• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋部与椎体脆性骨折的发病率和死亡率比较:哪一种负担最重?

Comparison of morbidity and mortality of hip and vertebral fragility fractures: Which one has the highest burden?

作者信息

Rizkallah Maroun, Bachour Falah, Khoury Mirvat El, Sebaaly Amer, Finianos Boutros, Hage Rawad El, Maalouf Ghassan

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Bellevue Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.

Department of Musculoskeletal Health, Bellevue Medical Center, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2020 Sep;6(3):146-150. doi: 10.1016/j.afos.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.afos.2020.07.002
PMID:33102809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7573502/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Hip fragility fractures were regarded as one of the most severe, but recent papers report on the underestimated burden of vertebral compression fractures. This study aims to compare morbidity and mortality of hip and vertebral fragility fractures in patients treated in the same setting.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥50 years with hip fracture, and those with vertebral fracture presenting to our hospital between January 2014 and January 2017 were included. Patients were evaluated 1 year after their index fracture. SF-36 scores, mortality, and institutionalization are then recorded. Patients were divided into 2 groups: hip fractures and vertebral fractures.

RESULTS

There were 106 and 90 patients respectively evaluated in hip and vertebral fracture groups at 1 year. Patients in both groups were comparable for age, sex, comorbidities and neuropsychiatric condition (P > 0.05). At 1 year follow-up, SF-36 showed better averages in all 8 scales in hip fracture group compared to vertebral fracture group. Mortality in the hip fracture group reached 32.1% compared to 10% for the vertebral fracture group (P < 0.01). Fifteen patients were institutionalized in the hip fracture group compared to 18 patients in the vertebral fracture group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

When comparing patients treated in the same setting, hip fracture is associated with significantly increased mortality than vertebral fracture; however, the latter is associated with more morbidity.

摘要

目的

髋部脆性骨折曾被视为最严重的骨折类型之一,但近期有论文报道了椎体压缩性骨折被低估的负担。本研究旨在比较在相同治疗环境下髋部和椎体脆性骨折患者的发病率和死亡率。

方法

纳入2014年1月至2017年1月期间在我院就诊的年龄≥50岁的髋部骨折患者以及椎体骨折患者。在其初次骨折后1年对患者进行评估。记录SF-36评分、死亡率和入住机构情况。将患者分为两组:髋部骨折组和椎体骨折组。

结果

1年后髋部骨折组和椎体骨折组分别有106例和90例患者接受评估。两组患者在年龄、性别、合并症和神经精神状况方面具有可比性(P>0.05)。在1年随访时,与椎体骨折组相比,髋部骨折组在SF-36的所有8个量表上平均得分更高。髋部骨折组的死亡率为32.1%,而椎体骨折组为10%(P<0.01)。髋部骨折组有15例患者入住机构,椎体骨折组有18例患者入住机构(P>0.05)。

结论

在比较相同治疗环境下的患者时,髋部骨折比椎体骨折的死亡率显著增加;然而,椎体骨折的发病率更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a036/7573502/a0eb716974a9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a036/7573502/a0eb716974a9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a036/7573502/a0eb716974a9/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of morbidity and mortality of hip and vertebral fragility fractures: Which one has the highest burden?髋部与椎体脆性骨折的发病率和死亡率比较:哪一种负担最重?
Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2020 Sep;6(3):146-150. doi: 10.1016/j.afos.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
2
A survey of outcomes and management of patients post fragility fractures in China.中国脆性骨折患者的治疗结果与管理调查。
Osteoporos Int. 2015 Nov;26(11):2631-40. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3162-6. Epub 2015 May 13.
3
Reporting of vertebral fragility fractures: can radiologists help reduce the number of hip fractures?报告椎体脆性骨折:放射科医生能否帮助减少髋部骨折?
Arch Osteoporos. 2017 Dec;12(1):71. doi: 10.1007/s11657-017-0363-y. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
4
The role of the orthopaedic surgeon in the prevention of refracture in patients treated surgically for fragility hip and vertebral fracture.骨科医生在接受手术治疗的脆性髋部和椎体骨折患者预防再骨折方面的作用。
Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2014 Jan;11(1):31-5.
5
Proportion of Hidden Vertebral Fractures Among Egyptian Males With Fragility Hip Fractures in the Emergency Room of Ain Shams University Hospitals.艾因夏姆斯大学医院急诊室中埃及男性脆性髋部骨折患者隐匿性椎体骨折的比例。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 5;15(12):e49960. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49960. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Rates of osteoporosis screening and treatment following vertebral fracture.椎体骨折后骨质疏松症的筛查和治疗率。
Spine J. 2019 Mar;19(3):411-417. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
7
The Prevalence of Frailty in Patients Admitted to Hospital with Vertebral Fragility Fractures.因椎体脆性骨折入院患者的衰弱患病率
Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2016;12(3):244-247.
8
Risk of Subsequent Hip Fractures across Varying Treatment Patterns for Index Vertebral Compression Fractures.不同治疗模式下初次椎体压缩性骨折后发生髋部骨折的风险
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 14;13(16):4781. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164781.
9
A comparison of survival rates for hip fracture patients with or without subsequent osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.比较有或无后继骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的髋部骨折患者的生存率。
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2012 Feb;226(2):129-35. doi: 10.1620/tjem.226.129.
10
Predicting Future Hip Fractures on Routine Abdominal CT Using Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening Measures: A Matched Case-Control Study.利用机会性骨质疏松症筛查措施预测常规腹部 CT 中的未来髋部骨折:一项匹配的病例对照研究。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Aug;209(2):395-402. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.17820. Epub 2017 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Clinical Outcomes after Hip Fracture Surgery in Elderly Patients.2019年冠状病毒病大流行对老年患者髋部骨折手术后临床结局的影响
Hip Pelvis. 2025 Sep 1;37(3):223-229. doi: 10.5371/hp.2025.37.3.223.
2
Fractures incidence and its association on mortality in multiple myeloma patients: a nationwide cohort study (CAREMM-2105 study).多发性骨髓瘤患者骨折发生率及其与死亡率的关联:一项全国性队列研究(CAREMM - 2105研究)
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 27;15(1):27321. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09811-4.
3
Impact of prior fragility fracture on patient's mortality, outcomes, and complications after hip fracture surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Sarcopenia on Mortality after Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Treatment for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.肌少症对老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折经皮椎体强化治疗后死亡率的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jun;138:e354-e360. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.121. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
2
Breaking the cycle of recurrent fracture: implementing the first fracture liaison service (FLS) in British Columbia, Canada.打破反复骨折的循环:在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省实施首个骨折联络服务(FLS)。
Arch Osteoporos. 2019 Nov 27;14(1):116. doi: 10.1007/s11657-019-0662-6.
3
既往脆性骨折对髋部骨折手术后患者死亡率、预后及并发症的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 4;26(1):593. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08853-z.
4
Bone Health, Fragility Fractures, and the Hand Surgeon.骨骼健康、脆性骨折与手外科医生
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2025 Mar 12;7(3):100709. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.02.002. eCollection 2025 May.
5
Impact of smoking, diabetes, and exercise on dementia risk in women with osteoporosis: a nationwide cohort study.吸烟、糖尿病和运动对骨质疏松症女性患痴呆症风险的影响:一项全国性队列研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.1007/s00198-025-07524-y.
6
Effects of vitamin D3, omega-3 s and a simple home exercise program on incident vertebral fractures: the DO-HEALTH randomized controlled trial.维生素D3、ω-3脂肪酸及简单家庭锻炼计划对新发椎体骨折的影响:DO-HEALTH随机对照试验
J Bone Miner Res. 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.1093/jbmr/zjaf058.
7
Physiotherapy Capabilities in the Health Care of Adult Patients at Increased Risk of Osteoporotic Fractures: A Scoping Review Protocol.针对骨质疏松性骨折风险增加的成年患者的医疗保健中的物理治疗能力:一项范围综述方案
Musculoskeletal Care. 2025 Jun;23(2):e70125. doi: 10.1002/msc.70125.
8
Race, Ethnicity, and Mortality Following Major Osteoporotic Fracture: Results from the Women's Health Initiative Study.种族、族裔与严重骨质疏松性骨折后的死亡率:妇女健康倡议研究结果
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Apr 24. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09506-6.
9
Improved radiological diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fragility fractures following UK-wide interventions and re-audit-can this be maintained and translated into clinical practice?在全英国范围的干预措施及重新审核之后,骨质疏松性椎体脆性骨折的放射学诊断得到改善——这种情况能否得以维持并转化为临床实践?
Osteoporos Int. 2025 Jun;36(6):1069-1076. doi: 10.1007/s00198-025-07488-z. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
10
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Osteoporosis: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Tertiary Center.骨质疏松症的患病率及危险因素:一项在三级医疗中心开展的横断面研究
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 23;60(12):2109. doi: 10.3390/medicina60122109.
Performance of a Fracture Liaison Service in an Orthopaedic Setting: A Report of Key Indicators and Improvement of Longitudinal Outcomes.
骨科环境中骨折联络服务的表现:关键指标报告和纵向结局改善。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Mar 18;102(6):486-494. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00185.
4
Risk of institutionalization following fragility fractures in older people.老年人脆性骨折后住院风险。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Jul;30(7):1363-1370. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-04922-x. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
5
All-cause mortality with current and past use of antidepressants or benzodiazepines after major osteoporotic and hip fracture.主要骨质疏松性骨折和髋部骨折后使用抗抑郁药或苯二氮䓬类药物的全因死亡率。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Mar;30(3):573-581. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-04851-9. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
6
Effect of a Fracture Liaison Service on the Rate of Subsequent Fracture Among Patients With a Fragility Fracture in the Norwegian Capture the Fracture Initiative (NoFRACT): A Trial Protocol.挪威脆性骨折捕获计划(NoFRACT)中骨折联络服务对脆性骨折患者再次骨折率的影响:一项试验方案。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e185701. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5701.
7
Effect of Sarcopenia on Postoperative Mortality in Osteoporotic Hip Fracture Patients.肌肉减少症对骨质疏松性髋部骨折患者术后死亡率的影响。
J Bone Metab. 2018 Nov;25(4):227-233. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2018.25.4.227. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
8
The Sensitivity of Orthopaedic Surgeons to the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures.骨科医生对脆性骨折二级预防的敏感性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Dec 19;100(24):e153. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01297.
9
The Appropriate Management Of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures : A Single Institute Evaluation Using The VCF Monitor.骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的恰当管理:使用VCF监测仪的单机构评估
Acta Orthop Belg. 2017 Dec;83(4):506-511.
10
Efficacy of a multidisciplinary approach on postoperative morbidity and mortality of elderly patients with hip fracture.多学科方法对老年髋部骨折患者术后发病率和死亡率的疗效。
J Clin Anesth. 2019 Mar;53:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.029. Epub 2018 Oct 2.