Suppr超能文献

黄斑神经节细胞-内丛状层厚度的自定义提取更精确地将结构测量与视野测试网格对准。

Custom extraction of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness more precisely co-localizes structural measurements with visual fields test grids.

机构信息

Centre for Eye Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.

School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 28;10(1):18527. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75599-0.

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate methods of extracting optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measurements over retinal locations corresponding to standard visual field (VF) test grids. A custom algorithm was developed to automatically extract GCIPL thickness measurements from locations corresponding to Humphrey Field Analyser 10-2 and 30-2 test grids over Goldmann II, III and V stimulus sizes from a healthy cohort of 478 participants. Differences between GCIPL thickness measurements based on VF test grids (VF-based paradigms) and the 8 × 8 grid, as per instrument review software, were analyzed, as were impacts of fovea to optic disc tilt and areas over which GCIPL thickness measurements were extracted. Significant differences between the VF-based paradigms and the 8 × 8 grid were observed at up to 55% of locations across the macula, with the greatest deviations at the fovea (median 25.5 μm, 95% CI 25.24-25.72 μm, P < .0001). While significant correlations with fovea to optic disc tilt were noted at up to 33% of locations distributed 6°-8° from the foveal center, there were no marked differences in GCIPL thickness measurements between VF-based paradigms using different stimulus sizes. As such, standard high-density OCT measurement paradigms do not adequately reflect GCIPL measurements at retinal locations tested with standard VF patterns, with the central macular region contributing most to the observed differences and with further correction required for fovea to optic disc tilt. Spatial direction of GCIPL thickness measurements will improve future comparisons of structure and function, thereby improving methods designed to detect pathology affecting the inner retina.

摘要

我们旨在评估从对应于标准视野(VF)测试网格的视网膜位置提取光学相干断层扫描(OCT)衍生的黄斑神经节细胞-内丛状层(GCIPL)厚度测量值的方法。开发了一种自定义算法,以从 478 名健康参与者的 Goldmann II、III 和 V 刺激大小的 Humphrey Field Analyser 10-2 和 30-2 测试网格的对应位置自动提取 GCIPL 厚度测量值。分析了基于 VF 测试网格(基于 VF 的范式)和根据仪器审查软件的 8×8 网格的 GCIPL 厚度测量值之间的差异,以及 GCIPL 厚度测量值提取的视盘倾斜和区域的影响。在整个黄斑区域多达 55%的位置观察到基于 VF 的范式与 8×8 网格之间存在显著差异,在黄斑中心凹处偏差最大(中位数为 25.5μm,95%CI 25.24-25.72μm,P<0.0001)。虽然在距离黄斑中心凹 6°-8°的多达 33%的位置观察到与视盘倾斜的显著相关性,但使用不同刺激大小的基于 VF 的范式之间的 GCIPL 厚度测量值没有明显差异。因此,标准高密度 OCT 测量范式不能充分反映在使用标准 VF 模式测试的视网膜位置的 GCIPL 测量值,中央黄斑区域对观察到的差异贡献最大,并且需要对视盘倾斜进行进一步校正。GCIPL 厚度测量值的空间方向将改善结构和功能的未来比较,从而改进旨在检测影响内视网膜的病理学的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1337/7595126/03aada124e9f/41598_2020_75599_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验