Suppr超能文献

多组分、以患者为中心的护理干预对赞比亚患者体验和艾滋病毒治疗结果的影响:一项阶梯式楔形整群随机试验

Effect of a multicomponent, person-centred care intervention on client experience and HIV treatment outcomes in Zambia: a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial.

作者信息

Sikombe Kombatende, Mody Aaloke, Goss Charles W, Simbeza Sandra, Beres Laura K, Pry Jake M, Eshun-Wilson Ingrid, Sharma Anjali, Mukamba Njekwa, Mulenga Lloyd B, Rice Brian, Mutale Jacob, Zulu Dube Alida, Mulabe Musunge, Hargreaves James, Bolton Moore Carolyn, Holmes Charles B, Sikazwe Izukanji, Geng Elvin H

机构信息

Implementation Science Unit, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia; Department of Public Health Environments and Society, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Lancet HIV. 2025 Jan;12(1):e26-e39. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00264-9. Epub 2024 Dec 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recipients of health services value not only convenience but also respectful, kind, and helpful providers. To date, research to improve person-centred HIV treatment has focused on making services easier to access (eg, differentiated service delivery) rather than the interpersonal experience of care. We developed and evaluated a person-centred care (PCC) intervention targeting practices of health-care workers.

METHODS

Using a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised design, we randomly allocated 24 HIV clinics stratified by size in Zambia into four groups and introduced a PCC intervention that targeted caring aspects of the behaviour of health-care workers in one group every 6 months. The intervention entailed training and coaching for health-care workers on PCC practices (to capacitate), client experience assessment with feedback to facilities (to create opportunities), and small performance-based incentives (to motivate). In a probability sample of clients who were pre-trained on a client experience exit survey and masked to facility intervention status, we evaluated effects on client experience by use of mean score change and also proportion with poor encounters (ie, score of ≤8 on a 12-point survey instrument). We examined effects on missed visits (ie, >30 days late for next scheduled encounter) in all groups and retention in care at 15 months in group 1 and group 4 by use of electronic health records. We assessed effects on treatment success at 15 months (ie, HIV RNA concentration <400 copies per mL or adjudicated care status) in a prospectively enrolled subset of clients from group 1 and group 4. We estimated treatment effects with mixed-effects logistic regression, adjusting for sex, age, and baseline care status. This trial is registered at the Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry (202101847907585), and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 12, 2019, and Nov 30, 2021, 177 543 unique clients living with HIV made at least one visit to one of the 24 study clinics. The PCC intervention reduced the proportion of poor visits based on exit surveys from 147 (23·3%) of 632 during control periods to 33 (13·3%) of 249 during the first 6 months of intervention, and then to eight (3·5%) of 230 at 6 months or later (adjusted risk difference [aRD] for control vs ≥6 months intervention -16·9 percentage points, 95% CI -24·8 to -8·9). Among all adult scheduled appointments, the PCC intervention reduced the proportion of missed visits from 90 593 (25·3%) of 358 741 during control periods to 40 380 (22·6%) of 178 523 in the first 6 months, and then 52 288 (21·5%) of 243 350 at 6 months or later (aRD for control vs the intervention -4·2 percentage points, 95% CI -4·8 to -3·7). 15-month retention improved from 33 668 (80·2%) of 41 998 in control to 35 959 (83·6%) of 43 005 during intervention (aRD 5·9 percentage points, 95% CI 0·6 to 11·2), with larger effects in clients newly starting treatment (aRD 12·7 percentage points, 1·4 to 23·9). We found no effect on treatment success (based on viral load) in a nested subcohort (379 [83·7%] of 453 in the control phase vs 402 [83·8%] of 480 in the intervention phase; aRD 0·9 percentage points, -5·4 to 7·2).

INTERPRETATION

Improving the caring aspects of health-care worker behaviour is feasible in public health settings, enhances client experience, reduces missed appointments, and increases retention.

FUNDING

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

摘要

背景

医疗服务接受者不仅看重便利性,还重视医护人员的尊重、友善和帮助。迄今为止,改善以患者为中心的艾滋病治疗的研究主要集中在使服务更容易获得(例如,差异化服务提供),而非护理的人际体验。我们开发并评估了一项针对医护人员行为的以患者为中心的护理(PCC)干预措施。

方法

采用阶梯式、整群随机设计,我们将赞比亚按规模分层的24家艾滋病诊所随机分为四组,每6个月在一组中引入针对医护人员关怀行为方面的PCC干预措施。该干预措施包括对医护人员进行PCC实践培训和指导(以增强能力)、对设施进行客户体验评估并反馈(以创造机会)以及基于绩效的小额激励措施(以激励)。在对客户体验退出调查进行预培训且对设施干预状态不知情的概率抽样客户中,我们通过平均得分变化以及不良就医体验比例(即12分调查问卷上得分≤8分)评估对客户体验的影响。我们通过电子健康记录检查对所有组中漏诊(即下次预定就诊迟到>30天)的影响以及第1组和第4组在15个月时的护理留存率。我们在第1组和第4组前瞻性纳入的部分客户中评估对15个月时治疗成功(即HIV RNA浓度<400拷贝/mL或判定的护理状态)的影响。我们使用混合效应逻辑回归估计治疗效果,并对性别、年龄和基线护理状态进行调整。该试验已在泛非临床试验注册中心注册(202101847907585),且已完成。

结果

在2019年8月12日至2021年11月30日期间,177543名艾滋病毒感染者至少到24家研究诊所中的一家就诊过。PCC干预措施使基于退出调查的不良就医体验比例从对照期632次中的147次(23.3%)降至干预前6个月249次中的33次(13.3%),然后在6个月及以后降至230次中的8次(3.5%)(对照期与≥6个月干预期的调整风险差异[aRD]为-16.9个百分点,95%CI为-24.8至-8.9)。在所有成人预定就诊中,PCC干预措施使漏诊比例从对照期358741次中的90593次(25.3%)降至前6个月178523次中的40380次(22.6%),然后在6个月及以后降至243350次中的52288次(21.5%)(对照期与干预期的aRD为-4.2个百分点,95%CI为-4.8至-3.7)。15个月时的护理留存率从对照期41998人中的33668人(80.2%)提高到干预期43005人中的35959人(83.6 %)(aRD为5.9个百分点,95%CI为0.6至11.2),对新开始治疗的客户影响更大(aRD为12.7个百分点,1.4至23.9)。我们在一个嵌套亚组中未发现对治疗成功(基于病毒载量)的影响(对照期453人中的379人[83.7%]与干预期480人中的402人[83.8%];aRD为0.9个百分点,-5.4至7.2)。

解读

在公共卫生环境中改善医护人员行为的关怀方面是可行的,可提升客户体验,减少漏诊,并提高留存率。

资金来源

比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e3/12038181/d8b925ca428d/nihms-2065923-f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验