Barnard T
LKB Produkter AB, Bromma, Sweden.
Scanning Microsc. 1987 Sep;1(3):1217-24.
It has been realized almost from the start of biological electron microscopy that the use of low temperature in specimen preparation might alleviate the problems associated with conventional chemical fixation and plastic embedding. In practice it has been very difficult to realize any benefits, owing to the problems encountered in trying to prepare samples with the water transformed to ice, yet without the sample itself hopelessly distorted by ice crystals. The difficulty is caused by the poor diffusibility of heat through water, the main constituent of almost all biological samples. Even with a maximal temperature gradient between the sample surface and the coolant, and a perfect contact between the two, heat diffusibility through the sample quickly becomes the limiting parameter affecting cooling rate. Unless the cooling rate is as high as 10(2) or even 10(3) degrees C.msec.-1, the ice formed will be crystalline. Such high cooling rates can only be attained in the first few micrometers of even very small samples: therefore, for bulk samples one must either accept the use of a 'suitable' cryoprotectant, or else accept the presence of ice crystals. Theoretical and practical considerations for freezing samples using liquid and solid coolants will be reviewed. Special consideration will be given to the present status of cryoprotection and the indications and contra-indications for its use.
几乎从生物电子显微镜技术诞生之初,人们就已认识到在样品制备过程中采用低温可能会缓解与传统化学固定和塑料包埋相关的问题。实际上,由于在试图将水转化为冰来制备样品时遇到了问题,却又不让样品本身因冰晶而严重变形,所以很难实现任何益处。这个难题是由热量在几乎所有生物样品的主要成分——水——中的扩散性差所导致的。即便在样品表面与冷却剂之间存在最大的温度梯度,且二者之间有完美的接触,热量在样品中的扩散性很快就会成为影响冷却速率的限制参数。除非冷却速率高达10²甚至10³℃·毫秒⁻¹,否则形成的冰将会是晶体状的。如此高的冷却速率只有在即使非常小的样品最初的几微米内才能实现:因此,对于大量样品而言,人们要么接受使用“合适的”冷冻保护剂,要么就得接受冰晶的存在。本文将综述使用液体和固体冷却剂冷冻样品的理论及实际考量因素。将特别关注冷冻保护的现状及其使用的适应证和禁忌证。