Oostlander Samantha A, Bournival Vanessa, O'Sullivan Tracey L
Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Canada.
School of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, Canada.
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2020 Dec;51:101925. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101925. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
Emergency managers (EMs) and Emergency Social Services Directors (ESSDs) are essential service providers who fulfill critical roles in disaster risk reduction. Despite being positioned throughout all levels of government, and in the private sector, EMs and ESSDs fulfill roles which occur largely behind the scenes. The purpose of this phenomenological study was to explore the roles of EMs and ESSDs from different regions across Canada. Specifically, we wanted to understand their perceptions of barriers, vulnerabilities and capabilities within the context of their roles. EMs (n = 15) and ESSDs (n = 6) from six Canadian provinces participated in semi-structured telephone interviews. Through content analysis, five themes and one model were generated from the data: 1) Emergency management is not synonymous with first response, 2) Unrealistic expectations for a "side-of-desk" role, 3) Minding the gap between academia and practice with a 'whole-society' approach, 4) Personal preparedness tends to be weak, 5) Behind the scenes roles can have mental health implications. We present a model, based on these themes, which makes explicit the occupational risks that EMs and ESSDs may encounter in carrying out the skills, tasks, and roles of their jobs. Identification of occupational risks is a first step towards reducing vulnerabilities and supporting capability. This is particularly relevant in our current society as increased demands placed on these professionals coincides with the increasing frequency and severity of natural disasters due to climate change and the emergence of the world wide COVID-19 pandemic.
应急管理人员(EMs)和应急社会服务主任(ESSDs)是重要的服务提供者,在减少灾害风险方面发挥着关键作用。尽管他们分布在各级政府和私营部门,但EMs和ESSDs所履行的职责大多是在幕后进行的。这项现象学研究的目的是探讨加拿大不同地区的EMs和ESSDs的角色。具体而言,我们想了解他们在其角色背景下对障碍、脆弱性和能力的看法。来自加拿大六个省份的15名EMs和6名ESSDs参与了半结构化电话访谈。通过内容分析,从数据中生成了五个主题和一个模型:1)应急管理并不等同于第一响应;2)对“兼职”角色的不切实际期望;3)以“全社会”方法弥合学术界与实践之间的差距;4)个人准备往往不足;5)幕后角色可能对心理健康有影响。我们基于这些主题提出了一个模型,该模型明确了EMs和ESSDs在履行其工作技能、任务和角色时可能遇到的职业风险。识别职业风险是减少脆弱性和支持能力的第一步。在我们当前的社会中,这一点尤为重要,因为对这些专业人员的需求增加,与此同时,由于气候变化和全球新冠疫情的出现,自然灾害的频率和严重程度也在不断上升。