Lehmann Philipp, Westberg Melissa, Tang Patrik, Lindström Leena, Käkelä Reijo
Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Front Physiol. 2020 Sep 25;11:576617. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.576617. eCollection 2020.
During winter insects face energetic stress driven by lack of food, and thermal stress due to sub-optimal and even lethal temperatures. To survive, most insects living in seasonal environments such as high latitudes, enter diapause, a deep resting stage characterized by a cessation of development, metabolic suppression and increased stress tolerance. The current study explores physiological adaptations related to diapause in three beetle species at high latitudes in Europe. From an ecological perspective, the comparison is interesting since one species () is an invasive pest that has recently expanded its range into northern Europe, where a retardation in range expansion is seen. By comparing its physiological toolkit to that of two closely related native beetles ( and ) with similar overwintering ecology and collected from similar latitude, we can study if harsh winters might be constraining further expansion. Our results suggest all species suppress metabolism during diapause and build large lipid stores before diapause, which then are used sparingly. In all species diapause is associated with temporal shifts in storage and membrane lipid profiles, mostly in accordance with the homeoviscous adaptation hypothesis, stating that low temperatures necessitate acclimation responses that increase fluidity of storage lipids, allowing their enzymatic hydrolysis, and ensure integral protein functions. Overall, the two native species had similar lipidomic profiles when compared to the invasive species, but all species showed specific shifts in their lipid profiles after entering diapause. Taken together, all three species show adaptations that improve energy saving and storage and membrane lipid fluidity during overwintering diapause. While the three species differed in the specific strategies used to increase lipid viscosity, the two native beetle species showed a more canalized lipidomic response, than the recent invader. Since close relatives with similar winter ecology can have different winter ecophysiology, extrapolations among species should be done with care. Still, range expansion of the recent invader into high latitude habitats might indeed be retarded by lack of physiological tools to manage especially thermal stress during winter, but conversely species adapted to long cold winters may face these stressors as a consequence of ongoing climate warming.
在冬季,昆虫面临因食物短缺导致的能量压力,以及因温度不理想甚至致命而产生的热应激。为了生存,大多数生活在高纬度等季节性环境中的昆虫会进入滞育状态,这是一个深度休息阶段,其特征是发育停止、代谢抑制和应激耐受性增强。当前的研究探索了欧洲高纬度地区三种甲虫物种与滞育相关的生理适应性。从生态学角度来看,这种比较很有趣,因为其中一个物种()是一种入侵害虫,其范围最近已扩展到北欧,但在那里其范围扩展出现了停滞。通过将其生理机制与另外两种具有相似越冬生态且采集自相似纬度的近缘本地甲虫(和)的生理机制进行比较,我们可以研究严酷的冬季是否可能限制其进一步扩张。我们的结果表明,所有物种在滞育期间都会抑制新陈代谢,并在滞育前积累大量脂质储备,然后谨慎使用这些储备。在所有物种中,滞育都与储存脂质和膜脂质谱的时间变化有关,这大多符合同型粘性适应假说,该假说认为低温需要适应性反应,以增加储存脂质的流动性,使其能够进行酶促水解,并确保蛋白质的完整功能。总体而言,与入侵物种相比,这两种本地物种具有相似的脂质组学特征,但所有物种在进入滞育后其脂质谱都出现了特定变化。综上所述,所有这三个物种都表现出在越冬滞育期间改善能量节约与储存以及膜脂质流动性的适应性。虽然这三个物种在增加脂质粘度所采用的具体策略上有所不同,但这两种本地甲虫物种的脂质组学反应比最近的入侵者更为规范。由于具有相似冬季生态的近缘物种可能具有不同的冬季生态生理学,因此在物种间进行推断时应谨慎。尽管如此,最近的入侵者向高纬度栖息地的范围扩张可能确实因缺乏应对冬季特别是热应激的生理机制而受到阻碍,但相反,适应漫长寒冷冬季的物种可能会因持续的气候变暖而面临这些应激源。