Suppr超能文献

两种类型的反向串扰:序列调制及扩散模型的证据

Two types of backward crosstalk: Sequential modulations and evidence from the diffusion model.

作者信息

Durst Moritz, Janczyk Markus

机构信息

Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Department of Psychology, Cognition and Action.

Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Department of Psychology, Cognition and Action.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Feb;193:132-152. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.11.013.

Abstract

In multitasking, the backward crosstalk effect (BCE) means that Task 1 performance is influenced by characteristics of Task 2. For example, (1) RT1 is shorter when the two responses are given on the same (compatible trial) compared with opposite sides (incompatible conflict-trial; compatibility-based BCE), and (2) RT1 is longer when Task 2 is a no-go relative to a go task (no-go BCE). We investigated the impact of recently experienced trial and conflict history on the size of such BCEs. Similar to the Gratton effect in standard conflict tasks, clear sequential modulations were observed for the two kinds of BCEs, which were present following (1) compatible trials and (2) go-trials and inverted following (1) incompatible and (2) no-go trials. Furthermore, recent evidence from mental chronometry studies suggests that the compatibility-based BCE is located inside the response selection stage, while the no-go-based BCE arises in motor execution. Against this background, a diffusion model analysis was carried out to reveal the reason(s) for the sequential modulations. As expected, for the compatibility-based BCE, changes in drift rate explain the sequential modulations, but for the no-go BCE changes in non-decision time are important. The present results indicate that both BCEs not only differ fundamentally in their underlying processes, but also in the way cognitive control is adjusted.

摘要

在多任务处理中,反向串扰效应(BCE)是指任务1的表现会受到任务2特征的影响。例如,(1)与在相反侧做出反应(不相容冲突试验;基于兼容性的BCE)相比,当在同一侧做出两种反应时(兼容试验),反应时1(RT1)更短;(2)当任务2是一个停止任务而不是执行任务时,RT1更长(停止BCE)。我们研究了近期经历的试验和冲突历史对这种BCE大小的影响。与标准冲突任务中的格拉顿效应类似,我们观察到这两种BCE都有明显的顺序调制,在(1)兼容试验和(2)执行试验之后出现,而在(1)不兼容试验和(2)停止试验之后则相反。此外,心理计时学研究的最新证据表明,基于兼容性的BCE位于反应选择阶段,而基于停止的BCE则出现在运动执行阶段。在此背景下,我们进行了扩散模型分析以揭示顺序调制的原因。正如预期的那样,对于基于兼容性的BCE,漂移率的变化解释了顺序调制,但对于停止BCE,非决策时间的变化很重要。目前的结果表明,这两种BCE不仅在其潜在过程上有根本差异,而且在认知控制的调整方式上也有差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验