Park Jong-Ok, Koo Bon-Hoon, Kim Ji-Yean, Bai Dai-Seg, Chang Mun-Seon, Kim Oh-Lyong
Department of Psychology, College of Social Science, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea.
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2021 Jan;64(1):125-135. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2020.0090. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
This study aimed to validate the Korean version of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Update (K-RBANS).
We performed a retrospective analysis of 283 psychiatric and neurosurgery patients. To investigate the convergent validity of the K-RBANS, correlation analyses were performed for other intelligence and neuropsychological test results. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test a series of alternative plausible models of the K-RBANS. To analyze the various capabilities of the K-RBANS, we compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC).
Significant correlations were observed, confirming the convergent validity of the K-RBANS among the Total Scale Index (TSI) and indices of the K-RBANS and indices of intelligence (r=0.47-0.81; p<0.001) and other neuropsychological tests at moderate and above significance (r=0.41-0.63; p<0.001). Additionally, the results testing the construct validity of the K-RBANS showed that the second-order factor structure model (model 2, similar to an original factor structure of RBANS), which includes a first-order factor comprising five index scores (immediate memory, visuospatial capacity, language, attention, delayed memory) and one higher-order factor (TSI), was statistically acceptable. The comparative fit index (CFI) (CFI, 0.949) values and the goodness of fit index (GFI) (GFI, 0.942) values higher than 0.90 indicated an excellent fit. The root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) (RMSEA, 0.082) was considered an acceptable fit. Additionally, the factor structure of model 2 was found to be better and more valid than the other model in χ2 values (Δχ2=7.69, p<0.05). In the ROC analysis, the AUCs of the TSI and five indices were 0.716-0.837, and the AUC of TSI (AUC, 0.837; 95% confidence interval, 0.760-0.896) was higher than the AUCs of the other indices. The sensitivity and specificity of TSI were 77.66% and 78.12%, respectively.
The overall results of this study suggest that the K-RBANS may be used as a valid tool for the brief screening of neuropsychological patients in Korea.
本研究旨在验证韩国版的重复神经心理状态评估量表更新版(K-RBANS)。
我们对283例精神科和神经外科患者进行了回顾性分析。为了研究K-RBANS的收敛效度,对其他智力和神经心理测试结果进行了相关分析。采用验证性因素分析来检验K-RBANS的一系列替代合理模型。为了分析K-RBANS的各种能力,我们比较了受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)。
观察到显著相关性,证实了K-RBANS总量表指数(TSI)与K-RBANS各指数、智力指数(r = 0.47 - 0.81;p < 0.001)以及其他中度及以上显著水平的神经心理测试之间的收敛效度(r = 0.41 - 0.63;p < 0.001)。此外,检验K-RBANS结构效度的结果表明,二阶因素结构模型(模型2,类似于RBANS的原始因素结构)在统计学上是可接受的,该模型包括一个由五个指数得分(即时记忆、视觉空间能力、语言、注意力、延迟记忆)组成的一阶因素和一个高阶因素(TSI)。比较拟合指数(CFI)(CFI,0.949)值和拟合优度指数(GFI)(GFI,0.942)值高于0.90表明拟合良好。近似均方根误差(RMSEA)(RMSEA,0.082)被认为是可接受的拟合。此外,在χ2值方面,发现模型2的因素结构比其他模型更好、更有效(Δχ2 = 7.69,p < 0.05)。在ROC分析中,TSI和五个指数的AUC为0.716 - 0.837,TSI的AUC(AUC,0.837;95%置信区间,0.760 - 0.896)高于其他指数的AUC。TSI的敏感性和特异性分别为77.66%和78.12%。
本研究的总体结果表明,K-RBANS可作为韩国神经心理患者简短筛查的有效工具。