Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
J Sleep Res. 2021 Feb;30(1):e13222. doi: 10.1111/jsr.13222. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
The primary aim was to validate questionnaire-based insomnia diagnoses from a modified Karolinska Sleep Questionnaire (KSQ) and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), by age category (< or >65 years), against a semi-structured face-to-face interview. Secondary aims were to split validity by diagnostic certainty of the interview and to compare prevalence estimates of questionnaire- and interview-based diagnoses. A total of 232 out of 1,200 invited (19.3%) from the fourth Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT4) completed questionnaires, including the KSQ and ISI, shortly before attending a face-to-face diagnostic interview for insomnia based on the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Both a tentative (DSM-5 criteria A-E) and a definite (criteria A-H) interview diagnosis was evaluated. Cohen's kappa statistic quantified questionnaire validity. In all, 33% (95% confidence interval 27-39%) of participants had definite insomnia: 40% of women and 21% of men. The ISI (cut-off 12) and several KSQ-based diagnoses showed very good validity (κ ≤0.74) against the tentative, versus good validity (κ ≤0.61) against the definite interview diagnosis. Short questionnaires, requiring a daytime symptom at least three times a week, may underestimate insomnia prevalence. Validity was consistently higher for persons aged below versus above 65 years (definite insomnia: κ ≤0.64 vs. κ ≤0.56). Our results have implications for epidemiological population-based studies utilising insomnia questionnaires.
本研究旨在通过半结构化面对面访谈,针对年龄类别(<或>65 岁),对基于改良 Karolinska 睡眠问卷 (KSQ) 和失眠严重程度指数 (ISI) 的问卷失眠诊断进行验证,并将验证结果按访谈诊断的确定性进行细分,同时比较基于问卷和访谈的诊断的患病率估计。在第四届北特伦德拉格健康研究 (HUNT4) 中,共邀请了 1200 人参加,其中 232 人(19.3%)在参加基于精神障碍诊断与统计手册第五版 (DSM-5) 的面对面失眠诊断访谈之前,完成了包括 KSQ 和 ISI 在内的问卷。访谈诊断采用了暂定(DSM-5 标准 A-E)和确定(标准 A-H)两种标准。柯氏 κ 统计量用于评估问卷的有效性。所有参与者中,有 33%(95%置信区间 27-39%)患有明确的失眠症:女性占 40%,男性占 21%。ISI(截断值为 12)和几个基于 KSQ 的诊断对暂定诊断具有很好的有效性(κ ≤0.74),而对确定诊断的有效性为良好(κ ≤0.61)。要求每周至少有三天出现日间症状的简短问卷可能会低估失眠症的患病率。对于年龄<65 岁和≥65 岁的人群,有效性始终更高(明确的失眠症:κ ≤0.64 vs. κ ≤0.56)。我们的研究结果对利用失眠问卷进行流行病学人群研究具有重要意义。