Czaplicki Lauren, Simpson Randall, Zhou Yitong, Patel Minal, Cuccia Alison F, Vallone Donna M, Schillo Barbara A
Schroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USA.
College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Tob Use Insights. 2020 Oct 9;13:1179173X20959700. doi: 10.1177/1179173X20959700. eCollection 2020.
The wide availability of flavored e-cigarettes and broad use of e-cigarettes in public places may contribute to the rapidly increasing rates of use among youth and young adults in the U.S. However, policies at the federal, state and local levels can address these factors.
Assess public support for 5 e-cigarette-related policies and evaluate response patterns by demographics, tobacco use, e-cigarette harm perceptions, geographic region, and strength of state-level clean indoor air policies.
Data were collected Oct-Dec 2018 from a nationally representative online panel of U.S. adults (n = 3211). We measured support for 5 policies: (1) a ban on the sale flavored e-cigarettes; (2) requiring tobacco products, like e-cigarettes, be kept out of view in stores where adolescents shop; and prohibiting e-cigarette use in (3) all public places; (4) restaurants; and (5) bars. Weighted, adjusted logistic regressions modeled variation in policy support.
A majority of respondents (63.3%) supported a flavor ban, with no differences in support by smoking status. Most respondents supported keeping tobacco products out of view (78.0%) and prohibiting e-cigarette use in indoor public places (82.9%), restaurants (86.5%), and bars (76.1%). In the adjusted models, current e-cigarette users had significantly lower odds of policy support compared to never users. We observed no differences in support by geographic region or strength of state-level clean indoor air policies.
Results suggest high levels of public support to regulate e-cigarette flavors, marketing, and use in public places. Targeted messaging may be needed to increase support among current e-cigarette users.
调味电子烟的广泛可得性以及在公共场所广泛使用电子烟,可能导致美国青少年和年轻人的使用率迅速上升。然而,联邦、州和地方各级的政策可以解决这些因素。
评估公众对5项与电子烟相关政策的支持度,并按人口统计学特征、烟草使用情况、对电子烟危害的认知、地理区域以及州级室内清洁空气政策的力度来评估回应模式。
2018年10月至12月从一个具有全国代表性的美国成年人在线小组(n = 3211)收集数据。我们测量了对5项政策的支持度:(1)禁止销售调味电子烟;(2)要求将电子烟等烟草制品在青少年购物的商店中置于视线之外;以及禁止在(3)所有公共场所;(4)餐厅;和(5)酒吧使用电子烟。加权调整后的逻辑回归模型分析了政策支持度的变化。
大多数受访者(63.3%)支持口味禁令,吸烟状况对支持度没有差异。大多数受访者支持将烟草制品置于视线之外(78.0%),并支持在室内公共场所(82.9%)、餐厅(86.5%)和酒吧(76.1%)禁止使用电子烟。在调整后的模型中,与从未使用过电子烟的人相比,当前电子烟使用者对政策支持的几率显著较低。我们未观察到地理区域或州级室内清洁空气政策力度对支持度有差异。
结果表明公众对规范电子烟口味、营销和在公共场所使用的支持度很高。可能需要有针对性的宣传信息来提高当前电子烟使用者的支持度。