Emergency Department, CHU Saint-Pierre, Bruxelles, Belgium
Emergency Department, CHU Saint-Pierre, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Sex Transm Infect. 2021 Aug;97(5):329-333. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2020-054714. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
Postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) is a recommended public health intervention after a sexual assault to prevent HIV infection.
We conducted a retrospective case-control study on how use of a single-tablet regimen (STR) of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (Stribild) affected adherence to PEP and attendance of a follow-up visit to the STI clinic compared with those who received a multitablet regimen (MTR). Data from sexual assault victims consulting for PEP were prospectively recorded between January 2011 and December 2017. Data were systematically collected on patient demographics, time of medical contact, source risk factors, type of exposure, attendance to follow-up visit, reported completion of PEP and adherence based on pharmacy records.
A total of 422 patients received PEP following a sexual assault, of whom 52% had documented completion of a 28-day PEP regimen and 71% attended a follow-up clinic visit. Patients who received an elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF)-based STR had a similar likelihood of attending their first follow-up visit (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.64 to 1.48, p=0.90) but were more likely to complete the PEP regimen (OR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.16 to 2.50, p=0.007). After adjusting for confounders, those who were prescribed an STR regimen were more likely to complete the PEP regimen (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.09 to 2.53, p=0.019) than those who were prescribed an MTR such as stavudine/lamivudine/lopinavir/ritonavir or zidovudine/lamivudine/indinavir/ritonavir.
Sexual assault victims who were prescribed an STR based on EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF were more likely to complete PEP than those who were prescribed an MTR.
暴露后预防(PEP)是一种推荐的公共卫生干预措施,用于在性侵犯后预防 HIV 感染。
我们进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究,以了解使用艾维雷格/考比司他/恩曲他滨/替诺福韦富马酸单片制剂(Stribild)与接受多片剂方案(MTR)相比,对 PEP 的依从性和随访到性传播感染(STI)诊所的影响。2011 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月,前瞻性记录了咨询 PEP 的性侵犯受害者的数据。系统收集了患者人口统计学、医疗接触时间、来源风险因素、暴露类型、随访就诊、报告完成 PEP 情况以及基于药房记录的依从性等数据。
共有 422 名患者在性侵犯后接受了 PEP,其中 52%的患者记录了完成 28 天 PEP 方案,71%的患者随访就诊。接受艾维雷格/考比司他/恩曲他滨/替诺福韦富马酸单片制剂(EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF)方案的患者首次随访就诊的可能性相似(比值比:0.97;95%置信区间:0.64 至 1.48,p=0.90),但更有可能完成 PEP 方案(比值比:1.70;95%置信区间:1.16 至 2.50,p=0.007)。调整混杂因素后,接受 STR 方案的患者更有可能完成 PEP 方案(比值比:1.66,95%置信区间:1.09 至 2.53,p=0.019),而接受多片剂方案(如司他夫定/拉米夫定/洛匹那韦/利托那韦或齐多夫定/拉米夫定/茚地那韦/利托那韦)的患者则不然。
接受基于 EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF 的 STR 方案的性侵犯受害者更有可能完成 PEP,而不是接受 MTR 方案的患者。