• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家以下层面的 COVID-19 推文的纵向和地理空间分析。

Sub-national longitudinal and geospatial analysis of COVID-19 tweets.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, San Diego School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California, United States of America.

Global Health Policy Institute, San Diego, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 28;15(10):e0241330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241330. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0241330
PMID:33112922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7592735/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

According to current reporting, the number of active coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections is not evenly distributed, both spatially and temporally. Reported COVID-19 infections may not have properly conveyed the full extent of attention to the pandemic. Furthermore, infection metrics are unlikely to illustrate the full scope of negative consequences of the pandemic and its associated risk to communities.

METHODS

In an effort to better understand the impacts of COVID-19, we concurrently assessed the geospatial and longitudinal distributions of Twitter messages about COVID-19 which were posted between March 3rd and April 13th and compared these results with the number of confirmed cases reported for sub-national levels of the United States. Geospatial hot spot analysis was also conducted to detect geographic areas that might be at elevated risk of spread based on both volume of tweets and number of reported cases.

RESULTS

Statistically significant aberrations of high numbers of tweets were detected in approximately one-third of US states, most of which had relatively high proportions of rural inhabitants. Geospatial trends toward becoming hotspots for tweets related to COVID-19 were observed for specific rural states in the United States.

DISCUSSION

Population-adjusted results indicate that rural areas in the U.S. may not have engaged with the COVID-19 topic until later stages of an outbreak. Future studies should explore how this dynamic can inform future outbreak communication and health promotion.

摘要

目的

根据目前的报告,2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)活跃感染的数量在空间和时间上分布不均。报告的 COVID-19 感染可能没有恰当地传达出对大流行的充分关注。此外,感染指标不太可能说明大流行及其对社区相关风险的全部负面影响的范围。

方法

为了更好地了解 COVID-19 的影响,我们同时评估了 3 月 3 日至 4 月 13 日期间发布的有关 COVID-19 的 Twitter 消息的地理空间和纵向分布,并将这些结果与美国次国家级别的确诊病例数进行了比较。还进行了地理空间热点分析,以根据推文数量和报告病例数检测出可能处于传播高风险的地理区域。

结果

在美国大约三分之一的州中,检测到与 COVID-19 相关的大量推文出现了统计学上显著的异常,其中大多数州的农村居民比例相对较高。与 COVID-19 相关的推文在特定农村州中呈现出成为热点的地理趋势。

讨论

人口调整后的结果表明,美国农村地区可能直到疫情爆发的后期才开始关注 COVID-19 话题。未来的研究应探讨这种动态如何为未来的疫情传播和健康促进提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39d1/7592735/55a8008122d0/pone.0241330.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39d1/7592735/9f8f73cf76c4/pone.0241330.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39d1/7592735/55a8008122d0/pone.0241330.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39d1/7592735/9f8f73cf76c4/pone.0241330.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39d1/7592735/55a8008122d0/pone.0241330.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Sub-national longitudinal and geospatial analysis of COVID-19 tweets.国家以下层面的 COVID-19 推文的纵向和地理空间分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 28;15(10):e0241330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241330. eCollection 2020.
2
Topics, Trends, and Sentiments of Tweets About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Temporal Infoveillance Study.关于新冠疫情的推文主题、趋势和情绪:时间信息监测研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 23;22(10):e22624. doi: 10.2196/22624.
3
Creating COVID-19 Stigma by Referencing the Novel Coronavirus as the "Chinese virus" on Twitter: Quantitative Analysis of Social Media Data.在推特上将新型冠状病毒称为“中国病毒”从而制造新冠病毒污名化:社交媒体数据的定量分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 6;22(5):e19301. doi: 10.2196/19301.
4
Conversations and Medical News Frames on Twitter: Infodemiological Study on COVID-19 in South Korea.推特上的对话与医学新闻框架:韩国新冠肺炎信息流行病学研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 5;22(5):e18897. doi: 10.2196/18897.
5
Temporal and Location Variations, and Link Categories for the Dissemination of COVID-19-Related Information on Twitter During the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak in Europe: Infoveillance Study.欧洲SARS-CoV-2疫情期间推特上新冠疫情相关信息传播的时间和地点变化以及链接类别:信息监测研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 28;22(8):e19629. doi: 10.2196/19629.
6
Top Concerns of Tweeters During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infoveillance Study.新冠疫情期间推特用户的主要担忧:信息监测研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 21;22(4):e19016. doi: 10.2196/19016.
7
COVID-19 and the 5G Conspiracy Theory: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data.新冠疫情与5G阴谋论:基于推特数据的社交网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 6;22(5):e19458. doi: 10.2196/19458.
8
Public Perceptions and Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Nonpharmaceutical Interventions Across Six Countries: A Topic Modeling Analysis of Twitter Data.六个国家公众对COVID-19非药物干预措施的认知与态度:基于推特数据的主题建模分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 3;22(9):e21419. doi: 10.2196/21419.
9
Social Network Analysis of COVID-19 Sentiments: Application of Artificial Intelligence.COVID-19 舆情的社会网络分析:人工智能的应用
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 18;22(8):e22590. doi: 10.2196/22590.
10
Geolocated Twitter social media data to describe the geographic spread of SARS-CoV-2.利用地理定位的 Twitter 社交媒体数据来描述 SARS-CoV-2 的地理传播。
J Travel Med. 2020 Aug 20;27(5). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa120.

引用本文的文献

1
Demographic disparities in access to COVID-19 clinical trial sites across the United States: a geospatial analysis.美国各地获得COVID-19临床试验地点的人口统计学差异:一项地理空间分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jan 23;24(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02360-8.
2
Using geospatial social media data for infectious disease studies: a systematic review.利用地理空间社交媒体数据进行传染病研究:一项系统综述。
Int J Digit Earth. 2023;16(1):130-157. doi: 10.1080/17538947.2022.2161652. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
3
Public Figure Vaccination Rhetoric and Vaccine Hesitancy: Retrospective Twitter Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Progression of COVID-19 From Urban to Rural Areas in the United States: A Spatiotemporal Analysis of Prevalence Rates.美国新冠病毒从城市向农村地区的传播:流行率的时空分析。
J Rural Health. 2020 Sep;36(4):591-601. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12486. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
2
Improving epidemic surveillance and response: big data is dead, long live big data.改善疫情监测与应对:大数据已死,大数据万岁。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 May;2(5):e218-e220. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30059-5. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
3
Machine Learning to Detect Self-Reporting of Symptoms, Testing Access, and Recovery Associated With COVID-19 on Twitter: Retrospective Big Data Infoveillance Study.
公众人物的疫苗接种言论与疫苗犹豫:推特回顾性分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2023 Mar 10;3:e40575. doi: 10.2196/40575. eCollection 2023.
4
Analyzing Discussions Around Rural Health on Twitter During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data.分析新冠疫情期间推特上围绕农村卫生的讨论:推特数据的社会网络分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2023 Mar 8;3:e39209. doi: 10.2196/39209. eCollection 2023.
5
The Associations Between Racially/Ethnically Stratified COVID-19 Tweets and COVID-19 Cases and Deaths: Cross-sectional Study.按种族/民族分层的新冠疫情推文与新冠病例及死亡之间的关联:横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 May 30;6(5):e30371. doi: 10.2196/30371.
6
Spatiotemporal sentiment variation analysis of geotagged COVID-19 tweets from India using a hybrid deep learning model.利用混合深度学习模型分析来自印度带有地理标签的 COVID-19 推文的时空情绪变化。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 3;12(1):1849. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05974-6.
7
Temporal Variations and Spatial Disparities in Public Sentiment Toward COVID-19 and Preventive Practices in the United States: Infodemiology Study of Tweets.美国公众对新冠疫情的情绪及预防措施的时间变化与空间差异:推文的信息流行病学研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2021 Dec 30;1(1):e31671. doi: 10.2196/31671. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
8
A longitudinal and geospatial analysis of COVID-19 tweets during the early outbreak period in the United States.美国疫情早期爆发期间新冠疫情推文的纵向和地理空间分析。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 24;21(1):793. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10827-4.
基于机器学习的方法在推特上检测与 COVID-19 相关的自我报告症状、检测途径和康复情况:回顾性大数据信息监测研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Jun 8;6(2):e19509. doi: 10.2196/19509.
4
COVID-19 Emergence and Social and Health Determinants in Colorado: A Rapid Spatial Analysis.科罗拉多州的 COVID-19 疫情爆发与社会和健康决定因素:快速空间分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 29;17(11):3856. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113856.
5
Scientific and ethical basis for social-distancing interventions against COVID-19.针对COVID-19的社交距离干预措施的科学与伦理基础。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;20(6):631-633. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30190-0. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
6
Case-Fatality Rate and Characteristics of Patients Dying in Relation to COVID-19 in Italy.意大利新冠肺炎死亡患者的病死率及特征
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1775-1776. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4683.
7
Clinical characteristics of 24 asymptomatic infections with COVID-19 screened among close contacts in Nanjing, China.中国南京接触者中 24 例新冠肺炎无症状感染的临床特征。
Sci China Life Sci. 2020 May;63(5):706-711. doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1661-4. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
8
Characteristics of COVID-19 infection in Beijing.北京地区 COVID-19 感染特征。
J Infect. 2020 Apr;80(4):401-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.02.018. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
9
An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time.一个基于网络的交互式仪表盘,用于实时追踪新冠病毒。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):533-534. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
10
Infodemiology and infoveillance: framework for an emerging set of public health informatics methods to analyze search, communication and publication behavior on the Internet.信息流行病学与信息监测:一套新兴的公共卫生信息学方法的框架,用于分析互联网上的搜索、交流和出版行为。
J Med Internet Res. 2009 Mar 27;11(1):e11. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1157.