• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用吉布斯切片采样器估计CDM

Estimating CDMs Using the Slice-Within-Gibbs Sampler.

作者信息

Xu Xin, de la Torre Jimmy, Zhang Jiwei, Guo Jinxin, Shi Ningzhong

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Applied Statistics of MOE, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.

Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 25;11:2260. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02260. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02260
PMID:33101108
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7545134/
Abstract

In this paper, the slice-within-Gibbs sampler has been introduced as a method for estimating cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs). Compared with other Bayesian methods, the slice-within-Gibbs sampler can employ a wide-range of prior specifications; moreover, it can also be applied to complex CDMs with the aid of auxiliary variables, especially when applying different identifiability constraints. To evaluate its performances, two simulation studies were conducted. The first study confirmed the viability of the slice-within-Gibbs sampler in estimating CDMs, mainly including G-DINA and DINA models. The second study compared the slice-within-Gibbs sampler with other commonly used Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithms, and the results showed that the slice-within-Gibbs sampler converged much faster than the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm and more flexible than the Gibbs sampling in choosing the distributions of priors. Finally, a fraction subtraction dataset was analyzed to illustrate the use of the slice-within-Gibbs sampler in the context of CDMs.

摘要

在本文中,已引入吉布斯抽样内切片法作为估计认知诊断模型(CDM)的一种方法。与其他贝叶斯方法相比,吉布斯抽样内切片法可以采用多种先验规范;此外,借助辅助变量,它还可应用于复杂的CDM,特别是在应用不同的可识别性约束时。为评估其性能,进行了两项模拟研究。第一项研究证实了吉布斯抽样内切片法在估计CDM方面的可行性,主要包括G-DINA和DINA模型。第二项研究将吉布斯抽样内切片法与其他常用的马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗算法进行了比较,结果表明,吉布斯抽样内切片法的收敛速度比梅特罗波利斯-黑斯廷斯算法快得多,并且在选择先验分布方面比吉布斯抽样更灵活。最后,分析了一个分数减法数据集,以说明吉布斯抽样内切片法在CDM背景下的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f777/7545134/428ed0551d89/fpsyg-11-02260-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f777/7545134/05c74f6cf8dc/fpsyg-11-02260-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f777/7545134/4184048c5b6e/fpsyg-11-02260-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f777/7545134/85b3b5aaab8a/fpsyg-11-02260-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f777/7545134/094414fb8add/fpsyg-11-02260-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f777/7545134/19a04205d485/fpsyg-11-02260-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f777/7545134/41efb89b06b6/fpsyg-11-02260-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f777/7545134/017adf1d6306/fpsyg-11-02260-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f777/7545134/f117a2228635/fpsyg-11-02260-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f777/7545134/428ed0551d89/fpsyg-11-02260-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f777/7545134/05c74f6cf8dc/fpsyg-11-02260-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f777/7545134/4184048c5b6e/fpsyg-11-02260-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f777/7545134/85b3b5aaab8a/fpsyg-11-02260-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f777/7545134/094414fb8add/fpsyg-11-02260-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f777/7545134/19a04205d485/fpsyg-11-02260-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f777/7545134/41efb89b06b6/fpsyg-11-02260-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f777/7545134/017adf1d6306/fpsyg-11-02260-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f777/7545134/f117a2228635/fpsyg-11-02260-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f777/7545134/428ed0551d89/fpsyg-11-02260-g0009.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimating CDMs Using the Slice-Within-Gibbs Sampler.使用吉布斯切片采样器估计CDM
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 25;11:2260. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02260. eCollection 2020.
2
Estimating the DINA model parameters using the No-U-Turn Sampler.使用无回转采样器估计DINA模型参数。
Biom J. 2018 Mar;60(2):352-368. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201600225. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
3
Gibbs-Slice Sampling Algorithm for Estimating the Four-Parameter Logistic Model.用于估计四参数逻辑模型的吉布斯切片采样算法
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 18;11:2121. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02121. eCollection 2020.
4
Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Model With Pólya-Gamma Gibbs Sampling.基于波利亚-伽马吉布斯抽样的DINA模型贝叶斯估计
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 10;11:384. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00384. eCollection 2020.
5
Performance of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and No-U-Turn Sampler for estimating genetic parameters and breeding values.汉密尔顿蒙特卡罗法和无回转抽样器在估计遗传参数和育种值中的性能。
Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Dec 10;51(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0515-1.
6
A Novel and Highly Effective Bayesian Sampling Algorithm Based on the Auxiliary Variables to Estimate the Testlet Effect Models.一种基于辅助变量的新型高效贝叶斯抽样算法,用于估计测验题目组效应模型。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 11;12:509575. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.509575. eCollection 2021.
7
A fast and efficient Gibbs sampler for BayesB in whole-genome analyses.全基因组分析中用于BayesB的一种快速高效的吉布斯采样器。
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Oct 14;47:80. doi: 10.1186/s12711-015-0157-x.
8
Markov chain Monte Carlo Gibbs sampler approach for estimating haplotype frequencies among multiple malaria infected human blood samples.马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗 Gibbs 抽样法估计多重疟疾感染人类血液样本中的单倍型频率。
Malar J. 2021 Jul 10;20(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03841-9.
9
Sampling phylogenetic tree space with the generalized Gibbs sampler.使用广义吉布斯采样器对系统发育树空间进行采样。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2005 Mar;34(3):459-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.11.016. Epub 2005 Jan 8.
10
A Gibbs Sampler for Learning DAGs.一种用于学习有向无环图的吉布斯采样器。
J Mach Learn Res. 2016 Apr;17(30):1-39.

本文引用的文献

1
Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Model With Pólya-Gamma Gibbs Sampling.基于波利亚-伽马吉布斯抽样的DINA模型贝叶斯估计
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 10;11:384. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00384. eCollection 2020.
2
A Sparse Latent Class Model for Cognitive Diagnosis.稀疏潜在类别模型在认知诊断中的应用。
Psychometrika. 2020 Mar;85(1):121-153. doi: 10.1007/s11336-019-09693-2. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
3
Using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo to estimate the log-linear cognitive diagnosis model via Stan.使用 Hamiltonian 蒙特卡罗通过 Stan 估算对数线性认知诊断模型。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):651-662. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1069-9.
4
A Cognitive Diagnosis Model for Identifying Coexisting Skills and Misconceptions.一种用于识别共存技能和误解的认知诊断模型。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2018 May;42(3):179-191. doi: 10.1177/0146621617722791. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
5
An Improved Strategy for Bayesian Estimation of the Reduced Reparameterized Unified Model.一种用于简化重新参数化统一模型的贝叶斯估计的改进策略。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2018 Mar;42(2):99-115. doi: 10.1177/0146621617707511. Epub 2017 May 16.
6
Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.结合项目反应时间的认知诊断建模
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2018 May;71(2):262-286. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12114. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
7
Statistical Analysis of -matrix Based Diagnostic Classification Models.基于矩阵的诊断分类模型的统计分析
J Am Stat Assoc. 2015;110(510):850-866. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2014.934827.
8
Theory of the Self-learning -Matrix.自学习矩阵理论
Bernoulli (Andover). 2013 Nov 1;19(5A):1790-1817. doi: 10.3150/12-BEJ430.
9
A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data.应用于语言测试数据的通用诊断模型。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2008 Nov;61(Pt 2):287-307. doi: 10.1348/000711007X193957. Epub 2007 Mar 22.
10
Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models.使用认知诊断模型测量心理障碍。
Psychol Methods. 2006 Sep;11(3):287-305. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.3.287.