Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton L8N 3Z5, Ontario, Canada.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020 Nov;70(11):5753-5798. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004475. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
To clarify the evolutionary relationships and classification of species, comprehensive phylogenomic and comparative analyses were performed on >300 genomes. Multiple genomic-scale phylogenetic trees were initially reconstructed to identify different monophyletic clades of species. In parallel, detailed analyses were performed on protein sequences of genomes to identify conserved signature indels (CSIs) that are specific for each of the identified clades. We show that in different reconstructed trees, most of the species, in addition to the Subtilis and Cereus clades, consistently formed 17 novel distinct clades. Additionally, some species reliably grouped with the genera and . The distinctness of identified species clades is independently strongly supported by 128 identified CSIs which are unique characteristics of these clades, providing reliable means for their demarcation. Based on the strong phylogenetic and molecular evidence, we are proposing that these 17 species clades should be recognized as novel genera, with the names gen. nov. gen. nov., gen. nov. gen. nov. gen. nov. gen. nov. gen. nov. gen. nov. gen. nov. gen. nov. gen. nov. gen. nov. gen. nov. gen. nov. gen. nov., gen. nov. and gen. nov. We also propose to transfer 's' to sp. nov. (type strain: NB22=JCM 17569=DSM 26768). Additionally, we report 31 CSIs that are unique characteristics of either the members of the Subtilis clade (containing the type species ) or the Cereus clade (containing and ). As most species which are not part of these two clades can now be assigned to other genera, we are proposing an emended description of the genus to restrict it to only the members of the Subtilis and Cereus clades.
为了阐明物种的进化关系和分类,我们对超过 300 个基因组进行了全面的系统基因组学和比较分析。最初构建了多个基因组规模的系统发育树,以确定 物种的不同单系群。同时,我们还对基因组的蛋白质序列进行了详细分析,以确定每个鉴定的群都具有特异性的保守特征缺失(CSIs)。我们表明,在不同的重建树中,除了枯草芽孢杆菌和蜡样芽孢杆菌群之外,大多数 物种还一致形成了 17 个新的独特群。此外,一些 物种与 属和 属可靠地聚在一起。通过 128 个鉴定的 CSI 强烈支持所鉴定的 物种群的独特性,这些 CSI 是这些群的独特特征,为它们的划分提供了可靠的手段。基于强有力的系统发育和分子证据,我们建议将这 17 个 物种群确认为新的属,其名称分别为 属,nov. 属,nov. 属,nov. 属,nov. 属,nov. 属,nov. 属,nov. 属,nov. 属,nov. 属,nov. 属,nov. 属,nov. 属和 属。我们还建议将“s”转移到 种,nov.(模式株:NB22=JCM 17569=DSM 26768)。此外,我们还报告了 31 个 CSI,它们是枯草芽孢杆菌群(包含模式种 )或蜡样芽孢杆菌群(包含 和 )成员的独特特征。由于不属于这两个群的大多数 物种现在可以被分配到其他属,我们建议对 属的描述进行修正,将其限制在枯草芽孢杆菌群和蜡样芽孢杆菌群的成员中。