• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 Hamiltonian 蒙特卡罗通过 Stan 估算对数线性认知诊断模型。

Using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo to estimate the log-linear cognitive diagnosis model via Stan.

机构信息

University of Alabama, 309E LB Gorgas Library, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA.

University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):651-662. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1069-9.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-018-1069-9
PMID:29949073
Abstract

The Bayesian literature has shown that the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) algorithm is powerful and efficient for statistical model estimation, especially for complicated models. Stan, a software program built upon HMC, has been introduced as a means of psychometric modeling estimation. However, there are no systemic guidelines for implementing Stan with the log-linear cognitive diagnosis model (LCDM), which is the saturated version of many cognitive diagnostic model (CDM) variants. This article bridges the gap between Stan application and Bayesian LCDM estimation: Both the modeling procedures and Stan code are demonstrated in detail, such that this strategy can be extended to other CDMs straightforwardly.

摘要

贝叶斯文献表明, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo(HMC)算法对于统计模型估计非常强大和高效,特别是对于复杂模型。Stan 是一个基于 HMC 的软件程序,被引入作为心理测量建模估计的一种手段。然而,对于使用 HMC 实现对数线性认知诊断模型(LCDM),即许多认知诊断模型(CDM)变体的饱和版本,并没有系统的指导方针。本文弥合了 Stan 应用与贝叶斯 LCDM 估计之间的差距:详细演示了建模过程和 Stan 代码,以便可以将此策略直接扩展到其他 CDM。

相似文献

1
Using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo to estimate the log-linear cognitive diagnosis model via Stan.使用 Hamiltonian 蒙特卡罗通过 Stan 估算对数线性认知诊断模型。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):651-662. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1069-9.
2
Using the Stan Program for Bayesian Item Response Theory.使用斯坦程序进行贝叶斯项目反应理论分析。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Jun;78(3):384-408. doi: 10.1177/0013164417693666. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
3
Bayesian inference using Hamiltonian Monte-Carlo algorithm for nonlinear joint modeling in the context of cancer immunotherapy.基于 Hamiltonian Monte-Carlo 算法的贝叶斯推断在癌症免疫治疗中的非线性联合建模。
Stat Med. 2020 Dec 30;39(30):4853-4868. doi: 10.1002/sim.8756. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
4
A comparison of computational algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of clinical trials.临床试验贝叶斯分析的计算算法比较。
Clin Trials. 2024 Dec;21(6):689-700. doi: 10.1177/17407745241247334. Epub 2024 May 16.
5
Learning Hamiltonian Monte Carlo in R.在R语言中学习哈密顿蒙特卡洛方法。
Am Stat. 2021;75(4):403-413. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2020.1865198. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
6
A method for efficiently sampling from distributions with correlated dimensions.一种高效抽样相关维度分布的方法。
Psychol Methods. 2013 Sep;18(3):368-84. doi: 10.1037/a0032222. Epub 2013 May 6.
7
Estimating the DINA model parameters using the No-U-Turn Sampler.使用无回转采样器估计DINA模型参数。
Biom J. 2018 Mar;60(2):352-368. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201600225. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
8
Contemporary statistical inference for infectious disease models using Stan.使用 Stan 进行传染病模型的当代统计推断。
Epidemics. 2019 Dec;29:100367. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2019.100367. Epub 2019 Oct 5.
9
Flexible and efficient Bayesian pharmacometrics modeling using Stan and Torsten, Part I.灵活高效的贝叶斯药物代谢动力学建模使用 Stan 和 Torsten,第一部分。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2022 Sep;11(9):1151-1169. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12812. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
10
Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methods for efficient parameter estimation in steady state dynamical systems.用于稳态动力系统中有效参数估计的哈密顿蒙特卡罗方法。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2014 Jul 28;15(1):253. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-253.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing descriptive and theoretical models of decision-making under uncertainty and their relation to socioeconomic factors.比较不确定性下决策的描述性模型和理论模型及其与社会经济因素的关系。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 15;20(9):e0332189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332189. eCollection 2025.
2
Accounting for item calibration error in computerized adaptive testing.计算机自适应测试中项目校准误差的核算。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Mar 26;57(5):126. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02649-8.
3
Item response theory model highlighting rating scale of a rubric and rater-rubric interaction in objective structured clinical examination.
项目反应理论模型突出了客观结构化临床考试中等级量表的评分和评分者-等级量表的交互作用。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0309887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309887. eCollection 2024.
4
Robustness of the performance of the optimized hierarchical two-parameter logistic IRT model for small-sample item calibration.优化的层次双参数逻辑斯蒂克IRT 模型在小样本项目标定中性能的稳健性。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Dec;55(8):3965-3983. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-02000-5. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
5
A Bayesian many-facet Rasch model with Markov modeling for rater severity drift.贝叶斯多项 RASCH 模型与马尔可夫建模用于评分者严重偏差。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Oct;55(7):3910-3928. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01997-z. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
6
Direct Estimation of Diagnostic Classification Model Attribute Mastery Profiles via a Collapsed Gibbs Sampling Algorithm.通过崩溃 Gibbs 采样算法直接估计诊断分类模型属性掌握情况。
Psychometrika. 2022 Dec;87(4):1390-1421. doi: 10.1007/s11336-022-09857-7. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
7
Estimating Cognitive Diagnosis Models in Small Samples: Bayes Modal Estimation and Monotonic Constraints.小样本中认知诊断模型的估计:贝叶斯模态估计与单调约束
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 Mar;45(2):95-111. doi: 10.1177/0146621620977681. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
8
Estimating CDMs Using the Slice-Within-Gibbs Sampler.使用吉布斯切片采样器估计CDM
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 25;11:2260. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02260. eCollection 2020.
9
The Impact of Sample Attrition on Longitudinal Learning Diagnosis: A Prolog.样本损耗对纵向学习诊断的影响:引言
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 3;11:1051. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01051. eCollection 2020.
10
Diagnostic Classification Models for Ordinal Item Responses.有序项目反应的诊断分类模型
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 11;9:2512. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02512. eCollection 2018.