White Douglas A E, Jewett Montana, Burns Molly, Rodriguez Cedric, Pinto Cinthya Mujica, Regalado Gabriela, Del Angel Kevin, Larkin Hillary J, Anderson Erik S
Department of Emergency Medicine, Alameda Health System, Oakland, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 28;20(3):e0320690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320690. eCollection 2025.
Many emergency department (ED) patients after a sexual assault face barriers to receiving HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). We implemented a quality improvement initiative which updated the sexual assault electronic health record (EHR) template and made available free, full-course PEP treatment packs for use at provider discretion. The aim of this study was to compare the receipt of HIV PEP for ED patients receiving sexual assault care before and after the initiative.
This was a retrospective, quasi-experimental, pre-post study of all ED patients who completed a sexual assault examination between June 1, 2022 - January 31, 2023 (pre-intervention) and March 1, 2023 - October 31, 2023 (post-intervention). An odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to determine the initiative's effect on PEP prescribing. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated the independent effect of the initiative while controlling for potential confounders.
Of the 235 sexual assault examinations, 117 (49.8%) were during the pre-intervention and 118 (50.2%) were during the post-intervention periods. Pre-intervention, the mean age was 33.0 years (standard deviation [SD] 12.3), 94.0% were female, 30.8% Black, 31.6% Latinx, and 28.2% White. Post-intervention, the mean age was 29.2 years (SD 12.6), 90.7% were female, 42.4% Black, 28.8% Latinx, and 17.8% White. Patients were more likely to receive HIV PEP post-intervention (33/118, 28.0%) than pre-intervention (11/117, 9.4%) (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.8 to 7.8). The independent effect of the initiative on HIV PEP prescribing remained significant after controlling for demographics (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.6 to 8.0), assault characteristics (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.6 to 11.1), and provider experience (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.7 to 7.5).
The availability of HIV PEP treatment packs plus a modification to the EHR template led to a significant increase in the provision of HIV PEP for ED patients after sexual assault.
许多遭受性侵犯后的急诊科(ED)患者在接受艾滋病毒暴露后预防(PEP)方面面临障碍。我们实施了一项质量改进举措,更新了性侵犯电子健康记录(EHR)模板,并提供免费的全程PEP治疗包,供医护人员酌情使用。本研究的目的是比较该举措实施前后接受性侵犯护理的急诊科患者接受艾滋病毒PEP的情况。
这是一项回顾性、准实验性的前后对照研究,研究对象为2022年6月1日至2023年1月31日(干预前)和2023年3月1日至2023年10月31日(干预后)期间完成性侵犯检查的所有急诊科患者。计算优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)以确定该举措对PEP处方的影响。多变量逻辑回归模型在控制潜在混杂因素的同时估计该举措的独立影响。
在235例性侵犯检查中,117例(49.8%)发生在干预前,118例(50.2%)发生在干预后。干预前,平均年龄为33.0岁(标准差[SD]12.3),94.0%为女性,30.8%为黑人,31.6%为拉丁裔,28.2%为白人。干预后,平均年龄为29.2岁(SD 12.6),90.7%为女性,42.4%为黑人,28.8%为拉丁裔,17.8%为白人。干预后患者接受艾滋病毒PEP的可能性(33/118,28.0%)高于干预前(11/117,9.4%)(OR 3.7,95%CI 1.8至7.8)。在控制人口统计学因素(OR 3.6,95%CI 1.6至8.0)、性侵犯特征(OR 4.2,95%CI 1.6至11.1)和医护人员经验(OR 3.5,95%CI 1.7至7.5)后,该举措对艾滋病毒PEP处方的独立影响仍然显著。
艾滋病毒PEP治疗包的可用性以及EHR模板的修改导致遭受性侵犯的急诊科患者接受艾滋病毒PEP的比例显著增加。