Suppr超能文献

巴西可重复性倡议进行两年之际:对开展巴西生物医学科学大规模复制研究的反思。

Two years into the Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative: reflections on conducting a large-scale replication of Brazilian biomedical science.

机构信息

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Bioquímica Médica Leopoldo de Meis, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

出版信息

Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2020 Oct 23;115:e200328. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760200328. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Scientists have increasingly recognised that low methodological and analytical rigour combined with publish-or-perish incentives can make the published scientific literature unreliable. As a response to this, large-scale systematic replications of the literature have emerged as a way to assess the problem empirically. The Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative is one such effort, aimed at estimating the reproducibility of Brazilian biomedical research. Its goal is to perform multicentre replications of a quasi-random sample of at least 60 experiments from Brazilian articles published over a 20-year period, using a set of common laboratory methods. In this article, we describe the challenges of managing a multicentre project with collaborating teams across the country, as well as its successes and failures over the first two years. We end with a brief discussion of the Initiative's current status and its possible future contributions after the project is concluded in 2021.

摘要

科学家们越来越认识到,低方法学和分析严谨性加上发表或灭亡的激励机制可能会使已发表的科学文献变得不可靠。为了应对这一问题,大规模的系统文献复制已经出现,成为一种从经验上评估该问题的方法。巴西可重复性倡议就是这样一种努力,旨在估计巴西生物医学研究的可重复性。其目标是使用一组常见的实验室方法,对过去 20 年发表的巴西文章中至少 60 个实验的准随机样本进行多中心复制。在本文中,我们描述了管理一个多中心项目的挑战,该项目涉及全国范围内的合作团队,以及在头两年的成功和失败。最后,我们简要讨论了该倡议在 2021 年项目结束后的当前状况及其可能的未来贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f45/7586442/5f797e7e95e5/1678-8060-mioc-115-e200328-gf.jpg

相似文献

1
Two years into the Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative: reflections on conducting a large-scale replication of Brazilian biomedical science.
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2020 Oct 23;115:e200328. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760200328. eCollection 2020.
2
The Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative.
Elife. 2019 Feb 5;8:e41602. doi: 10.7554/eLife.41602.
3
An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research.
Elife. 2014 Dec 10;3:e04333. doi: 10.7554/eLife.04333.
5
[Citation patterns in Portuguese and Brazilian biomedical journals].
Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc. 2012 Jul-Sep;19(3):119-25.
7
The scientific production of Brazilian neurologists: 1995-2004.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2006 Jun;64(2B):538-42. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2006000300037.
8
Enhancing reproducibility: Failures from Reproducibility Initiatives underline core challenges.
Biochem Pharmacol. 2017 Aug 15;138:7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
9
Replicator degrees of freedom allow publication of misleading failures to replicate.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 17;116(51):25535-25545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1910951116. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
10
The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.
Oncologist. 2015 May;20(5):464-e20. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0431. Epub 2015 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating the replicability of highly cited clinical research (2004-2018).
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 7;19(8):e0307145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307145. eCollection 2024.
2
Research on scalable graphene faces a reproducibility gap.
Nat Commun. 2023 Feb 28;14(1):1126. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36891-5.
3
Combining Animal Welfare With Experimental Rigor to Improve Reproducibility in Behavioral Neuroscience.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Nov 30;15:763428. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.763428. eCollection 2021.
4
Improving preclinical studies through replications.
Elife. 2021 Jan 12;10:e62101. doi: 10.7554/eLife.62101.

本文引用的文献

2
Research Culture and Reproducibility.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Feb;24(2):91-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.002. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
3
The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology through a Distributed Collaborative Network.
Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci. 2018 Dec;1(4):501-515. doi: 10.1177/2515245918797607. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
4
A journal club to fix science.
Nature. 2019 Sep;573(7775):465. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8.
5
Signaling the trustworthiness of science.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Sep 24;116(39):19231-19236. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1913039116. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
6
Financial crisis looms at Brazilian science agency.
Science. 2019 Aug 23;365(6455):731. doi: 10.1126/science.365.6455.731.
7
Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015.
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Sep;2(9):637-644. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
8
The Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative.
Elife. 2019 Feb 5;8:e41602. doi: 10.7554/eLife.41602.
10
Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Jul;13(4):411-417. doi: 10.1177/1745691617751884.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验