• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

霍乱中的单剂量四环素

Single dose tetracycline in cholera.

作者信息

Islam M R

机构信息

International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

出版信息

Gut. 1987 Aug;28(8):1029-32. doi: 10.1136/gut.28.8.1029.

DOI:10.1136/gut.28.8.1029
PMID:3311904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1433127/
Abstract

A randomised clinical trial was carried out to explore the efficacy of single dose tetracycline therapy in cholera. One hundred and eighteen adult patients were assigned to receive either tetracycline in a single 1 g, or a single 2 g dose, or tetracycline 500 mg every six hours four times, or no antibiotics as controls. The means of total liquid stool volumes after treatment were lower in the single 1 g dose group (168.0 +/- 20.9 ml/kg), in single 2 g dose group (229.5 +/- 45.6 ml/kg), and multiple dose group (214 +/- 28.5 ml/kg), than in the control group (499.1 +/- 56.5 ml/kg) (p less than 0.05). Similarly, the means of durations of diarrhoea and intravenous fluid requirements were significantly lower in the single dose and multiple dose tetracycline groups, than in the controls (p less than 0.05). The mean durations of excretion of Vibrio cholerae were significantly shortened from 3.9 +/- 0.2 days in the control group to 1.9 +/- 0.2 days in single 1 g dose, to 2.2 +/- 0.4 days in single 2 g dose and 1.3 +/- 0.1 days in multiple dose groups, respectively (p less than 0.05). Three patients in the single 1 g dose group and two patients in single 2 g dose group had clinical relapses with excretion of V cholerae during the relapses, but this was not significantly more frequent than that in the multiple dose group (p greater than 0.05). These findings suggest that although multiple dose tetracycline therapy remains the best choice, a single dose of either 1 g or 2 g tetracycline appears to be a reasonable alternative for the treatment of cholera as an adjunct to rehydration therapy.

摘要

开展了一项随机临床试验,以探究单剂量四环素疗法治疗霍乱的疗效。118名成年患者被分配接受单剂量1克四环素、单剂量2克四环素、每6小时500毫克四环素共四次治疗,或不使用抗生素作为对照。治疗后,单剂量1克组(168.0±20.9毫升/千克)、单剂量2克组(229.5±45.6毫升/千克)和多剂量组(214±28.5毫升/千克)的总液体粪便量均值低于对照组(499.1±56.5毫升/千克)(p<0.05)。同样,单剂量和多剂量四环素组的腹泻持续时间均值和静脉补液需求量显著低于对照组(p<0.05)。霍乱弧菌的平均排泄时间从对照组的3.9±0.2天显著缩短至单剂量1克组的1.9±0.2天、单剂量2克组的2.2±0.4天和多剂量组的1.3±0.1天,分别(p<0.05)。单剂量1克组有3名患者和单剂量2克组有2名患者出现临床复发,复发期间有霍乱弧菌排出,但这一情况并不比多剂量组更频繁(p>0.05)。这些发现表明,虽然多剂量四环素疗法仍是最佳选择,但单剂量1克或2克四环素似乎是治疗霍乱的合理替代方案,可作为补液疗法的辅助手段。

相似文献

1
Single dose tetracycline in cholera.霍乱中的单剂量四环素
Gut. 1987 Aug;28(8):1029-32. doi: 10.1136/gut.28.8.1029.
2
Randomised controlled comparison of single-dose ciprofloxacin and doxycycline for cholera caused by Vibrio cholerae 01 or 0139.环丙沙星与强力霉素单剂量治疗霍乱弧菌01或0139引起的霍乱的随机对照比较
Lancet. 1996 Aug 3;348(9023):296-300. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)01180-4.
3
Randomised double blind trial of single dose doxycycline for treating cholera in adults.单剂量强力霉素治疗成人霍乱的随机双盲试验。
BMJ. 1990 Jun 23;300(6740):1619-21. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6740.1619.
4
Tetracycline in the treatment of severe cholera due to Vibrio cholerae O139 Bengal.四环素治疗由O139孟加拉霍乱弧菌引起的重症霍乱。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2002 Mar;20(1):18-25.
5
Single-dose treatment of cholera with furazolidone or tetracycline in a double-blind randomized trial.在一项双盲随机试验中用呋喃唑酮或四环素对霍乱进行单剂量治疗。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Sep;33(9):1447-50. doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.9.1447.
6
Controlled comparison of tetracycline and furazolidone in cholera.四环素与呋喃唑酮治疗霍乱的对照比较
Br Med J. 1968 Aug 3;3(5613):277-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5613.277.
7
Effects of doxycycline in actively purging cholera patients: a double-blind clinical trial.强力霉素对正在清除霍乱弧菌患者的疗效:一项双盲临床试验
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Oct;10(4):610-2. doi: 10.1128/AAC.10.4.610.
8
Rice-ORS versus glucose-ORS in management of severe cholera due to Vibrio cholerae O139 Bengal: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.米糠口服补液盐与葡萄糖口服补液盐用于治疗由霍乱弧菌O139孟加拉型引起的重症霍乱的疗效比较:一项随机对照临床试验
J Health Popul Nutr. 2003 Dec;21(4):325-31.
9
Comparative trial of five antimicrobial compounds in the treatment of cholera in adults.五种抗菌化合物治疗成人霍乱的对比试验。
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1995 Jan-Feb;89(1):103-6. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(95)90675-4.
10
Mechanism and treatment of diarrhoea due to Vibrio cholerae and Escherichia coli: roles of drugs and prostaglandins.霍乱弧菌和大肠杆菌所致腹泻的机制与治疗:药物和前列腺素的作用
Dan Med Bull. 1996 Apr;43(2):173-85.

引用本文的文献

1
Cholera rapid diagnostic tests at the host-microbe interface: Key Considerations for Global Deployments.宿主-微生物界面的霍乱快速诊断检测:全球部署的关键考量因素
medRxiv. 2025 May 29:2025.05.14.25327654. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.14.25327654.
2
Screening of Potential Bacteriophages for Cholera Therapy: A Comparative Genomic Approach.用于霍乱治疗的潜在噬菌体筛选:一种比较基因组学方法。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Mar 29;13:803933. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.803933. eCollection 2022.
3
Changing Susceptibility Pattern of O1 Isolates to Commonly Used Antibiotics in the Largest Diarrheal Disease Hospital in Bangladesh during 2000-2018.2000-2018 年孟加拉国最大腹泻病医院 O1 分离株对抗生素敏感性的变化模式。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Aug;103(2):652-658. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0058. Epub 2020 May 21.
4
Antimicrobial drugs for treating cholera.用于治疗霍乱的抗菌药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 19;2014(6):CD008625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008625.pub2.
5
The time of cholera.霍乱时期。
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2011 Spring;22(1):7-9. doi: 10.1155/2011/535764.
6
Chemoprophylaxis in contacts of patients with cholera: systematic review and meta-analysis.霍乱患者接触者的化学预防:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027060. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
7
Single-dose treatment of cholera with furazolidone or tetracycline in a double-blind randomized trial.在一项双盲随机试验中用呋喃唑酮或四环素对霍乱进行单剂量治疗。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Sep;33(9):1447-50. doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.9.1447.

本文引用的文献

1
RAPID IDENTIFICATION OF VIBRIO CHOLERAE BY DARKFIELD MICROSCOPY.通过暗视野显微镜快速鉴定霍乱弧菌
Bull World Health Organ. 1964;30(6):827-31.
2
Emergence of multiply antibiotic-resistant Vibrio cholerae in Bangladesh.孟加拉国多重耐药霍乱弧菌的出现。
J Infect Dis. 1980 Dec;142(6):939-42. doi: 10.1093/infdis/142.6.939.
3
Resistance to antimicrobial agents of Vibrio cholerae E1 Tor strains isolated during the fourth cholera epidemic in the United Republic of Tanzania.在坦桑尼亚联合共和国第四次霍乱疫情期间分离出的霍乱弧菌埃尔托生物型菌株对抗菌剂的耐药性
Bull World Health Organ. 1980;58(5):747-51.
4
Optimal antibiotic therapy in cholera.霍乱的最佳抗生素治疗
Bull World Health Organ. 1968;39(2):239-45.
5
Antibiotic therapy of cholera.霍乱的抗生素治疗
Bull World Health Organ. 1967;36(6):871-83.
6
The spectrum of cholera in rural Bangladesh. II. Comparison of El Tor Ogawa and classical Inaba infection.
Am J Epidemiol. 1972 Nov;96(5):342-51. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121465.
7
Single-dose doxycycline for cholera.单剂量强力霉素治疗霍乱。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Sep;14(3):462-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.14.3.462.