Jutzi Chiara A, Willardt Robin, Schmid Petra C, Jonas Eva
Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 30;11:578586. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.578586. eCollection 2020.
The current situation around coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) portrays a threat to us in several ways: It imposes uncertainty and a lack of control and reminds us of our own mortality. People around the world have reacted to these threats in seemingly unrelated ways: From stockpiling yeast and toilet paper to favoring nationalist ideas or endorsing conspiratorial beliefs. According to the , the confrontation with a threat - a discrepant experience - makes humans react with both proximal and distal threat responses. While the proximal response manifests in behavioral inhibition that leads to heightened anxious arousal and vigilance, distal responses seek to lower behavioral inhibition and the associated state of anxiety and vigilance through engaging in distal defenses. In the present research, we propose that the reactions to COVID-19 may represent distal defense strategies to the pandemic and, therefore, can be explained and forecasted by the model. Thus, we hypothesized increased perceived COVID-19 threat to lead to a proximal threat response in the form of heightened behavioral inhibition. This, in return, should enhance the use of distal defenses (i.e., several ingroup biases, system justification, and conspiratorial beliefs) overlapping with the reactions observed as a response to COVID-19. This hypothesized mediated effect of increased perceived COVID-19 threat on distal defenses was tested in two preregistered studies: In Study 1 ( = 358), results showed perceived COVID-19 threat to be related to behavioral inhibition and, in turn, to be associated with increased distal defenses (i.e., higher entitativity, control restoration motivation, passive party support). In Study 2 ( = 348), we manipulated COVID-19 threat salience and found results suggesting the distal defenses of ingroup entitativity, system justification, and conspiratorial beliefs to be mediated by the proximal threat response. The results of the present research hint toward a common mechanism through which the seemingly unrelated reactions to COVID-19 can be explained. The results might help to predict future behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic and to design measures to counteract the detrimental effects of the pandemic.
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)当前的形势在多个方面给我们带来了威胁:它带来了不确定性和失控感,并让我们意识到自身的必死命运。世界各地的人们对这些威胁做出了看似毫不相干的反应:从囤积酵母和卫生纸到支持民族主义思想或认同阴谋论观点。根据[相关理论],与威胁——一种不相符的经历——的对抗会使人类产生近端和远端威胁反应。近端反应表现为行为抑制,导致焦虑唤醒和警觉性提高,而远端反应则试图通过采取远端防御措施来降低行为抑制以及相关的焦虑和警觉状态。在本研究中,我们提出对COVID-19的反应可能代表了针对该大流行的远端防御策略,因此,可以用该模型进行解释和预测。因此,我们假设对COVID-19威胁感知的增加会导致以行为抑制增强形式出现的近端威胁反应。反过来,这应该会增加远端防御措施(即几种内群体偏见、系统合理化和阴谋论信念)的使用,这些与作为对COVID-19反应所观察到的反应重叠。在两项预先注册的研究中测试了这种假设的对COVID-19威胁感知增加对远端防御的中介效应:在研究1(n = 358)中,结果表明对COVID-19的威胁感知与行为抑制相关,进而与远端防御措施的增加(即更高的实体性、控制恢复动机、被动党派支持)相关。在研究2(n = 348)中,我们操纵了COVID-19威胁的显著性,发现结果表明内群体实体性、系统合理化和阴谋论信念的远端防御是由近端威胁反应介导的。本研究结果暗示了一种共同机制,通过该机制可以解释对COVID-19看似不相关的反应。这些结果可能有助于预测COVID-19大流行期间的未来行为,并设计措施来抵消大流行的有害影响。