• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法国公私产科医疗服务提供者之间的竞争:市场细分的证据。

Competition between Public and Private Maternity Care Providers in France: Evidence on Market Segmentation.

机构信息

PSL Research University, LEDa (CGEMP) UMR CNRS [8007], Université Paris-Dauphine, UMR IRD [260], 75016 Paris, France.

Panthéon-Sorbonne, University of Paris 1, 75231 Paris, France.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 26;17(21):7846. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217846.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17217846
PMID:33114744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7662386/
Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the potential for segmentation in hospital markets, using the French case where private for-profit providers play an important role having nearly 25% of market shares, and where prices are regulated, leading to quality competition. Using a stylized economic model of hospital competition, we investigate the potential for displacement between vertically differentiated public and private providers, focusing on maternity units where user choice is central. Building over the model, we test the following three hypotheses. First, the number of public maternity units is likely to be much larger in less populated departments than in more populated ones. Second, as the number of public maternity units decreases, the profitability constraint should allow more private players into the market. Third, private units are closer substitutes to other private units than to public units. Building an exhaustive and nationwide data set on the activity of maternity services linked to detailed data at a hospital level, we use an event study framework, which exploits two sources of variation: (1) The variation over time in the number of maternity units and (2) the variation in users' choices. We find support for our hypotheses, indicating that segmentation is at work in these markets with asymmetrical effects between public and private sectors that need to be accounted for when deciding on public market entry or exit.

摘要

本文旨在研究医院市场的细分潜力,以法国为例,在法国,私立营利性医疗机构占有近 25%的市场份额,且价格受到监管,导致了质量竞争。我们使用医院竞争的简化经济模型,研究了垂直差异化的公立和私立医疗机构之间潜在的替代关系,重点关注用户选择至关重要的妇产科。在此模型基础上,我们检验了以下三个假设。首先,在人口较少的部门,公立妇产科的数量可能远远大于人口较多的部门。其次,随着公立妇产科数量的减少,利润约束应该允许更多的私立机构进入市场。第三,私立机构与其他私立机构的替代程度比与公立机构的替代程度更高。我们构建了一个详尽的、全国性的妇产科服务活动数据集,并与医院层面的详细数据相关联,使用事件研究框架,利用两个变化来源:(1)妇产科数量随时间的变化,以及(2)用户选择的变化。我们发现支持我们的假设的证据,表明细分在这些市场中发挥了作用,公立和私营部门之间存在不对称的影响,在决定公共市场的进入或退出时需要考虑到这些影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5c1/7662386/40e54675665d/ijerph-17-07846-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5c1/7662386/4b333db76364/ijerph-17-07846-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5c1/7662386/40e54675665d/ijerph-17-07846-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5c1/7662386/4b333db76364/ijerph-17-07846-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5c1/7662386/40e54675665d/ijerph-17-07846-g002a.jpg

相似文献

1
Competition between Public and Private Maternity Care Providers in France: Evidence on Market Segmentation.法国公私产科医疗服务提供者之间的竞争:市场细分的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 26;17(21):7846. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217846.
2
Investigating the nature of competition facing private healthcare facilities: the case of maternity care in Uttar Pradesh, India.调查私立医疗机构面临的竞争性质:以印度北方邦的产妇护理为例。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Jul 1;34(6):450-460. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz056.
3
Technical quality of delivery care in private- and public-sector health facilities in Enugu and Lagos States, Nigeria.尼日利亚埃努古州和拉各斯州私营和公营部门保健设施的分娩护理技术质量。
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Jun 1;33(5):666-674. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy032.
4
[Medical responsibility of midwives in public and private maternity units. Results of a survey of 11 French regions].[公立及私立产科机构中助产士的医疗责任。法国11个地区的调查结果]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1998 Nov;27(7):692-701.
5
The malaria testing and treatment landscape in mainland Tanzania, 2016.2016年坦桑尼亚大陆的疟疾检测与治疗情况
Malar J. 2017 Apr 24;16(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-1819-7.
6
The role of private providers in maternal and child health and family planning services in developing countries.私立医疗服务提供者在发展中国家母婴健康及计划生育服务中的作用。
Health Policy Plan. 1996 Jun;11(2):142-55. doi: 10.1093/heapol/11.2.142.
7
As predicted by theory: choice and competition in a publicly funded and regulated regional health system yield improved access and cost control.正如理论所预测的那样:在一个由公共资金支持且受监管的地区医疗系统中,选择和竞争带来了更好的医疗服务可及性和成本控制。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 1;21(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06392-6.
8
Market competition, ownership, payment systems and the performance of health care providers - a panel study among Finnish occupational health services providers.市场竞争、所有制、支付制度与医疗机构绩效——芬兰职业健康服务提供商的面板研究。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2013 Oct;8(4):477-510. doi: 10.1017/S174413311200031X. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
9
Managing the health care market in developing countries: prospects and problems.发展中国家医疗保健市场的管理:前景与问题
Health Policy Plan. 1994 Sep;9(3):237-51. doi: 10.1093/heapol/9.3.237.
10
Institutional delivery in public and private sectors in South Asia: a comparative analysis of prospective data from four demographic surveillance sites.南亚公共部门和私营部门的机构分娩情况:来自四个人口监测点的前瞻性数据比较分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Sep 20;16:273. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1069-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Free to Choose? Reform, Choice, and Consideration Sets in the English National Health Service.自由选择?英国国民医疗服务体系中的改革、选择与考量集
Am Econ Rev. 2016 Nov;106(11):3521-57. doi: 10.1257/aer.20121532.
2
Does Quality Affect Patients' Choice of Doctor? Evidence from England.医疗质量会影响患者对医生的选择吗?来自英国的证据。
Econ J (London). 2017 Mar;127(600):445-494. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12282. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
3
Competition policy for health care provision in France.法国医疗保健服务的竞争政策。
Health Policy. 2017 Feb;121(2):111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
4
Health Care Exceptionalism? Performance and Allocation in the US Health Care Sector.医疗保健例外论?美国医疗保健部门的绩效与分配
Am Econ Rev. 2016 Aug;106(8):2110-2144. doi: 10.1257/aer.20151080.
5
Does Hospital Competition Save Lives? Evidence from the English NHS Patient Choice Reforms.医院竞争能挽救生命吗?来自英国国民医疗服务体系患者选择改革的证据。
Econ J (London). 2011 Aug;121(554):F228-F260. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02449.x.
6
Do patients want a choice and does it work?患者想要选择权吗?它起作用吗?
BMJ. 2010 Oct 14;341:c4989. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4989.
7
Hospital closure and economic efficiency.医院关闭与经济效益。
J Health Econ. 2010 Jan;29(1):87-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.10.006. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
8
Why do patients bypass the nearest hospital? An empirical analysis for orthopaedic care and neurosurgery in the Netherlands.为什么患者会绕过最近的医院?荷兰骨科护理和神经外科的实证分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2007 Sep;8(3):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s10198-006-0035-0. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
9
Assessing competition in hospital care markets: the importance of accounting for quality differentiation.评估医院护理市场中的竞争:考虑质量差异的重要性。
Rand J Econ. 2003 Winter;34(4):786-814.
10
Market power and hospital pricing: are nonprofits different?市场势力与医院定价:非营利性医院有何不同?
Health Aff (Millwood). 1999 May-Jun;18(3):167-73. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.18.3.167.