Department of Physical Education, Virginia Military Institute, 208 Cormack Hall, Lexington, VA, 24450, USA.
Department of Kinesiology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, 22801, USA.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Jan;121(1):23-66. doi: 10.1007/s00421-020-04534-y. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
To critically examine the research on novel supplements and strategies designed to enhance carbohydrate delivery and/or availability.
Narrative review.
Available data would suggest that there are varying levels of effectiveness based on the supplement/supplementation strategy in question and mechanism of action. Novel carbohydrate supplements including multiple transportable carbohydrate (MTC), modified carbohydrate (MC), and hydrogels (HGEL) have been generally effective at modifying gastric emptying and/or intestinal absorption. Moreover, these effects often correlate with altered fuel utilization patterns and/or glycogen storage. Nevertheless, performance effects differ widely based on supplement and study design. MTC consistently enhances performance, but the magnitude of the effect is yet to be fully elucidated. MC and HGEL seem unlikely to be beneficial when compared to supplementation strategies that align with current sport nutrition recommendations. Combining carbohydrate with other ergogenic substances may, in some cases, result in additive or synergistic effects on metabolism and/or performance; however, data are often lacking and results vary based on the quantity, timing, and inter-individual responses to different treatments. Altering dietary carbohydrate intake likely influences absorption, oxidation, and and/or storage of acutely ingested carbohydrate, but how this affects the ergogenicity of carbohydrate is still mostly unknown.
In conclusion, novel carbohydrate supplements and strategies alter carbohydrate delivery through various mechanisms. However, more research is needed to determine if/when interventions are ergogenic based on different contexts, populations, and applications.
批判性地审查旨在增强碳水化合物输送和/或可用性的新型补充剂和策略的研究。
叙述性综述。
现有数据表明,根据具体的补充剂/补充策略以及作用机制,其有效性存在不同程度的差异。新型碳水化合物补充剂,包括多种可运输碳水化合物(MTC)、改性碳水化合物(MC)和水凝胶(HGEL),通常在改变胃排空和/或肠道吸收方面具有有效性。此外,这些影响通常与改变的燃料利用模式和/或糖原储存有关。然而,基于补充剂和研究设计的不同,性能效果差异很大。MTC 始终能提高性能,但具体的效果仍有待充分阐明。与当前运动营养建议一致的补充策略相比,MC 和 HGEL 似乎没有益处。将碳水化合物与其他功效物质结合使用,在某些情况下可能会对代谢和/或性能产生附加或协同作用;然而,数据往往缺乏,结果也因不同的处理方法的数量、时间和个体差异而有所不同。改变膳食碳水化合物的摄入量可能会影响急性摄入碳水化合物的吸收、氧化和/或储存,但这如何影响碳水化合物的功效性在很大程度上仍不清楚。
总之,新型碳水化合物补充剂和策略通过各种机制改变碳水化合物的输送。然而,需要更多的研究来确定在不同的情况下、人群和应用中,干预措施是否具有功效性。