Suppr超能文献

高剂量质子泵抑制剂-阿莫西林双重疗法治疗感染:一项荟萃分析的系统评价

High dose PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy for the treatment of infection: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhu Yang-Jie, Zhang Yi, Wang Ting-Yi, Zhao Jing-Tao, Zhao Zhe, Zhu Jian-Ru, Lan Chun-Hui

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, 10 Changjiang Branch Road, Chongqing 400042, China.

出版信息

Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul 31;13:1756284820937115. doi: 10.1177/1756284820937115. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

resistance to amoxicillin remains rare in many regions. Proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-containing high dose dual therapy (HDDT) has been proposed to treat infection. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of PPI-amoxicillin HDDT for treatment of infection in comparison with other regimens.

METHODS

Databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, were searched to find relevant publications. Randomized controlled trials comparing HDDT with control regimens for eradication in adult patients were included. The primary outcome was eradication rate by intention-to-treat analysis. Adverse events were analyzed as second outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 15 trials with 3818 patients qualified for inclusion. The eradication rate of HDDT was neither significantly inferior nor superior to the recommended regimens such as triple therapy, bismuth quadruple therapy, and non-bismuth quadruple therapy [relative risk (RR): 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96-1.05,  = 0.870]. This finding was robust through subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses. Trial sequential analysis showed that HDDT was equivalent to control regimens, and further similar trials were unlikely to alter the conclusions of this analysis. The frequency of adverse events was significantly lower in HDDT group (RR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.37-0.64,  < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

HDDT was equivalent to recommended first-line or rescue regimens with fewer adverse effects. The evidence from this meta-analysis supports the use of HDDT as first-line or rescue treatment for infection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42019133002.

摘要

背景

在许多地区,对阿莫西林耐药的情况仍然很少见。含质子泵抑制剂 - 阿莫西林的高剂量双联疗法(HDDT)已被提议用于治疗感染。我们旨在评估质子泵抑制剂 - 阿莫西林高剂量双联疗法(PPI - 阿莫西林HDDT)与其他方案相比治疗感染的有效性和安全性。

方法

检索包括PubMed、Embase和Cochrane对照试验注册库在内的数据库,以查找相关出版物。纳入了比较HDDT与对照方案用于成年患者根除感染的随机对照试验。主要结局是意向性分析的根除率。将不良事件作为次要结局进行分析。

结果

共有15项试验、3818例患者符合纳入标准。HDDT的根除率既不显著低于也不显著高于推荐方案,如三联疗法、铋剂四联疗法和非铋剂四联疗法[相对危险度(RR):1.00,95%置信区间(CI):0.96 - 1.05,P = 0.870]。通过亚组分析和敏感性分析,这一发现是可靠的。试验序贯分析表明,HDDT与对照方案等效,进一步的类似试验不太可能改变该分析的结论。HDDT组不良事件的发生率显著更低(RR:0.48,95% CI:0.37 - 0.64,P < 0.001)。

结论

HDDT与推荐的一线或挽救方案等效,但不良反应更少。这项荟萃分析的证据支持将HDDT用作感染的一线或挽救治疗。

试验注册

PROSPERO CRD42019133002。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16eb/7559363/b933bc2d7d07/10.1177_1756284820937115-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验