Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021 Jan 1;86(1):62-72. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002530.
Patients report varied barriers to HIV care across multiple domains, but specific barrier patterns may be driven by underlying, but unobserved, behavioral profiles.
We traced a probability sample of patients lost to follow-up (>90 days late) as of July 31, 2015 from 64 clinics in Zambia. Among those found alive, we ascertained patient-reported reasons for care disruptions. We performed latent class analysis to identify patient subgroups with similar patterns of reasons reported and assessed the association between class membership and care status (ie, disengaged versus silently transferred to a new site).
Among 547 patients, we identified 5 profiles of care disruptions: (1) "Livelihood and Mobility" (30.6% of the population) reported work/school obligations and mobility/travel as reasons for care disruptions; (2) "Clinic Accessibility" (28.9%) reported challenges with attending clinic; (3) "Mobility and Family" (21.9%) reported family obligations, mobility/travel, and transport-related reasons; (4) "Doubting Need for HIV care" (10.2%) reported uncertainty around HIV status or need for clinical care, and (5) "Multidimensional Barriers to Care" (8.3%) reported numerous (mean 5.6) reasons across multiple domains. Patient profiles were significantly associated with care status. The "Doubting Need for HIV Care" class were mostly disengaged (97.9%), followed by the "Multidimensional Barriers to Care" (62.8%), "Clinic Accessibility" (62.4%), "Livelihood and Mobility" (43.6%), and "Mobility and Family" (23.5%) classes.
There are distinct HIV care disruption profiles that are strongly associated with patients' current engagement status. Interventions targeting these unique profiles may enable more effective and tailored strategies for improving HIV treatment outcomes.
患者在多个领域报告了不同的 HIV 护理障碍,但特定的障碍模式可能是由潜在的、但未被观察到的行为特征驱动的。
我们追溯了截至 2015 年 7 月 31 日,来自赞比亚 64 个诊所的超过 90 天逾期未随访的失访患者的概率样本。在发现仍存活的患者中,我们确定了患者报告的护理中断原因。我们进行了潜在类别分析,以确定具有相似报告原因模式的患者亚组,并评估了类别成员身份与护理状况(即脱离护理或无声转移到新地点)之间的关联。
在 547 名患者中,我们确定了 5 种护理中断模式:(1)“生计和流动性”(30.6%的人群)报告工作/学校义务和流动性/旅行是护理中断的原因;(2)“诊所可及性”(28.9%)报告了参加诊所的挑战;(3)“流动性和家庭”(21.9%)报告了家庭义务、流动性/旅行和与交通相关的原因;(4)“怀疑 HIV 护理需求”(10.2%)报告了对 HIV 状态或临床护理需求的不确定性,以及(5)“多维度护理障碍”(8.3%)报告了多个(平均 5.6 个)来自多个领域的原因。患者特征与护理状况显著相关。“怀疑 HIV 护理需求”类别大多脱离护理(97.9%),其次是“多维度护理障碍”(62.8%)、“诊所可及性”(62.4%)、“生计和流动性”(43.6%)和“流动性和家庭”(23.5%)类别。
存在明显的 HIV 护理中断模式,与患者当前的参与状态密切相关。针对这些独特模式的干预措施可能会为改善 HIV 治疗结果提供更有效和量身定制的策略。