Anesthesiology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Anesthesiology, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Jan;46(1):61-72. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101995. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
Periarticular local infiltration analgesia (LIA) is integral to multimodal analgesia following total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, the duration of analgesia using traditional long-acting local anesthetics is often insufficient. LIA with slow-release liposomal bupivacaine may provide extended analgesia, but evidence of efficacy beyond the first 24 hours is conflicting. This meta-analysis compares the effects of periarticular liposomal and plain bupivacaine LIA on day 2 analgesic outcomes post-TKA. Trials comparing liposomal and plain bupivacaine LIA for TKA were sought. The two coprimary outcomes were (1) cumulative oral morphine equivalent consumption and (2) difference in area under the curve (AUC) of pooled rest pain scores on day 2 (24-48 hours) post-TKA. We also evaluated pain and analgesic consumption on day 3 (48-72 hours), functional recovery, length of hospital stay, patient satisfaction; and opioid-related side effects. Data were pooled using random-effects modeling. Seventeen trials (1836 patients) were analyzed. Comparing liposomal versus plain bupivacaine LIA for TKA failed to detect differences in morphine consumption and pain AUC on day 2 postoperatively, with mean differences of 0.54 mg (95% CI -5.09 to 6.18) and 0.08 cm/hour (95% CI -0.19 to 0.35), respectively (high-quality evidence). Secondary outcome analysis did not uncover any additional analgesic, functional or safety advantages to liposomal bupivacaine on postoperative day 2 or 3. Results indicate that liposomal and plain bupivacaine LIAs are not different for extended postoperative analgesic outcomes, including pain control, opioid consumption, as well as functional and safety outcomes on days 2 and 3 post-TKA. High-quality evidence does not support using liposomal bupivacaine LIA for TKA.
关节周围局部浸润镇痛(LIA)是全膝关节置换术后多模式镇痛的重要组成部分;然而,传统长效局部麻醉药的镇痛持续时间往往不足。使用缓释脂质体布比卡因的 LIA 可能提供更长时间的镇痛,但超过 24 小时的疗效证据存在冲突。这项荟萃分析比较了关节周围脂质体和普通布比卡因 LIA 在 TKA 后第 2 天的镇痛效果。我们寻找了比较脂质体和普通布比卡因 LIA 用于 TKA 的试验。两个主要结果是(1)累积口服吗啡等效消耗量和(2)TKA 后第 2 天(24-48 小时) pooled 静息痛评分曲线下面积(AUC)的差异。我们还评估了第 3 天(48-72 小时)的疼痛和镇痛消耗、功能恢复、住院时间、患者满意度;以及阿片类药物相关的副作用。使用随机效应模型对数据进行了汇总。分析了 17 项试验(1836 名患者)。比较脂质体与普通布比卡因 LIA 用于 TKA 未能检测到术后第 2 天吗啡消耗和疼痛 AUC 的差异,平均差异分别为 0.54mg(95%CI-5.09 至 6.18)和 0.08cm/hour(95%CI-0.19 至 0.35)(高质量证据)。次要结果分析未发现脂质体布比卡因在术后第 2 天或第 3 天在镇痛、功能或安全性方面具有任何额外优势。结果表明,脂质体和普通布比卡因 LIA 在延长术后镇痛效果方面没有差异,包括疼痛控制、阿片类药物消耗以及 TKA 后第 2 天和第 3 天的功能和安全性结果。高质量证据不支持在 TKA 中使用脂质体布比卡因 LIA。