• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大老年人与普通成年人群体使用移动健康技术进行自我追踪的比较:横断面调查。

Comparison of Mobile Health Technology Use for Self-Tracking Between Older Adults and the General Adult Population in Canada: Cross-Sectional Survey.

机构信息

Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Research Chair in Digital Health, HEC Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 27;8(11):e24718. doi: 10.2196/24718.

DOI:10.2196/24718
PMID:33104517
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7717921/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The burden of population aging and chronic conditions has been reported worldwide. Older adults, especially those with high needs, experience social isolation and have high rates of emergency visits and limited satisfaction with the care they receive. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies present opportunities to address these challenges. To date, limited information is available on Canadian older adults' attitudes toward and use of mHealth technologies for self-tracking purposes-an area that is increasingly important and relevant during the COVID-19 era.

OBJECTIVE

This study presents contributions to an underresearched area on older adults and mHealth technology use. The aim of this study was to compare older adults' use of mHealth technologies to that of the general adult population in Canada and to investigate the factors that affect their use.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey on mHealth and digital self-tracking was conducted. A web-based questionnaire was administered to a national sample of 4109 Canadian residents who spoke either English or French. The survey instrument consisted of 3 sections assessing the following items: (1) demographic characteristics, health status, and comorbidities; (2) familiarity with and use of mHealth technologies (ie, mobile apps, consumer smart devices/wearables such as vital signs monitors, bathroom scales, fitness trackers, intelligent clothing); and (3) factors influencing the continued use of mHealth technologies.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed between the older adults and the general adult population in the use of smart technologies and internet (P<.001). Approximately 47.4% (323/682) of the older adults in the community reported using smartphones and 49.8% (340/682) indicated using digital tablets. Only 19.6% (91/463) of the older adults using smartphones/digital tablets reported downloading mobile apps, and 12.3% (47/383) of the older adults who heard of smart devices/wearables indicated using them. The majority of the mobile apps downloaded by older adults was health-related; interestingly, their use was sustained over a longer period of time (P=.007) by the older adults compared to that by the general population. Approximately 62.7% (428/682) of the older adults reported tracking their health measures, but the majority did so manually. Older adults with one or more chronic conditions were mostly nontrackers (odds ratio 0.439 and 0.431 for traditional trackers and digital trackers, respectively). No significant differences were observed between the older adults and the general adult population with regard to satisfaction with mHealth technologies and their intention to continue using them.

CONCLUSIONS

Leveraging mHealth technologies in partnership with health care providers and sharing of health/well-being data with health care professionals and family members remain very limited. A culture shift in the provision of care to older adults is deemed necessary to keep up with the development of mHealth technologies and the changing demographics and expectations of patients and their caregivers.

摘要

背景

人口老龄化和慢性病的负担在全球范围内都有报道。老年人,尤其是那些高需求的老年人,会经历社会孤立,急诊就诊率高,对所接受的护理满意度有限。移动健康 (mHealth) 技术提供了应对这些挑战的机会。迄今为止,关于加拿大老年人对 mHealth 技术用于自我跟踪的态度和使用情况的信息有限,而在 COVID-19 时代,这一领域越来越重要和相关。

目的

本研究对老年人和 mHealth 技术使用这一研究不足的领域做出了贡献。本研究的目的是比较老年人与加拿大一般成年人群体对 mHealth 技术的使用情况,并探讨影响他们使用的因素。

方法

对 mHealth 和数字自我跟踪进行了横断面调查。对一个全国性的 4109 名说法语或英语的加拿大居民进行了基于网络的问卷调查。调查工具包括 3 个部分,评估以下内容:(1)人口统计学特征、健康状况和合并症;(2)对 mHealth 技术的熟悉程度和使用情况(即移动应用程序、消费者智能设备/可穿戴设备,如生命体征监测器、浴室秤、健身追踪器、智能服装);(3)影响继续使用 mHealth 技术的因素。

结果

在智能技术和互联网的使用方面,社区中的老年人与一般成年人群体之间存在显著差异(P<.001)。大约 47.4%(323/682)的社区老年人使用智能手机,49.8%(340/682)表示使用数字平板电脑。只有 19.6%(91/463)的使用智能手机/数字平板电脑的老年人报告下载了移动应用程序,而 12.3%(47/383)听说过智能设备/可穿戴设备的老年人表示使用过。老年人下载的大多数移动应用程序都与健康相关;有趣的是,与一般人群相比,他们的使用时间更长(P=.007)。大约 62.7%(428/682)的老年人报告跟踪他们的健康指标,但大多数是手动跟踪。有一个或多个慢性病的老年人大多不跟踪(传统跟踪者和数字跟踪者的比值比分别为 0.439 和 0.431)。老年人与一般成年人群体在对 mHealth 技术的满意度和继续使用的意愿方面没有显著差异。

结论

与医疗保健提供者合作利用 mHealth 技术以及与医疗保健专业人员和家庭成员共享健康/幸福数据仍然非常有限。需要改变为老年人提供护理的方式,以跟上 mHealth 技术的发展以及患者及其护理人员的人口统计学和期望的变化。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Mobile Health Technology Use for Self-Tracking Between Older Adults and the General Adult Population in Canada: Cross-Sectional Survey.加拿大老年人与普通成年人群体使用移动健康技术进行自我追踪的比较:横断面调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 27;8(11):e24718. doi: 10.2196/24718.
2
Diffusion of the Digital Health Self-Tracking Movement in Canada: Results of a National Survey.加拿大数字健康自我追踪运动的传播:一项全国性调查的结果
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 2;20(5):e177. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9388.
3
Characterizing the US Population by Patterns of Mobile Health Use for Health and Behavioral Tracking: Analysis of the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey Data.通过移动健康用于健康和行为追踪的模式对美国人群进行特征描述:对美国国家癌症研究所健康信息全国趋势调查数据的分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 14;22(5):e16299. doi: 10.2196/16299.
4
Digital Information Technology Use and Patient Preferences for Internet-Based Health Education Modalities: Cross-Sectional Survey Study of Middle-Aged and Older Adults With Chronic Health Conditions.数字信息技术的使用与患者对基于互联网的健康教育方式的偏好:对患有慢性健康状况的中老年人的横断面调查研究
JMIR Aging. 2019 Apr 4;2(1):e12243. doi: 10.2196/12243.
5
Perceptions and Acceptance of mHealth in Patients With Cardiovascular Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study.移动医疗在心血管疾病患者中的认知和接受度:一项横断面研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Feb 4;7(2):e10117. doi: 10.2196/10117.
6
Attitudes Toward Using COVID-19 mHealth Tools Among Adults With Chronic Health Conditions: Secondary Data Analysis of the COVID-19 Impact Survey.慢性病患者对使用 COVID-19 移动医疗工具的态度:COVID-19 影响调查的二次数据分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Dec 17;8(12):e24693. doi: 10.2196/24693.
7
Factors Associated With Intention to Adopt mHealth Apps Among Dementia Caregivers With a Chronic Condition: Cross-sectional, Correlational Study.与患有慢性病的痴呆症照护者采用移动医疗应用意愿相关的因素:横断面、相关性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Aug 31;9(8):e27926. doi: 10.2196/27926.
8
Evaluating the prevalence and opportunity for technology use in chronic kidney disease patients: a cross-sectional study.评估慢性肾病患者使用技术的患病率和机会:一项横断面研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2018 Feb 2;19(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-0830-8.
9
Use of eHealth and mHealth technology by persons with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者使用电子健康和移动健康技术。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jan;27:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.09.036. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
10
Mobile and Wearable Technology Needs for Aging in Place: Perspectives from Older Adults and Their Caregivers and Providers.就地养老对移动和可穿戴技术的需求:老年人及其照顾者与服务提供者的观点
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;225:486-90.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a 24-hour movement index: exploring acceptability among Canadian parents.24小时运动指数的制定:探索加拿大父母的接受度。
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Jul 30;7:1571207. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1571207. eCollection 2025.
2
Generational differences in healthcare: the role of technology in the path forward.医疗保健中的代际差异:技术在前进道路上的作用。
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 26;13:1546317. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1546317. eCollection 2025.
3
Factors Associated With the Intention to Use mHealth Among Thai Middle-Aged Adults and Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Fitbit-Based Interventions for Healthy Lifestyle Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于 Fitbit 的健康生活方式干预措施的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 12;22(10):e23954. doi: 10.2196/23954.
2
Communication Technology Preferences of Hospitalized and Institutionalized Frail Older Adults During COVID-19 Confinement: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.COVID-19 隔离期间住院和机构内体弱老年人的通信技术偏好:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 18;8(9):e21845. doi: 10.2196/21845.
3
Social Preparedness in Response to Spatial Distancing Measures for Aged Care During COVID-19.
泰国中年人和老年人使用移动健康技术意愿的相关因素:横断面研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Mar 7;12:e63607. doi: 10.2196/63607.
4
Analysis of Factors Influencing the Willingness of Chinese Older Adults to Use mHealth Devices: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study.影响中国老年人使用移动健康设备意愿的因素分析:全国性横断面调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 4;27:e66804. doi: 10.2196/66804.
5
An Actor-Partner Interdependence Mediation Model for Assessing the Association Between Health Literacy and mHealth Use Intention in Dyads of Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Their Caregivers: Cross-Sectional Study.一种用于评估慢性心力衰竭患者及其照顾者二元组中健康素养与移动健康使用意愿之间关联的行为者-伙伴相互依赖中介模型:横断面研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Mar 6;13:e63805. doi: 10.2196/63805.
6
Effect of the Big Five Personality on the intention to use mHealth applications among the Chinese elderly: a national-based study.大五人格对中国老年人使用移动健康应用意愿的影响:一项基于全国的研究。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 30;16:1479204. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1479204. eCollection 2025.
7
Hybrid care model: Combining telemedicine and office visits for diabetes management in older adults with type 1 diabetes.混合护理模式:将远程医疗与门诊就诊相结合,用于1型糖尿病老年患者的糖尿病管理。
Med Res Arch. 2024 Sep;12(9). doi: 10.18103/mra.v12i9.5728. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
8
Navigating Through Innovation in Elderly's Health: A Scoping Review of Digital Health Interventions.探索老年人健康领域的创新:数字健康干预措施的范围综述
Public Health Rev. 2024 Dec 19;45:1607756. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2024.1607756. eCollection 2024.
9
Exploring observed and instructed mHealth use in the middle-aged and elderly people (MAEP): A social learning perspective.探索中老年人对移动健康的实际使用和指导性使用:社会学习视角
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 17;10:20552076241281214. doi: 10.1177/20552076241281214. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
10
Smart transition pathways and development incentive mechanism of China's smart community elderly care industry under market dominance: Considering a multi-subjective behavior game.市场主导下中国智慧社区养老产业的智能转型路径与发展激励机制——考虑多主体行为博弈
PLoS One. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0297696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297696. eCollection 2024.
新冠疫情期间应对老年护理空间隔离措施的社会准备情况
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jul;21(7):985-986. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.04.015. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
4
Long-term social distancing during COVID-19: A social isolation crisis among seniors?新冠疫情期间的长期社交距离:老年人面临社交隔离危机?
CMAJ. 2020 May 25;192(21):E588. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.75428.
5
The potential long-term impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on patients with non-communicable diseases in Europe: consequences for healthy ageing.COVID-19 疫情对欧洲非传染性疾病患者的潜在长期影响:对健康老龄化的影响。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Jul;32(7):1189-1194. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01601-4. Epub 2020 May 26.
6
Telehealth Home Support During COVID-19 Confinement for Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Mild Dementia: Survey Study.COVID-19 隔离期间针对社区居住的轻度认知障碍或轻度痴呆老年人的远程医疗居家支持:调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 22;22(5):e19434. doi: 10.2196/19434.
7
Factors that affect health information technology adoption by seniors: A systematic review.影响老年人采纳健康信息技术的因素:系统综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Nov;28(6):1827-1842. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13011. Epub 2020 May 7.
8
Impact of Home Quarantine on Physical Activity Among Older Adults Living at Home During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Interview Study.新冠疫情期间居家隔离对居家老年人身体活动的影响:定性访谈研究
JMIR Aging. 2020 May 7;3(1):e19007. doi: 10.2196/19007.
9
A prospective evaluation of telemonitoring use by seniors with chronic heart failure: Adoption, self-care, and empowerment.老年人慢性心力衰竭远程监测使用的前瞻性评估:采用、自我护理和赋权。
Health Informatics J. 2019 Dec;25(4):1800-1814. doi: 10.1177/1460458218799458. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
10
The use of mobile devices for physical activity tracking in older adults' everyday life.在老年人日常生活中使用移动设备进行身体活动追踪。
Digit Health. 2017 Nov 9;3:2055207617740088. doi: 10.1177/2055207617740088. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.