Showa University Research Administration Center (SURAC), Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 15;2(2):CD013109. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013109.pub2.
People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) requiring dialysis are at a particularly high risk of cardiovascular death and morbidity. Several clinical studies suggested that aldosterone antagonists would be a promising treatment option for people undergoing dialysis. However, the clinical efficacy and potential harm of aldosterone antagonists for people with CKD on dialysis has yet to be determined.
This review aimed to evaluate the benefits and harms of aldosterone antagonists, both non-selective (spironolactone) and selective (eplerenone), in comparison to control (placebo or standard care) in people with CKD requiring haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD).
We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 5 August 2020 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.
We included parallel randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cross-over RCTs, and quasi-RCTs (where group allocation is by a method that is not truly random, such as alternation, assignment based on alternate medical records, date of birth, case record number, or other predictable methods) that compared aldosterone antagonists with placebo or standard care in people with CKD requiring dialysis.
Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias for included studies. We used a random-effects model meta-analysis to perform a quantitative synthesis of the data. We used the I² statistic to measure heterogeneity among the studies in each analysis. We indicated summary estimates as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, or standardised mean differences (SMD) if different scales were used, with their 95% confidence interval (CI). We assessed the certainty of the evidence for each of the main outcomes using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.
We included 16 studies (14 parallel RCTs and two cross-over RCTs) involving a total of 1446 participants. Thirteen studies compared spironolactone to placebo or standard care and one study compared eplerenone to a placebo. Most included studies had an unclear or high risk of bias. Compared to control, aldosterone antagonists probably reduced the risk of death (any cause) for people with CKD requiring dialysis (9 studies, 1119 participants: RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.67; I² = 0%; moderate certainty of evidence). Aldosterone antagonist probably decreased the risk of death due to cardiovascular disease (6 studies, 908 participants: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.64; I² = 0%; moderate certainty of evidence) and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular morbidity (3 studies, 328 participants: RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.76; I² = 0%; moderate certainty of evidence). While aldosterone antagonists probably increased risk of gynaecomastia compared with control (4 studies, 768 participants: RR 5.95, 95% CI 1.93 to 18.3; I² = 0%; moderate certainty of evidence), aldosterone antagonists may make little or no difference to the risk of hyperkalaemia (9 studies, 981 participants: RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.78; I² = 47%; low certainty of evidence). Aldosterone antagonists had a marginal effect on left ventricular mass among participants undergoing dialysis (8 studies, 633 participants: SMD -0.42, 95% CI -0.78 to 0.05; I² = 77%). In people with CKD requiring dialysis received aldosterone antagonists compared to control, there were 72 fewer deaths from all causes per 1000 participants (95% CI 47 to 98) with a number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) of 14 (95% CI 10 to 21) and for gynaecomastia were 26 events per 1000 participants (95% CI 15 to 39) with a number need to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) of 38 (95% CI 26 to 68).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on moderate certainty of the evidence, aldosterone antagonists probably reduces the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death and probably reduces morbidity due to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease in people with CKD requiring dialysis. For the adverse effect of gynaecomastia, the risk was increased compared to control. For this outcome, the absolute risk was lower than the absolute risk of death. It is hoped the three large ongoing studies will provide better certainty of evidence.
需要透析的慢性肾脏病 (CKD) 患者尤其容易发生心血管死亡和发病。几项临床研究表明,醛固酮拮抗剂可能是透析患者的一种有前途的治疗选择。然而,醛固酮拮抗剂对透析的 CKD 患者的临床疗效和潜在危害尚未确定。
本综述旨在评估非选择性(螺内酯)和选择性(依普利酮)醛固酮拮抗剂与安慰剂或标准护理相比,在需要血液透析 (HD) 或腹膜透析 (PD) 的 CKD 患者中的获益和危害。
我们使用与本综述相关的检索词,检索了 Cochrane 肾脏病和移植组注册研究,截至 2020 年 8 月 5 日。通过检索 CENTRAL、MEDLINE 和 EMBASE、会议论文集、国际临床试验注册中心 (ICTRP) 检索门户和 ClinicalTrials.gov 来确定登记册中的研究。
我们纳入了平行随机对照试验 (RCT)、交叉 RCT 和准 RCT(组分配不是真正随机的方法,例如交替、基于交替病历、出生日期、病历号或其他可预测方法的分配),将醛固酮拮抗剂与安慰剂或标准护理在需要透析的 CKD 患者中进行比较。
两名综述作者独立提取数据并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。我们使用随机效应模型荟萃分析对数据进行定量综合。我们使用 I² 统计量来衡量每项分析中研究之间的异质性。我们将汇总估计值表示为二分类结局的风险比 (RR)、连续结局的均数差 (MD) 或如果使用不同的量表,则表示为标准化均数差 (SMD),并给出 95%置信区间 (CI)。我们使用 GRADE(推荐、评估、制定和评价)方法评估主要结局的证据确定性。
我们纳入了 16 项研究(14 项平行 RCT 和 2 项交叉 RCT),共涉及 1446 名参与者。13 项研究比较了螺内酯与安慰剂或标准护理,1 项研究比较了依普利酮与安慰剂。大多数纳入的研究存在偏倚风险高或不清楚。与对照组相比,醛固酮拮抗剂可能降低了需要透析的 CKD 患者的死亡(任何原因)风险(9 项研究,1119 名参与者:RR 0.45,95%CI 0.30 至 0.67;I² = 0%;证据确定性为中度)。醛固酮拮抗剂可能降低了心血管疾病死亡风险(6 项研究,908 名参与者:RR 0.37,95%CI 0.22 至 0.64;I² = 0%;证据确定性为中度)和心血管和脑血管发病率(3 项研究,328 名参与者:RR 0.38,95%CI 0.18 至 0.76;I² = 0%;证据确定性为中度)。虽然醛固酮拮抗剂可能会增加与对照组相比的男性乳房发育的风险(4 项研究,768 名参与者:RR 5.95,95%CI 1.93 至 18.3;I² = 0%;证据确定性为中度),但醛固酮拮抗剂对高钾血症的风险可能影响不大(9 项研究,981 名参与者:RR 1.41,95%CI 0.72 至 2.78;I² = 47%;证据确定性为低)。在接受透析的 CKD 患者中,醛固酮拮抗剂对左心室质量有一定影响(8 项研究,633 名参与者:SMD -0.42,95%CI -0.78 至 0.05;I² = 77%)。与对照组相比,接受透析的 CKD 患者使用醛固酮拮抗剂后,每 1000 名参与者中有 72 人因各种原因死亡(95%CI 47 至 98),需要治疗以获得额外获益的人数(NNTB)为 14(95%CI 10 至 21),而男性乳房发育的需要治疗以获得额外不良结局的人数(NNTH)为 38(95%CI 26 至 68)。
基于证据确定性为中度,醛固酮拮抗剂可能降低需要透析的 CKD 患者的全因和心血管死亡风险,并可能降低心血管和脑血管疾病的发病率。对于男性乳房发育的不良影响,与对照组相比,风险增加。对于这种结局,绝对风险低于死亡的绝对风险。希望正在进行的三项大型研究将提供更高确定性的证据。