• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗韧性(RiH):一项纵向研究计划方案。

Resilience in Healthcare (RiH): a longitudinal research programme protocol.

机构信息

SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway

SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 26;10(10):e038779. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038779.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038779
PMID:33109657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7592282/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Over the past three decades, extensive research has been undertaken to understand the elements of what constitutes high quality in healthcare. Yet, much of this research has been conducted on individual elements and their specific challenges. Hence, goals other than understanding the complex of factors and elements that comprises quality in healthcare have been privileged. This lack of progress has led to the conclusion that existing approaches to research are not able to address the inherent complexity of healthcare systems as characterised by a significant degree of performance variability within and across system levels, and what makes them resilient. A shift is, therefore, necessary in such approaches. Resilience in Healthcare (RiH) adopts an approach comprising a comprehensive research programme that models the capacity of healthcare systems and stakeholders to adapt to changes, variations and/or disruptions: that is, resilience. As such, RiH offers a fresh approach capable of capturing and illuminating the complexity of healthcare and how high-quality care can be understood and advanced.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Methodologically, to illuminate what constitutes quality in healthcare, it is necessary to go beyond single-site, case-based studies. Instead, there is a need to engage in multi-site, cross-national studies and engage in long-term multidisciplinary collaboration between national and international researchers interacting with multiple healthcare stakeholders. By adopting such processes, multiple partners and a multidisciplinary orientation, the 5-year RiH research programme aims to confront these challenges and accelerate current understandings about and approaches to researching healthcare quality.The RiH research programme adopts a longitudinal collaborative interactive design to capture and illuminate resilience as part of healthcare quality in different healthcare settings in Norway and in five other countries. It combines a meta-analysis of detailed empirical research in Norway with cross-country comparison from Australia, Japan, Netherlands, Switzerland and the UK. Through establishing an RiH framework, the programme will identify processes with outcomes that aim to capture how high-quality healthcare provisions are achieved. A collaborative learning framework centred on engagement aims to systematically translate research findings into practice through co-construction processes with partners and stakeholders.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The RiH research programme is approved by the Norwegian Centre for Research Data (No. 864334). The empirical projects selected for inclusion in this longitudinal research programme have been approved by the Norwegian Centre for Research Data or the Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics. The RiH research programme has an embedded publication and dissemination strategy focusing on the progressive sharing of scientific knowledge, information and results, and on engaging with the public, including relevant patient and stakeholder representatives. The findings will be disseminated through scientific articles, PhD dissertations, presentations at national and international conferences, and through social media, newsletters and the popular media.

摘要

简介

在过去的三十年中,人们进行了广泛的研究,以了解构成高质量医疗保健的要素。然而,其中的大部分研究都是针对单个要素及其特定挑战进行的。因此,除了了解构成医疗保健质量的复杂因素和要素之外,其他目标都被赋予了特权。由于缺乏进展,人们得出的结论是,现有的研究方法无法解决医疗保健系统固有的复杂性,因为医疗保健系统在系统内部和系统之间存在着显著的绩效差异,并且使它们具有弹性。因此,这种方法需要转变。医疗保健弹性(RiH)采用一种包含全面研究计划的方法,该计划对医疗保健系统和利益相关者适应变化、变化和/或干扰的能力进行建模:即弹性。因此,RiH 提供了一种新的方法,能够捕捉和阐明医疗保健的复杂性,以及如何理解和推进高质量的医疗保健。

方法和分析

为了阐明医疗保健中的质量构成,有必要超越单一地点、基于案例的研究。相反,需要进行多地点、跨国研究,并在国家和国际研究人员与多个医疗保健利益相关者之间进行长期的多学科合作。通过采用这种过程、多个合作伙伴和多学科方向,为期 5 年的 RiH 研究计划旨在应对这些挑战,并加速当前对医疗保健质量的研究和方法的理解。RiH 研究计划采用纵向协作互动设计,以在挪威和其他五个国家的不同医疗保健环境中捕捉和阐明弹性作为医疗保健质量的一部分。它结合了对挪威详细实证研究的荟萃分析和来自澳大利亚、日本、荷兰、瑞士和英国的跨国比较。通过建立一个 RiH 框架,该计划将确定旨在捕捉如何实现高质量医疗保健服务的结果的过程。以参与为中心的协作学习框架旨在通过与合作伙伴和利益相关者共同构建的过程,将研究结果系统地转化为实践。

伦理和传播

RiH 研究计划已获得挪威研究数据中心的批准(编号为 864334)。选择纳入这项纵向研究计划的实证项目已经得到了挪威研究数据中心或区域医学和健康研究伦理委员会的批准。RiH 研究计划有一个嵌入式的出版和传播策略,重点是逐步分享科学知识、信息和成果,并与公众、包括相关的患者和利益相关者代表进行接触。研究结果将通过科学文章、博士论文、在国内外会议上的演讲以及通过社交媒体、时事通讯和大众媒体进行传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ed/7592282/daad8a6b7017/bmjopen-2020-038779f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ed/7592282/daad8a6b7017/bmjopen-2020-038779f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ed/7592282/daad8a6b7017/bmjopen-2020-038779f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Resilience in Healthcare (RiH): a longitudinal research programme protocol.医疗韧性(RiH):一项纵向研究计划方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 26;10(10):e038779. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038779.
2
Patient and stakeholder involvement in resilient healthcare: an interactive research study protocol.患者和利益相关者参与弹性医疗保健:一项互动研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 3;11(6):e049116. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049116.
3
Multilevel influences on resilient healthcare in six countries: an international comparative study protocol.多层次影响下六个国家的弹性医疗保健:一项国际比较研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 4;10(12):e039158. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039158.
4
Defining the boundaries and operational concepts of resilience in the resilience in healthcare research program.定义医疗保健研究计划中弹性的边界和操作概念。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 19;20(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05224-3.
5
Developing a collaborative learning framework for resilience in healthcare: a study protocol.开发医疗保健中弹性的协作学习框架:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 9;11(8):e045183. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045183.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
9
Government Actions and Their Relation to Resilience in Healthcare During the COVID-19 Pandemic in New South Wales, Australia and Ontario, Canada.政府行动及其与澳大利亚新南威尔士州和加拿大安大略省 COVID-19 大流行期间医疗保健韧性的关系。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Sep 1;11(9):1682-1694. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.67. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Twenty-One Years and Still Going Strong: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Contribution of Young Adult, Adolescent, and Stakeholder Involvement to the Resilience of a Type 1 Diabetes Transition Program.二十一年来始终蓬勃发展:一项定性研究,探索青年、青少年及利益相关者的参与对1型糖尿病过渡项目恢复力的贡献。
Health Expect. 2025 Oct;28(5):e70419. doi: 10.1111/hex.70419.
2
A Resilience Framework for Research in Oncology Massage Therapy.肿瘤按摩疗法研究的复原力框架。
Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2025 Jun 12;18(2):52-59. doi: 10.3822/ijtmb.v18i2.951. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Development of a Web-Based Intervention for Middle Managers to Enhance Resilience at the Individual, Team, and Organizational Levels in Health Care Systems: Multiphase Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Multilevel influences on resilient healthcare in six countries: an international comparative study protocol.多层次影响下六个国家的弹性医疗保健:一项国际比较研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 4;10(12):e039158. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039158.
2
Defining the boundaries and operational concepts of resilience in the resilience in healthcare research program.定义医疗保健研究计划中弹性的边界和操作概念。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 19;20(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05224-3.
3
Resilient Health Care: a systematic review of conceptualisations, study methods and factors that develop resilience.
开发基于网络的干预措施以增强医疗保健系统中中层管理人员在个人、团队和组织层面的复原力:多阶段研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Feb 5;12:e67263. doi: 10.2196/67263.
4
Unfolding insights about resilience and its coping strategies by medical academics and healthcare professionals at their workplaces: a thematic qualitative analysis.医学学者和医疗保健专业人员在工作场所对复原力及其应对策略的新见解:一项主题定性分析
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 4;25(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06415-w.
5
Resilience in nursing medication administration practice: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.护理给药实践中的弹性:系统评价与叙述性综合。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Oct 28;13(4):e002711. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002711.
6
Conceptual Considerations for Understanding Resilience in Healthcare Students.理解医疗学生适应力的概念性思考。
Nurs Open. 2024 Oct;11(10):e70061. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70061.
7
Psychoeducational Burnout Intervention for Nurses: Protocol for a Systematic Review.护士心理教育性耗竭干预:系统评价方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Sep 30;13:e58692. doi: 10.2196/58692.
8
Exploring homecare leaders' risk perception and the link to resilience and adaptive capacity: a multiple case study.探索家庭护理领导者的风险感知及其与弹性和适应能力的联系:一项多案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 14;24(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10808-4.
9
Identifying, categorising, and mapping actors involved in resilience in healthcare: a qualitative stakeholder analysis.确定、分类并绘制医疗卫生系统韧性建设中相关行为体图谱:定性利益攸关方分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 22;24(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10654-4.
10
A resilience view on health system resilience: a scoping review of empirical studies and reviews.韧性视角下的卫生系统韧性:实证研究和综述的范围界定综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 24;23(1):1297. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10022-8.
弹性医疗保健:对概念化、研究方法和发展弹性因素的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 17;20(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05208-3.
4
Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis.医疗保健环境中可预防的患者伤害的发生率、严重程度和性质:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Jul 17;366:l4185. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4185.
5
Resilience From a Stakeholder Perspective: The Role of Next of Kin in Cancer Care.从利益相关者的角度看韧性:癌症护理中近亲的作用。
J Patient Saf. 2020 Sep;16(3):e205-e210. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000532.
6
Scaffolding our systems? Patients and families 'reaching in' as a source of healthcare resilience.支撑我们的系统?患者和家庭“主动参与”作为医疗恢复力的一个来源。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Jan;28(1):3-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008216. Epub 2018 May 15.
7
Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Medication Errors Resulting in Hospitalization and Death of Nursing Home Residents.导致疗养院居民住院和死亡的用药错误发生率的系统评价。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Feb;65(2):433-442. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14683. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
8
Rethinking Autonomy: Relationships as a Source of Resilience in a Changing Healthcare System.重新思考自主性:在不断变化的医疗体系中,人际关系作为恢复力的来源
Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct;51(5):1701-5. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12578.
9
The Irish National Adverse Events Study (INAES): the frequency and nature of adverse events in Irish hospitals-a retrospective record review study.爱尔兰国家不良事件研究(INAES):爱尔兰医院不良事件的发生频率及性质——一项回顾性记录审查研究
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Feb;26(2):111-119. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004828. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
10
Resilient health care: turning patient safety on its head.韧性医疗保健:彻底转变患者安全理念。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Oct;27(5):418-20. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv063. Epub 2015 Aug 20.