• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种类型的反向串扰:序列调制及扩散模型的证据

Two types of backward crosstalk: Sequential modulations and evidence from the diffusion model.

作者信息

Durst Moritz, Janczyk Markus

机构信息

Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Department of Psychology, Cognition and Action.

Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Department of Psychology, Cognition and Action.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Feb;193:132-152. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.11.013.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.11.013
PMID:30639985
Abstract

In multitasking, the backward crosstalk effect (BCE) means that Task 1 performance is influenced by characteristics of Task 2. For example, (1) RT1 is shorter when the two responses are given on the same (compatible trial) compared with opposite sides (incompatible conflict-trial; compatibility-based BCE), and (2) RT1 is longer when Task 2 is a no-go relative to a go task (no-go BCE). We investigated the impact of recently experienced trial and conflict history on the size of such BCEs. Similar to the Gratton effect in standard conflict tasks, clear sequential modulations were observed for the two kinds of BCEs, which were present following (1) compatible trials and (2) go-trials and inverted following (1) incompatible and (2) no-go trials. Furthermore, recent evidence from mental chronometry studies suggests that the compatibility-based BCE is located inside the response selection stage, while the no-go-based BCE arises in motor execution. Against this background, a diffusion model analysis was carried out to reveal the reason(s) for the sequential modulations. As expected, for the compatibility-based BCE, changes in drift rate explain the sequential modulations, but for the no-go BCE changes in non-decision time are important. The present results indicate that both BCEs not only differ fundamentally in their underlying processes, but also in the way cognitive control is adjusted.

摘要

在多任务处理中,反向串扰效应(BCE)是指任务1的表现会受到任务2特征的影响。例如,(1)与在相反侧做出反应(不相容冲突试验;基于兼容性的BCE)相比,当在同一侧做出两种反应时(兼容试验),反应时1(RT1)更短;(2)当任务2是一个停止任务而不是执行任务时,RT1更长(停止BCE)。我们研究了近期经历的试验和冲突历史对这种BCE大小的影响。与标准冲突任务中的格拉顿效应类似,我们观察到这两种BCE都有明显的顺序调制,在(1)兼容试验和(2)执行试验之后出现,而在(1)不兼容试验和(2)停止试验之后则相反。此外,心理计时学研究的最新证据表明,基于兼容性的BCE位于反应选择阶段,而基于停止的BCE则出现在运动执行阶段。在此背景下,我们进行了扩散模型分析以揭示顺序调制的原因。正如预期的那样,对于基于兼容性的BCE,漂移率的变化解释了顺序调制,但对于停止BCE,非决策时间的变化很重要。目前的结果表明,这两种BCE不仅在其潜在过程上有根本差异,而且在认知控制的调整方式上也有差异。

相似文献

1
Two types of backward crosstalk: Sequential modulations and evidence from the diffusion model.两种类型的反向串扰:序列调制及扩散模型的证据
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Feb;193:132-152. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.11.013.
2
Smaller backward crosstalk effects for free choice tasks are not the result of immediate conflict adaptation.自由选择任务中较小的反向串扰效应并非即时冲突适应的结果。
Cogn Process. 2019 Feb;20(1):73-85. doi: 10.1007/s10339-018-0887-0. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
3
Sequential modulation of backward crosstalk and task-shielding in dual-tasking.双重任务中反向串扰和任务屏蔽的顺序调制
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 May;42(5):631-47. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000170. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
4
The motor locus of no-go backward crosstalk.停止-向后串扰的运动轨迹
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Dec;44(12):1931-1946. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000565. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
5
Temporal aspects of two types of backward crosstalk in dual-tasks: An analysis of continuous mouse-tracking data.双任务中两种类型的反向串扰的时间特征:连续鼠标追踪数据的分析。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Sep;76(9):2068-2083. doi: 10.1177/17470218221135603. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
6
Two types of between-task conflict trigger respective processing adjustments within one dual-task.两种类型的任务间冲突在一项双任务中引发各自的加工调整。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Nov;221:103450. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103450. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
7
Parallel dual-task processing and task-shielding in older and younger adults: Behavioral and diffusion model results.老年人和年轻人的并行双任务处理与任务屏蔽:行为学和扩散模型结果
Exp Aging Res. 2018 Mar-Apr;44(2):95-116. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2017.1422459. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
8
Backward crosstalk and the role of dimensional overlap within and between tasks.反向串扰以及任务内部和任务之间维度重叠的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Jul;188:139-147. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
9
Effects of a no-go Task 2 on Task 1 performance in dual - tasking: From benefits to costs.在双重任务中,禁做任务2对任务1表现的影响:从益处到代价。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Apr;79(3):796-806. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1257-6.
10
The Backward Crosstalk Effect Does Not Depend on the Degree of a Preceding Response Conflict.后向交叉效应不依赖于先前反应冲突的程度。
Exp Psychol. 2020 Sep;67(5):277-291. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000498. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Sequential adjustments of task-pair control in dual-task contexts: Examining the role of repetition priming effects at the level of task-pair sets and abstract control states.双任务情境中任务对控制的顺序调整:在任务对集和抽象控制状态层面考察重复启动效应的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Feb 18. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01694-0.
2
Task-order control in dual-tasks: Only marginal interactions between conflict at lower levels and higher processes of task organization.任务转换控制中的双重任务:仅在较低层次的冲突与较高层次的任务组织过程之间存在边缘交互。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1-23. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02876-9. Epub 2024 May 8.
3
The affective consequences of response inhibition determine no-go-based crosstalk effects in dual tasks.
反应抑制的情感后果决定了双重任务中基于不行走的串扰效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Dec;77(12):2533-2550. doi: 10.1177/17470218241231681. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
4
A spurious correlation between difference scores in evidence-accumulation model parameters.证据积累模型参数差异分数之间的虚假相关性。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Oct;55(7):3348-3369. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01956-8. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
5
S1-R2 and R1-R2 Backward Crosstalk Both Affect the Central Processing Stage.S1-R2和R1-R2反向串扰均影响中枢处理阶段。
J Cogn. 2020 Oct 6;3(1):37. doi: 10.5334/joc.121.
6
Two sources of task prioritization: The interplay of effector-based and task order-based capacity allocation in the PRP paradigm.任务优先级的两个来源:PRP范式中基于效应器和基于任务顺序的能力分配的相互作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Oct;82(7):3402-3414. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02071-6.
7
Parallel and serial task processing in the PRP paradigm: a drift-diffusion model approach.PRP 范式中的并行和串行任务处理:漂移-扩散模型方法。
Psychol Res. 2021 Jun;85(4):1529-1552. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01337-w. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
8
Item-specific proportion congruency (ISPC) modulates, but does not generate, the backward crosstalk effect.项目特异性比例一致性(ISPC)调节但不产生反向串扰效应。
Psychol Res. 2021 Apr;85(3):1093-1107. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01318-z. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
9
Introspection about backward crosstalk in dual-task performance.对双重任务表现中反向串扰的内省。
Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):605-617. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01282-3. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
10
Mood state and conflict adaptation: an update and a diffusion model analysis.心境状态与冲突适应:更新与扩散模型分析。
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):322-344. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01258-3. Epub 2019 Oct 28.