Department of Neurology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons (M.S.V.E.), Columbia University, New York, NY.
Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health (M.S.V.E.), Columbia University, New York, NY.
Stroke. 2020 Nov;51(11):3406-3416. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030424. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
Disparities are differences in health outcomes among groups that originate from sources including historically experienced social injustice and broadly defined environmental exposures. Large health disparities exist, defined by many factors including race/ethnicity, sex, age, geography, and socioeconomic status. Studying disparities relies on measures of disease burden. Traditional measures, such as mortality, may be less applicable to neurological disorders, which often lead to substantial morbidity and lower quality of life, without necessarily causing death. Measures such as disability-adjusted life-years or healthy life expectancy may be more appropriate for assessing neurological disease and permit comparisons across diseases and communities. There are many approaches that can be used to study disparities. Analyses of population-based observational studies, patient registries, and administrative data all contribute to the understanding of disparities in humans. Animal and other experimental designs, including clinical trials, may be used to identify mechanisms and strategies to reduce disparities. All of these approaches have strengths and weaknesses. Ultimately, understanding and mitigating disparities will require use of all of these methods. Crucially, a focus on not only improving outcomes among all individuals in society but minimizing or eliminating differences between those with better outcomes and those who have historically been disadvantaged should drive the ongoing investigations into disparities. This review is focused on epidemiological approaches to examining the depth and determinants of racial-ethnic disparities in the United States related to stroke, stroke care, and stroke outcomes.
差异是指源于历史上经历的社会不公和广义的环境暴露等来源的群体在健康结果方面的差异。存在着许多健康差异,这些差异由许多因素定义,包括种族/民族、性别、年龄、地理位置和社会经济地位。研究差异依赖于疾病负担的衡量标准。传统的衡量标准,如死亡率,可能不太适用于神经疾病,因为神经疾病通常会导致大量的发病率和较低的生活质量,而不一定导致死亡。残疾调整生命年或健康期望寿命等衡量标准可能更适合评估神经疾病,并允许在疾病和社区之间进行比较。有许多方法可以用于研究差异。基于人群的观察性研究、患者登记和行政数据的分析都有助于了解人类的差异。动物和其他实验设计,包括临床试验,可用于确定减少差异的机制和策略。所有这些方法都有其优缺点。最终,理解和减轻差异将需要使用所有这些方法。至关重要的是,不仅要关注改善社会中所有个体的结果,还要关注减少或消除那些结果较好的人与那些历史上处于劣势的人之间的差异,这应该推动对差异的持续研究。本综述重点介绍了美国与中风、中风护理和中风结果相关的种族差异的流行病学研究方法,以及这些差异的深度和决定因素。