• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

威斯康星大学跑步损伤与康复指数的结构效度和反应度。

Construct Validity and Responsiveness of the University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index.

出版信息

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Dec;50(12):702-710. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2020.9698. Epub 2020 Oct 28.

DOI:10.2519/jospt.2020.9698
PMID:33115339
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) is the first running-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). The UWRI evaluates the key elements runners use to self-assess running ability during recovery. This study evaluated the construct-related validity and responsiveness of the UWRI as an evaluative PROM of running ability following running-related injury (RRI).

DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal study.

METHODS

Runners seeking care from a physical therapist for an RRI (n = 396) completed PROMs at baseline and 12 weeks later. Change in UWRI score was validated against the global rating of change (GROC), Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) change, and change in body region- specific PROMs. Responsiveness was evaluated using anchor-based and distribution-based techniques.

RESULTS

Change in UWRI score (mean ± SD, 7.7 ± 8.9 points) was correlated with the GROC ( = 0.67), as well as with changes in the VR-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS) ( = 0.54) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) ( = 0.31). Change in UWRI score was correlated with changes in the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure sports subscale ( = 0.75), the 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool ( = 0.75), and the Anterior Knee Pain Scale ( = 0.48), but not with the Oswestry Disability Index Version 2.0 ( = 0.05). Change in UWRI score was significantly different in runners reporting significant improvement (12.2 ± 5.9 points), slight improvement (7.1 ± 6.6 points), no change (0.0 ± 9.1 points), and worsening (-14.6 ± 7.4 points) on the GROC anchor-based responsiveness assessment. The UWRI minimal important change and minimal clinically important difference were 5 and 8 points, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The UWRI is a valid clinical tool for evaluating running ability following RRI; it demonstrated longitudinal validity (GROC), convergent validity (PCS and body region- specific PROMs), divergent validity (MCS), and responsiveness to changes in patient-perceived running ability. .

摘要

目的

威斯康星大学跑步损伤和恢复指数(UWRI)是首个专门针对跑步者的患者报告结局测量(PROM)。UWRI 评估了跑步者在恢复期间自我评估跑步能力时使用的关键要素。本研究评估了 UWRI 作为一种与跑步相关损伤(RRI)后评估跑步能力的评价性 PROM 的结构相关效度和反应度。

设计

前瞻性纵向研究。

方法

因 RRI 而向物理治疗师寻求治疗的跑步者(n = 396)在基线和 12 周后完成了 PROMs。UWRI 评分的变化通过与整体变化评级(GROC)、退伍军人 RAND 12 项健康调查(VR-12)变化以及特定身体区域 PROM 的变化进行验证。反应度通过基于锚定和基于分布的技术进行评估。

结果

UWRI 评分的变化(平均值 ± 标准差,7.7 ± 8.9 分)与 GROC( = 0.67)相关,与 VR-12 生理成分综合评分(PCS)( = 0.54)和心理成分综合评分(MCS)( = 0.31)的变化相关。UWRI 评分的变化与足踝能力测量运动分量表( = 0.75)、12 项国际髋关节结果工具( = 0.75)和前膝痛量表( = 0.48)的变化相关,但与 Oswestry 残疾指数 2.0 版本( = 0.05)无关。在基于 GROC 锚定反应性评估报告有显著改善(12.2 ± 5.9 分)、稍有改善(7.1 ± 6.6 分)、无变化(0.0 ± 9.1 分)和恶化(-14.6 ± 7.4 分)的跑步者中,UWRI 评分的变化有显著差异。UWRI 的最小重要变化和最小临床重要差异分别为 5 分和 8 分。

结论

UWRI 是一种评估 RRI 后跑步能力的有效临床工具;它表现出纵向有效性(GROC)、收敛有效性(PCS 和特定身体区域的 PROMs)、发散有效性(MCS)和对患者感知跑步能力变化的反应度。

相似文献

1
Construct Validity and Responsiveness of the University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index.威斯康星大学跑步损伤与康复指数的结构效度和反应度。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Dec;50(12):702-710. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2020.9698. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
2
Development of the University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index.威斯康星大学跑步损伤与康复指数的发展。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Oct;49(10):751-760. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8868. Epub 2019 Aug 3.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index questionnaire in Spanish (UWRI-S).西班牙语版威斯康星大学跑步损伤与康复指数问卷的跨文化调适及心理计量特性评估(UWRI-S)。
Phys Ther Sport. 2022 May;55:289-295. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.05.007. Epub 2022 May 24.
4
Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index in Turkish Runners.土耳其跑者威斯康星大学跑步损伤与康复指数的跨文化调适。
J Sport Rehabil. 2023 May 9;32(6):703-708. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2022-0241. Print 2023 Aug 1.
5
Cross cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Persian version of the university of Wisconsin running injury and recovery index.威斯康星大学跑步损伤与康复指数的波斯语版本的跨文化适应性、信度和效度。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jan 9;25(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07171-0.
6
Running-related injury: How long does it take? Feasibility, preliminary evaluation, and German translation of the University of Wisconsin running and recovery index.与跑步相关的损伤:需要多长时间?威斯康星大学跑步和恢复指数的可行性、初步评估和德译。
Phys Ther Sport. 2021 Nov;52:204-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.09.007. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
7
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Nepali versions of numerical pain rating scale and global rating of change.数值疼痛评分量表和变化整体评分的尼泊尔文版本的翻译、跨文化调适和心理计量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Dec 4;15(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0812-8.
8
Injury-related psychological distress and the association with perceived running ability in injured runners.受伤跑者的与损伤相关的心理困扰及其与感知跑步能力的关系。
Phys Ther Sport. 2022 Mar;54:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.12.005. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
9
Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Nepali Translation of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale.跨文化调适与尼泊尔文版患者特异性功能量表的验证。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Aug;48(8):659-664. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7925. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
10
The Responsiveness and Interpretability of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index.肩部疼痛与功能障碍指数的反应性和可解释性
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Apr;47(4):278-286. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7079. Epub 2017 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Is the addition of running retraining to best standard care beneficial in runners with medial tibial stress syndrome? Protocol for a randomised controlled trial.跑步再训练对内侧胫骨应力综合征跑者最佳标准治疗是否有益?一项随机对照试验的方案。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2024 Jun;17(2):e12029. doi: 10.1002/jfa2.12029.
2
Cross cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Persian version of the university of Wisconsin running injury and recovery index.威斯康星大学跑步损伤与康复指数的波斯语版本的跨文化适应性、信度和效度。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jan 9;25(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07171-0.
3
Physical therapist awareness of diagnostic imaging referral jurisdictional scope of practice: an observational study.
物理治疗师对诊断成像转诊管辖权实践范围的认识:一项观察性研究。
J Man Manip Ther. 2024 Aug;32(4):435-445. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2296260. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
4
The effectiveness of telehealth gait retraining in addition to standard physical therapy treatment for overuse knee injuries in soldiers: a protocol for a randomized clinical trial.远程医疗步态再训练联合标准物理治疗对士兵过度使用性膝关节损伤的疗效:一项随机临床试验方案。
Trials. 2023 Oct 16;24(1):672. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07502-x.
5
"Biofeedback-based return to sport": individualization through objective assessments.“基于生物反馈的重返运动”:通过客观评估实现个性化
Front Physiol. 2023 Jun 12;14:1185556. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1185556. eCollection 2023.
6
Signs of Nervous System Sensitization in Female Runners with Chronic Patellofemoral Pain.患有慢性髌股疼痛的女性跑步者的神经系统致敏迹象。
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023 Feb 1;18(1):132-144. doi: 10.26603/001c.57603. eCollection 2023.
7
Sensor-based gait training to reduce contact time for runners with exercise-related lower leg pain: a randomised controlled trial.基于传感器的步态训练以减少与运动相关的小腿疼痛的跑步者的接触时间:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2022 Nov 3;8(4):e001293. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001293. eCollection 2022.
8
Injury-related psychological distress and the association with perceived running ability in injured runners.受伤跑者的与损伤相关的心理困扰及其与感知跑步能力的关系。
Phys Ther Sport. 2022 Mar;54:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.12.005. Epub 2021 Dec 27.