PSL Research University, LEDa (CGEMP) UMR CNRS [8007], Université Paris-Dauphine, UMR IRD [260], 75016 Paris, France.
Panthéon-Sorbonne, University of Paris 1, 75231 Paris, France.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 26;17(21):7846. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217846.
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the potential for segmentation in hospital markets, using the French case where private for-profit providers play an important role having nearly 25% of market shares, and where prices are regulated, leading to quality competition. Using a stylized economic model of hospital competition, we investigate the potential for displacement between vertically differentiated public and private providers, focusing on maternity units where user choice is central. Building over the model, we test the following three hypotheses. First, the number of public maternity units is likely to be much larger in less populated departments than in more populated ones. Second, as the number of public maternity units decreases, the profitability constraint should allow more private players into the market. Third, private units are closer substitutes to other private units than to public units. Building an exhaustive and nationwide data set on the activity of maternity services linked to detailed data at a hospital level, we use an event study framework, which exploits two sources of variation: (1) The variation over time in the number of maternity units and (2) the variation in users' choices. We find support for our hypotheses, indicating that segmentation is at work in these markets with asymmetrical effects between public and private sectors that need to be accounted for when deciding on public market entry or exit.
本文旨在研究医院市场的细分潜力,以法国为例,在法国,私立营利性医疗机构占有近 25%的市场份额,且价格受到监管,导致了质量竞争。我们使用医院竞争的简化经济模型,研究了垂直差异化的公立和私立医疗机构之间潜在的替代关系,重点关注用户选择至关重要的妇产科。在此模型基础上,我们检验了以下三个假设。首先,在人口较少的部门,公立妇产科的数量可能远远大于人口较多的部门。其次,随着公立妇产科数量的减少,利润约束应该允许更多的私立机构进入市场。第三,私立机构与其他私立机构的替代程度比与公立机构的替代程度更高。我们构建了一个详尽的、全国性的妇产科服务活动数据集,并与医院层面的详细数据相关联,使用事件研究框架,利用两个变化来源:(1)妇产科数量随时间的变化,以及(2)用户选择的变化。我们发现支持我们的假设的证据,表明细分在这些市场中发挥了作用,公立和私营部门之间存在不对称的影响,在决定公共市场的进入或退出时需要考虑到这些影响。