• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Mixture IRTree Model for Performance Decline and Nonignorable Missing Data.一种用于性能下降和不可忽略缺失数据的混合IRT树模型
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Dec;80(6):1168-1195. doi: 10.1177/0013164420914711. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
2
Unfolding IRT Models for Likert-Type Items With a Don't Know Option.具有“不知道”选项的李克特式项目的展开IRT模型
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 Oct;40(7):517-533. doi: 10.1177/0146621616664047. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
3
Modeling Rapid Guessing Behaviors in Computer-Based Testlet Items.基于计算机的分块试题中快速猜测行为的建模
Appl Psychol Meas. 2023 Jan;47(1):19-33. doi: 10.1177/01466216221125177. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
4
On the Treatment of Missing Item Responses in Educational Large-Scale Assessment Data: An Illustrative Simulation Study and a Case Study Using PISA 2018 Mathematics Data.教育大规模评估数据中缺失项目反应的处理:一项说明性模拟研究及使用2018年国际学生评估项目(PISA)数学数据的案例研究
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2021 Dec 14;11(4):1653-1687. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe11040117.
5
General mixture item response models with different item response structures: Exposition with an application to Likert scales.具有不同项目反应结构的通用混合项目反应模型:应用于李克特量表的阐述。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Dec;50(6):2325-2344. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0997-0.
6
Exploring the Effects of Item-Specific Factors in Sequential and IRTree Models.探索项目特异性因素在顺序和IRTree 模型中的作用。
Psychometrika. 2023 Sep;88(3):745-775. doi: 10.1007/s11336-023-09912-x. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
7
Mixture IRT Model With a Higher-Order Structure for Latent Traits.具有潜在特质高阶结构的混合IRT模型
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Apr;77(2):275-304. doi: 10.1177/0013164416640327. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
8
Co-occurring dominance and ideal point processes: A general IRTree framework for multidimensional item responding.共现优势与理想点过程:多维项目反应的一般 IRTree 框架。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7005-7025. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02405-4. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
9
Modeling Omitted and Not-Reached Items in IRT Models.在项目反应理论(IRT)模型中对遗漏和未达项目进行建模
Psychometrika. 2016 Nov 15. doi: 10.1007/s11336-016-9544-7.
10
Mixture Random-Effect IRT Models for Controlling Extreme Response Style on Rating Scales.用于控制量表极端反应风格的混合随机效应项目反应理论模型。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 2;7:1706. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01706. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Rater Cognition in Performance Assessment: A Mixed IRTree Approach.理解绩效评估中的评分者认知:一种混合IRTree方法。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2025 Apr 14:01466216251333578. doi: 10.1177/01466216251333578.
2
The Effect of Modeling Missing Data With IRTree Approach on Parameter Estimates Under Different Simulation Conditions.IRTree方法对缺失数据进行建模在不同模拟条件下对参数估计的影响。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Dec 23:00131644241306024. doi: 10.1177/00131644241306024.
3
Exploring the Influence of Response Styles on Continuous Scale Assessments: Insights From a Novel Modeling Approach.探索反应方式对连续量表评估的影响:来自一种新型建模方法的见解。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2025 Feb;85(1):178-214. doi: 10.1177/00131644241242789. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
4
A Stan tutorial on Bayesian IRTree models: Conventional models and explanatory extension.贝叶斯 IRTree 模型的 Stan 教程:常规模型和解释扩展。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):1817-1837. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02121-5. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
5
Dynamic Response Strategies: Accounting for Response Process Heterogeneity in IRTree Decision Nodes.动态响应策略:IRTree 决策节点中响应过程异质性的考虑。
Psychometrika. 2023 Dec;88(4):1354-1380. doi: 10.1007/s11336-023-09901-0. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
6
Modeling Rapid Guessing Behaviors in Computer-Based Testlet Items.基于计算机的分块试题中快速猜测行为的建模
Appl Psychol Meas. 2023 Jan;47(1):19-33. doi: 10.1177/01466216221125177. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
7
On the Treatment of Missing Item Responses in Educational Large-Scale Assessment Data: An Illustrative Simulation Study and a Case Study Using PISA 2018 Mathematics Data.教育大规模评估数据中缺失项目反应的处理:一项说明性模拟研究及使用2018年国际学生评估项目(PISA)数学数据的案例研究
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2021 Dec 14;11(4):1653-1687. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe11040117.

本文引用的文献

1
Item Position Effects Are Moderated by Changes in Test-Taking Effort.项目位置效应受应试努力变化的调节。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 Mar;41(2):115-129. doi: 10.1177/0146621616676791. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
2
Mixture IRT Model With a Higher-Order Structure for Latent Traits.具有潜在特质高阶结构的混合IRT模型
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Apr;77(2):275-304. doi: 10.1177/0013164416640327. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
3
Mixture Random-Effect IRT Models for Controlling Extreme Response Style on Rating Scales.用于控制量表极端反应风格的混合随机效应项目反应理论模型。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 2;7:1706. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01706. eCollection 2016.
4
Modeling Omitted and Not-Reached Items in IRT Models.在项目反应理论(IRT)模型中对遗漏和未达项目进行建模
Psychometrika. 2016 Nov 15. doi: 10.1007/s11336-016-9544-7.
5
A generalized item response tree model for psychological assessments.一种用于心理评估的广义项目反应树模型。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):1070-85. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0631-y.
6
Effects of the common scale setting in the assessment of differential item functioning.差异项目功能评估中常用量表设置的效果
Psychol Rep. 2014 Feb;114(1):104-25. doi: 10.2466/03.PR0.114k11w0.
7
Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety.工作记忆、数学成绩与数学焦虑。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Apr;14(2):243-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03194059.
8
Modelling non-ignorable missing-data mechanisms with item response theory models.使用项目反应理论模型对不可忽略的缺失数据机制进行建模。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2005 May;58(Pt 1):1-17. doi: 10.1348/000711005X47168.
9
Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation.成就动机的期望-价值理论
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000 Jan;25(1):68-81. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.

一种用于性能下降和不可忽略缺失数据的混合IRT树模型

A Mixture IRTree Model for Performance Decline and Nonignorable Missing Data.

作者信息

Huang Hung-Yu

机构信息

University of Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Dec;80(6):1168-1195. doi: 10.1177/0013164420914711. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1177/0013164420914711
PMID:33116331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7565117/
Abstract

In educational assessments and achievement tests, test developers and administrators commonly assume that test-takers attempt all test items with full effort and leave no blank responses with unplanned missing values. However, aberrant response behavior-such as performance decline, dropping out beyond a certain point, and skipping certain items over the course of the test-is inevitable, especially for low-stakes assessments and speeded tests due to low motivation and time limits, respectively. In this study, test-takers are classified as normal or aberrant using a mixture item response theory (IRT) modeling approach, and aberrant response behavior is described and modeled using item response trees (IRTrees). Simulations are conducted to evaluate the efficiency and quality of the new class of mixture IRTree model using WinBUGS with Bayesian estimation. The results show that the parameter recovery is satisfactory for the proposed mixture IRTree model and that treating missing values as ignorable or incorrect and ignoring possible performance decline results in biased estimation. Finally, the applicability of the new model is illustrated by means of an empirical example based on the Program for International Student Assessment.

摘要

在教育评估和成绩测试中,测试开发者和管理者通常假定考生会全力以赴完成所有测试项目,不会留下无计划缺失值的空白答案。然而,异常作答行为——如成绩下降、在某个时间点后退出以及在测试过程中跳过某些题目——是不可避免的,尤其是对于低风险评估和限时测试,分别是由于动机不足和时间限制。在本研究中,使用混合项目反应理论(IRT)建模方法将考生分类为正常或异常,并使用项目反应树(IRTrees)描述和建模异常作答行为。使用WinBUGS进行贝叶斯估计的模拟,以评估新的混合IRT树模型的效率和质量。结果表明,所提出的混合IRT树模型的参数恢复情况令人满意,将缺失值视为可忽略或错误处理以及忽略可能的成绩下降会导致有偏差的估计。最后,通过基于国际学生评估项目的实证例子说明了新模型的适用性。