University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0SP, UK.
The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK.
BMC Urol. 2020 Oct 28;20(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00724-0.
Kidney cancer is often asymptomatic, leading to proposals for a screening programme. The views of the public towards introducing a new screening programme for kidney cancer are unknown. The aim of this study was to explore attitudes towards kidney cancer screening and factors influencing intention to attend a future screening programme.
We conducted an online population-based survey of 1021 adults aged 45-77 years. The main outcome measure was intention to attend four possible screening tests (urine, blood, ultrasound scan, low-dose CT) as well as extended low-dose CT scans within lung cancer screening programmes. We used multivariable regression to examine the association between intention and each screening test.
Most participants stated that they would be 'very likely' or 'likely' to undergo each of the screening tests [urine test: n = 961 (94.1%); blood test: n = 922 (90.3%); ultrasound: n = 914 (89.5%); low-dose CT: n = 804 (78.8%); lung CT: n = 962 (95.2%)]. Greater intention to attend was associated with higher general cancer worry and less perceived burden/inconvenience about the screening tests. Less worry about the screening test was also associated with higher intention to attend, but only in those with low general cancer worry (cancer worry scale ≤ 5). Compared with intention to take up screening with a urine test, participants were half as likely to report that they intended to undergo blood [OR 0.56 (0.43-0.73)] or ultrasound [OR 0.50 (0.38-0.67)] testing, and half as likely again to report that they intended to take part in a screening programme featuring a low dose CT scan for kidney cancer screening alone [OR 0.19 (0.14-0.27)].
Participants in this study expressed high levels of intention to accept an invitation to screening for kidney cancer, both within a kidney cancer specific screening programme and in conjunction with lung cancer screening. The choice of screening test is likely to influence uptake. Together these findings support on-going research into kidney cancer screening tests and the potential for combining kidney cancer screening with existing or new screening programmes.
肾癌常无症状,因此提出了筛查方案。公众对引入新的肾癌筛查方案的看法尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨公众对肾癌筛查的态度以及影响参加未来筛查计划的意愿的因素。
我们对 1021 名年龄在 45-77 岁的成年人进行了一项在线基于人群的调查。主要观察指标是参加四种可能的筛查测试(尿液、血液、超声扫描、低剂量 CT)以及在肺癌筛查计划中进行扩展的低剂量 CT 扫描的意愿。我们使用多变量回归来检查意向与每种筛查测试之间的关联。
大多数参与者表示,他们将非常可能或可能会接受每项筛查测试[尿液测试:n=961(94.1%);血液测试:n=922(90.3%);超声:n=914(89.5%);低剂量 CT:n=804(78.8%);肺 CT:n=962(95.2%)]。更高的参加意愿与更高的一般癌症担忧和对筛查测试的感知负担/不便有关。对筛查测试的担忧减少也与更高的参加意愿有关,但仅在那些癌症担忧较低的人(癌症担忧量表≤5)中才与更高的参加意愿有关。与参加尿液筛查的意愿相比,参与者报告说他们打算接受血液[OR 0.56(0.43-0.73)]或超声[OR 0.50(0.38-0.67)]检查的可能性要低一半,而又有一半的人再次表示打算参加一项单独针对肾脏癌症筛查的低剂量 CT 扫描的筛查计划[OR 0.19(0.14-0.27)]。
本研究中的参与者表示,他们非常愿意接受肾癌筛查的邀请,无论是在专门的肾癌筛查计划中,还是在与肺癌筛查相结合的情况下。筛查测试的选择可能会影响接受程度。这些发现共同支持对肾癌筛查测试的持续研究以及将肾癌筛查与现有或新的筛查计划相结合的可能性。