• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Study on Verification of Equivalence and Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacologic Dementia Prevention and Early Detection Contents : Non-Randomly Equivalent Design.一项关于非药物性痴呆预防与早期检测等效性及有效性验证的研究:非随机等效设计。
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2022 Mar;65(2):315-324. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2021.0153. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
2
The Korean Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status-Update : Psychiatric and Neurosurgery Patient Sample Validity.韩国可重复使用的神经心理状态评估量表更新版:精神科和神经外科患者样本的有效性
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2021 Jan;64(1):125-135. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2020.0090. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
3
Utility of the RBANS in detecting cognitive impairment associated with Alzheimer's disease: sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive powers.RBANS 在检测与阿尔茨海默病相关的认知障碍中的效用:敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测能力。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Sep;23(5):603-12. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
4
[The Japanese version of RBANS (Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status)].[RBANS的日文版(用于神经心理状态评估的可重复使用成套测验)]
No To Shinkei. 2002 Jun;54(6):463-71.
5
The Clinical Utility of the TYM and RBANS in a One-Stop Memory Clinic in Singapore: A Pilot Study.新加坡一站式记忆门诊中 TYM 和 RBANS 的临床效用:一项试点研究。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2019 Mar;32(2):68-73. doi: 10.1177/0891988718824034. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
6
The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status as a screening strategy for HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders.神经心理学状态评估的可重复性电池作为 HIV 相关神经认知障碍的筛查策略。
AIDS Care. 2021 Mar;33(3):357-363. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2020.1742859. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
7
The relationship between the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) and olfaction in patients referred for a dementia evaluation.用于评估神经心理状态的可重复性成套测验(RBANS)与因痴呆评估而转诊的患者嗅觉之间的关系。
Appl Neuropsychol. 2010 Jul;17(3):163-71. doi: 10.1080/09084281003715667.
8
Reliability and validity of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status in community-dwelling elderly.简易精神状态检查量表在社区老年人中的信度和效度。
Arch Med Sci. 2011 Oct;7(5):850-7. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2011.25561. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
9
The repeatable battery for the assessment of the neuropsychological status (RBANS): a diagnostic validity study in Greek elderly.重复神经心理状态评估测验 (RBANS):希腊老年人的诊断有效性研究。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019 Sep;31(9):1305-1312. doi: 10.1007/s40520-018-1076-9. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
10
Validation of the Sinhala version of the Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).
Ceylon Med J. 2016 Dec 30;61(4):167-170. doi: 10.4038/cmj.v61i4.8383.

本文引用的文献

1
The Korean Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status-Update : Psychiatric and Neurosurgery Patient Sample Validity.韩国可重复使用的神经心理状态评估量表更新版:精神科和神经外科患者样本的有效性
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2021 Jan;64(1):125-135. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2020.0090. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
2
Measurement Equivalence of "Touch-Screen" versus "Paper-Based" Assessments of OHRQoL: A Randomized Crossover Trial.“触屏”与“纸质”口腔健康相关生活质量评估的测量等效性:一项随机交叉试验。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020 May 29;12:199-204. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S248429. eCollection 2020.
3
The Prevalence of Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.痴呆症的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;73(3):1157-1166. doi: 10.3233/JAD-191092.
4
Global Clinical Dementia Rating Score of 0.5 May Not Be an Accurate Criterion to Identify Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment.全球临床痴呆评定量表评分为0.5可能并非识别轻度认知障碍个体的准确标准。
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2019 Sep 10;3(1):233-239. doi: 10.3233/ADR-190126.
5
Raw-score equivalence of computer-assisted and paper versions of WISC-V.WISC-V 计算机辅助版与纸笔版的原始分数等效性。
Psychol Serv. 2019 May;16(2):213-220. doi: 10.1037/ser0000295. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
6
Establishing Measurement Equivalence Across Computer- and Paper-Based Tests of Spatial Cognition.建立空间认知的计算机化测试和纸笔测试之间的测量等效性。
Hum Factors. 2018 May;60(3):340-350. doi: 10.1177/0018720817747731. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
7
Clinical data interchange standards consortium: A bridge to overcome data standardisation.临床数据交换标准协会:一座克服数据标准化问题的桥梁。
Perspect Clin Res. 2013 Apr;4(2):115-6. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.111779.
8
Development of the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Packet (CERAD-K): clinical and neuropsychological assessment batteries.韩国版阿尔茨海默病评估数据包注册联盟(CERAD-K)的开发:临床和神经心理学评估量表
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002 Jan;57(1):P47-53. doi: 10.1093/geronb/57.1.p47.
9
Measuring cognitive change in a cohort of patients with Alzheimer's disease.测量一组阿尔茨海默病患者的认知变化。
Stat Med. 2000;19(11-12):1421-32. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000615/30)19:11/12<1421::aid-sim434>3.0.co;2-p.
10
The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules.临床痴呆评定量表(CDR):当前版本及评分规则。
Neurology. 1993 Nov;43(11):2412-4. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a.

一项关于非药物性痴呆预防与早期检测等效性及有效性验证的研究:非随机等效设计。

A Study on Verification of Equivalence and Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacologic Dementia Prevention and Early Detection Contents : Non-Randomly Equivalent Design.

作者信息

Jeong Hyun-Seok, Kim Oh-Lyong, Koo Bon-Hoon, Kim Ki-Hyun, Kim Gi-Hwan, Bai Dai-Seg, Kim Ji-Yean, Chang Mun-Seon, Kim Hye-Geum

机构信息

Department of Psychology, College of Social Science, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.

Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2022 Mar;65(2):315-324. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2021.0153. Epub 2022 Feb 17.

DOI:10.3340/jkns.2021.0153
PMID:35168310
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8918252/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to verify the equivalence and effectiveness of the tablet-administered Korean Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (K-RBANS) for the prevention and early detection of dementia.

METHODS

Data from 88 psychiatry and neurology patient samples were examined to evaluate the equivalence between tablet and paper administrations of the K-RBANS using a non-randomly equivalent group design. We calculated the prediction scores of the tablet-administered K-RBANS based on demographics and covariate-test scores for focal tests using norm samples and tested format effects. In addition, we compared the receiver operating characteristic curves to confirm the effectiveness of the K-RBANS for preventing and detecting dementia.

RESULTS

In the analysis of raw scores, line orientation showed a significant difference (t=-2.94, p<0.001), and subtests showed small to large effect sizes (0.04-0.86) between paper- and tablet-administered K-RBANS. To investigate the format effect, we compared the predicted scaled scores of the tablet sample to the scaled scores of the norm sample. Consequently, a small effect size (d≤0.20) was observed in most of the subtests, except word list and story recall, which showed a medium effect size (d=0.21), while picture naming and subtests of delayed memory showed significant differences in the one-sample t-test. In addition, the area under the curve of the total scale index (TSI) (0.827; 95% confidence interval, 0.738-0.916) was higher than that of the five indices, ranging from 0.688 to 0.820. The sensitivity and specificity of TSI were 80% and 76%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The overall results of this study suggest that the tablet-administered K-RBANS showed significant equivalence to the norm sample, although some subtests showed format effects, and it may be used as a valid tool for the brief screening of patients with neuropsychological disorders in Korea.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证用于痴呆预防和早期检测的平板电脑版韩国可重复神经心理状态评估量表(K-RBANS)的等效性和有效性。

方法

使用非随机等效组设计,对88例精神病学和神经病学患者样本的数据进行检查,以评估平板电脑版和纸质版K-RBANS之间的等效性。我们根据人口统计学和焦点测试的协变量测试分数,使用常模样本计算平板电脑版K-RBANS的预测分数,并测试格式效应。此外,我们比较了受试者工作特征曲线,以确认K-RBANS在预防和检测痴呆方面的有效性。

结果

在原始分数分析中,线条方向显示出显著差异(t=-2.94,p<0.001),纸质版和平板电脑版K-RBANS之间的子测试显示出小到中等的效应量(0.04-0.86)。为了研究格式效应,我们将平板电脑样本的预测量表分数与常模样本的量表分数进行了比较。因此,除了单词列表和故事回忆显示中等效应量(d=0.21)外,大多数子测试中观察到小效应量(d≤0.20),而图片命名和延迟记忆子测试在单样本t检验中显示出显著差异。此外,总量表指数(TSI)的曲线下面积(0.827;95%置信区间,0.738-0.916)高于五个指数的曲线下面积,范围为0.688至0.820。TSI的敏感性和特异性分别为80%和76%。

结论

本研究的总体结果表明,尽管一些子测试显示出格式效应,但平板电脑版K-RBANS与常模样本显示出显著等效性,它可能被用作韩国神经心理障碍患者简短筛查的有效工具。