Suppr超能文献

人乳头瘤病毒感染与恶性鼻腔鼻窦内翻性乳头状瘤的关系。

Association Between Human Papilloma Virus Infection and Malignant Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Taizhou Second People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Taizhou, China.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nanjing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2021 Jun;131(6):1200-1205. doi: 10.1002/lary.29125. Epub 2020 Oct 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the risk of malignant sinonasal inverted papilloma (SNIP) according to the type of human papilloma virus (HPV) infection.

METHODS

The databases of PubMed, EmBase, and Web of Science were searched for studies that reported the risk of malignant SNIP in patients infected by specific types of HPV. The quantitative analyses for pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty-six molecular epidemiological studies that recruited a total of 900 patients with SNIP were selected for the final meta-analysis. The summary ORs indicated that HPV-6 (OR: 2.02; 95% CI: 0.47-8.61; P = .343), HPV-11 (OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.26-2.89; P = .806), and HPV-6/11 (OR: 1.44; 95% CI: 0.59-3.53; P = .426) infections were not associated with the risk of malignant SNIP. However, the risk of malignant SNIP was increased in patients infected with HPV-16 (OR: 8.51; 95% CI: 3.36-21.59; P < .001), HPV-11/16 (OR: 7.95; 95% CI: 1.13-56.01; P = .038), HPV-18 (OR: 23.26; 95% CI: 5.27-102.73; P < .001), and HPV-16/18 (OR: 24.34; 95% CI: 5.74-103.18; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that patients infected with HPV types 16, 11/16, 18, and 16/18 were associated with an increased risk of malignant SNIP. However, patients infected with HPV types 6, 11, and 6/11 did not have a significant risk of malignant SNIP. Laryngoscope, 131:1200-1205, 2021.

摘要

目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估根据人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染类型,恶性鼻窦内翻性乳头状瘤(SNIP)的风险。

方法

检索 PubMed、EmBase 和 Web of Science 数据库,以确定报道特定类型 HPV 感染患者发生恶性 SNIP 风险的研究。计算汇总优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)的定量分析。

结果

最终荟萃分析共纳入了 26 项共招募了 900 名 SNIP 患者的分子流行病学研究。汇总 OR 表明 HPV-6(OR:2.02;95%CI:0.47-8.61;P=.343)、HPV-11(OR:0.86;95%CI:0.26-2.89;P=.806)和 HPV-6/11(OR:1.44;95%CI:0.59-3.53;P=.426)感染与恶性 SNIP 风险无关。然而,HPV-16(OR:8.51;95%CI:3.36-21.59;P < .001)、HPV-11/16(OR:7.95;95%CI:1.13-56.01;P =.038)、HPV-18(OR:23.26;95%CI:5.27-102.73;P < .001)和 HPV-16/18(OR:24.34;95%CI:5.74-103.18;P < .001)感染患者发生恶性 SNIP 的风险增加。

结论

本研究发现,HPV 型 16、11/16、18 和 16/18 感染患者与恶性 SNIP 风险增加相关。然而,HPV 型 6、11 和 6/11 感染患者恶性 SNIP 风险无显著增加。《喉镜》,131:1200-1205,2021。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验