Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC), University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Updates Surg. 2021 Oct;73(5):2001-2007. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00902-7. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
The availability of intraoperative multimedia recording is increasing. Considering the growing call for physicians' accountability, it is inevitable that multimedia will play an important role in aiding quality control by improving the adequacy of operative reporting. However, the perspectives of medical professionals on this matter are poorly known. In this cross-disciplinary survey, we aimed to investigate the current viewpoints concerning the use of multimedia recording in the operating room. We conducted an electronic survey among all affiliated members of the Association of Surgeons of the Netherlands, the Dutch Urological Association and the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology containing questions regarding current use of intraoperative recording and the level of likelihood or objection for certain scenarios. The response rate was 27.8%. The survey encompasses 370 (54.5%) surgeons, 71 (10.5%) urologists, 80 (11.8%) gynecologists, and 158 (23.3%) residents in training. 52.4% of respondents feel that the currently used operative report is insufficient for future quality requirements. 58.5% think it is unlikely they would behave differently during surgery when intra-operative video recording is applied. 82.8% think it is unlikely that their surgical methods would be altered. 63.8% of respondents preferred only video registration when intraoperative recording is implemented. The majority of respondents agree that the current method of operative reporting is insufficient for future quality requirements. There is support for intraoperative video recording, however, legal transparency is needed before either intraoperative video or audio recording could be implemented to protect not only the patients, but also the healthcare providers.
术中多媒体记录的可用性正在增加。考虑到对医生问责制的呼声越来越高,多媒体在提高手术报告的充分性方面将不可避免地发挥重要作用,从而有助于质量控制。然而,医学专业人员对此事的看法却鲜为人知。在这项跨学科调查中,我们旨在调查当前关于在手术室使用多媒体记录的观点。我们在荷兰外科医生协会、荷兰泌尿科协会和荷兰妇产科协会的所有附属成员中进行了一项电子调查,其中包含有关术中记录的当前使用情况以及对某些情况的可能性或反对意见的问题。回复率为 27.8%。该调查涵盖了 370 名(54.5%)外科医生、71 名(10.5%)泌尿科医生、80 名(11.8%)妇科医生和 158 名(23.3%)住院医师。52.4%的受访者认为当前使用的手术报告不足以满足未来的质量要求。58.5%的人认为当术中录像应用时,他们在手术过程中的行为不太可能有所不同。82.8%的人认为他们的手术方法不太可能改变。63.8%的受访者希望在实施术中记录时只进行视频登记。大多数受访者认为当前的手术报告方法不足以满足未来的质量要求。支持术中录像,但在实施术中录像或录音之前,需要法律透明度,不仅要保护患者,还要保护医疗保健提供者。