No difference in gait pattern between a short collum femoris-preserving and a conventional stem: 44 randomised total hip arthroplasty patients stem evaluated after 2 years.

BACKGROUND

The uncemented collum femoris-preserving (CFP) stem offers preservation of the femoral neck and a more conservative soft tissue resection, which may facilitate a more normal walking pattern. We used gait analysis to evaluate if patients operated with a CFP stem showed more favourable hip kinematics and kinetics when compared with a group of patients operated with a conventional uncemented stem.

METHODS

44 patients randomised to receive either a CFP or a Corail stem were studied and were operated using a direct lateral incision. Gait analysis was performed 2 years after the operation with a 12-camera motion capture system and 2 force plates. Hip kinematics and kinetics were analysed and 66 subjects served as controls.

RESULTS

None of the variables: speed, stride, cadence and stance showed any statistical significant difference between the 2 study groups. Neither did the hip kinematics and kinetics. Compared to controls, patients operated with the CFP stem showed an increased stance (62.5% vs. 61.1%, 0.006) and decreased hip abduction (-2.1° vs. -6.5°). Patients operated with the Corail stem showed decreased speed (1.18 vs. 1.23 m/second), and stride length (1.26 vs. 1.33 m), decreased hip extension (-7.5° vs. -12.8°) and range of hip flexion/extension (38° vs. 40.9°), as well as their hip adduction that was increased (6.3° vs. 4°), whereas their hip abduction was reduced (-2.8° vs. -6.5°), ( 0.004) compared to the controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a CFP stem did not significantly influence any of the gait parameters studied when compared to a standard stem, but still both stems studied were associated with gait deviations when compared to controls. Whether these differences could be attributed to the stem used, the underlying hip disease, or both is still unknown.