SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway.
Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 19;20(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05224-3.
Understanding the resilience of healthcare is critically important. A resilient healthcare system might be expected to consistently deliver high quality care, withstand disruptive events and continually adapt, learn and improve. However, there are many different theories, models and definitions of resilience and most are contested and debated in the literature. Clear and unambiguous conceptual definitions are important for both theoretical and practical considerations of any phenomenon, and resilience is no exception. A large international research programme on Resilience in Healthcare (RiH) is seeking to address these issues in a 5-year study across Norway, England, the Netherlands, Australia, Japan, and Switzerland (2018-2023). The aims of this debate paper are: 1) to identify and select core operational concepts of resilience from the literature in order to consider their contributions, implications, and boundaries for researching resilience in healthcare; and 2) to propose a working definition of healthcare resilience that underpins the international RiH research programme.
To fulfil these aims, first an overview of three core perspectives or metaphors that underpin theories of resilience are introduced from ecology, engineering and psychology. Second, we present a brief overview of key definitions and approaches to resilience applicable in healthcare. We position our research program with collaborative learning and user involvement as vital prerequisite pillars in our conceptualisation and operationalisation of resilience for maintaining quality of healthcare services. Third, our analysis addresses four core questions that studies of resilience in healthcare need to consider when defining and operationalising resilience. These are: resilience 'for what', 'to what', 'of what', and 'through what'? Finally, we present our operational definition of resilience.
The RiH research program is exploring resilience as a multi-level phenomenon and considers adaptive capacity to change as a foundation for high quality care. We, therefore, define healthcare resilience as: the capacity to adapt to challenges and changes at different system levels, to maintain high quality care. This working definition of resilience is intended to be comprehensible and applicable regardless of the level of analysis or type of system component under investigation.
了解医疗保健的弹性至关重要。一个有弹性的医疗保健系统可能能够持续提供高质量的护理,经受住破坏性事件,并不断适应、学习和改进。然而,有许多不同的弹性理论、模型和定义,大多数在文献中都存在争议和争论。对于任何现象的理论和实际考虑,清晰明确的概念定义都很重要,弹性也不例外。一个关于医疗保健弹性(RiH)的大型国际研究计划正在寻求通过一项为期 5 年的挪威、英国、荷兰、澳大利亚、日本和瑞士(2018-2023 年)的研究来解决这些问题。本文的主要目的是:1)从文献中确定和选择弹性的核心操作概念,以考虑它们对研究医疗保健弹性的贡献、影响和界限;2)提出一个支撑国际 RiH 研究计划的医疗保健弹性工作定义。
为了实现这些目标,首先从生态学、工程学和心理学介绍了三个支撑弹性理论的核心观点或隐喻。其次,我们简要介绍了适用于医疗保健的关键弹性定义和方法。我们将协作学习和用户参与作为我们对弹性的概念化和操作化的重要前提支柱,以维持医疗保健服务的质量。第三,我们的分析解决了医疗保健弹性研究在定义和操作弹性时需要考虑的四个核心问题。这些问题是:弹性“针对什么”、“针对什么”、“由什么构成”和“通过什么”?最后,我们提出了我们的弹性操作定义。
RiH 研究计划正在探索弹性作为一个多层次的现象,并认为适应变化的能力是高质量护理的基础。因此,我们将医疗保健弹性定义为:在不同系统层面适应挑战和变化、维持高质量护理的能力。这个弹性的工作定义旨在无论分析的水平或调查的系统组件的类型如何,都具有可理解性和适用性。