;13(6):1083. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061083.
9
Management of large kidney stones in the geriatric population.老年人群体中较大肾结石的处理。
World J Urol. 2023 Apr;41(4):981-992. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04333-y. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
10
Efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in elderly patients: a retrospective study.经皮肾镜碎石取石术治疗老年患者的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Surg. 2022 Nov 16;22(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01830-6.