• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究文化与可重复性。

Research Culture and Reproducibility.

机构信息

Medical Research Council (MRC) Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Feb;24(2):91-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.002. Epub 2019 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.002
PMID:31892459
Abstract

There is ongoing debate regarding the robustness and credibility of published scientific research. We argue that these issues stem from two broad causal mechanisms: the cognitive biases of researchers and the incentive structures within which researchers operate. The UK Reproducibility Network (UKRN) is working with researchers, institutions, funders, publishers, and other stakeholders to address these issues.

摘要

关于已发表的科学研究的稳健性和可信度,一直存在争议。我们认为,这些问题源于两个广泛的因果机制:研究人员的认知偏差和研究人员运作的激励结构。英国可重复性网络(UKRN)正在与研究人员、机构、资助者、出版商和其他利益相关者合作,以解决这些问题。

相似文献

1
Research Culture and Reproducibility.研究文化与可重复性。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Feb;24(2):91-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.002. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
2
The reproducibility debate is an opportunity, not a crisis.重复性争议是一个机会,而不是一场危机。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Feb 10;15(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-05942-3.
3
From grassroots to global: A blueprint for building a reproducibility network.从基层到全球:构建可重复性网络的蓝图。
PLoS Biol. 2021 Nov 10;19(11):e3001461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001461. eCollection 2021 Nov.
4
Reforms to improve reproducibility and quality must be coordinated across the research ecosystem: the view from the UKRN Local Network Leads.为了提高可重复性和质量,必须协调整个研究生态系统的改革:来自 UKRN 地方网络负责人的观点。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Feb 15;15(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-05949-w.
5
A network of change: united action on research integrity.变革网络:关于研究诚信的联合行动。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Apr 14;15(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06026-y.
6
Improving the reproducibility and integrity of research: what can different stakeholders contribute?提高研究的可重复性和完整性:不同利益相关者能做出什么贡献?
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Apr 25;15(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06030-2.
7
The hidden side of animal cognition research: Scientists' attitudes toward bias, replicability and scientific practice.动物认知研究的另一面:科学家对偏见、可重复性和科学实践的态度。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 31;16(8):e0256607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256607. eCollection 2021.
8
Improving medical research in the United Kingdom.提高英国的医学研究水平。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 May 13;15(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06050-y.
9
Improving research quality: the view from the UK Reproducibility Network institutional leads for research improvement.提高研究质量:来自英国可重复性网络研究改进机构负责人的观点。
BMC Res Notes. 2021 Dec 20;14(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05883-3.
10
Reporting health services research to a broader public: An exploration of inconsistencies and reporting inadequacies in societal publications.向更广泛的公众报告卫生服务研究:对社会出版物中不一致和报告不足的探索。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 7;16(4):e0248753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248753. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Successful reproduction of a large EEG study across software packages.一项大型脑电图研究在不同软件包上的成功复现。
Neuroimage Rep. 2023 May 27;3(2):100169. doi: 10.1016/j.ynirp.2023.100169. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Decisions, Decisions, Decisions: An Ethnographic Study of Researcher Discretion in Practice.决策,决策,决策:实践中研究人员裁量权的民族志研究。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Nov 29;30(6):59. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00481-5.
3
A grassroots approach to peer support by the Danish Reproducibility Network.丹麦可重复性网络的基层同行支持方法。
BMC Res Notes. 2024 Sep 10;17(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-06912-7.
4
UK Reproducibility Network open and transparent research practices survey dataset.英国可重复性网络开放透明研究实践调查数据集
Sci Data. 2024 Aug 23;11(1):912. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03786-z.
5
A scoping review on what constitutes a good research culture.关于何为良好研究文化的范围综述。
F1000Res. 2024 Oct 14;13:324. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.147599.1. eCollection 2024.
6
Research culture in biomedicine: what we learned, and what we would like to do about it.生物医学研究文化:我们的所得与所想。
Commun Biol. 2024 May 7;7(1):546. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06237-y.
7
The Application of Evidence-Based Medicine in Individualized Medicine.循证医学在个体化医疗中的应用。
Biomedicines. 2023 Jun 23;11(7):1793. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11071793.
8
Reproducibility and Scientific Integrity of Big Data Research in Urban Public Health and Digital Epidemiology: A Call to Action.大数据研究在城市公共卫生和数字流行病学中的可重复性和科学诚信:行动呼吁。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 13;20(2):1473. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021473.
9
Recommendations for robust and reproducible preclinical research in personalised medicine.个性化医学中稳健且可重复的临床前研究建议。
BMC Med. 2023 Jan 8;21(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02719-0.
10
Self-correction in science: The effect of retraction on the frequency of citations.科学中的自我纠错:撤回对引用频率的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 7;17(12):e0277814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277814. eCollection 2022.