• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对专科筛查从业者进行结直肠癌风险降低培训计划对健康促进、知识和实践影响的定性评估。

A qualitative evaluation of the impact of a training programme on colorectal cancer risk reduction for Specialist Screening Practitioners on health promotion, knowledge and practice.

机构信息

Division of Population Health & Genomics, Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Jan;30(1):e13350. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13350. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1111/ecc.13350
PMID:33119181
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7900982/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most common cancer in the UK. It is estimated that around 50% of the disease burden is caused by lifestyle factors. This paper evaluates the impact of a training programme for Specialist Screening Practitioners (SSPs) on knowledge of CRC risk reduction and subsequent health promotion activities.

METHOD

Attendees (n = 21) were invited to participate in semi-structured qualitative telephone interviews developed in conjunction with programme organisers. An independent researcher undertook the interviews on the perceived impact of the training on knowledge about risk reduction, communicating health promotion messages and working practices.

RESULTS

Ten interviews were conducted. The programme was perceived to be successful in increasing knowledge about CRC risk and methods to promote behavioural change. Participants questioned the suitability of the endoscopy setting to communicate health promotion messages given patient anxiety pre-investigation and post-investigation elation after negative results. Key barriers to health promotion activities were time, hesitancy over raising issues that could not be easily discussed and scepticism about the ability of older adults to change their lifestyle.

CONCLUSIONS

Training on CRC risk reduction increased knowledge and behaviour change skills among SSPs. Further work is needed to explore opportunities to optimise the screening environment for health promotion activities.

摘要

目的

结直肠癌(CRC)是英国第四大常见癌症。据估计,约有 50%的疾病负担是由生活方式因素引起的。本文评估了为专科筛查从业者(SSP)提供培训计划对结直肠癌风险降低和随后的健康促进活动的影响。

方法

邀请参与者(n=21)参加半结构化定性电话访谈,该访谈是与项目组织者共同制定的。一名独立研究人员根据培训对降低风险相关知识、传播健康促进信息和工作实践的感知影响进行了访谈。

结果

进行了 10 次访谈。该计划被认为在提高对 CRC 风险和促进行为改变方法的认识方面取得了成功。参与者对在检查前患者焦虑和检查后阴性结果后患者兴奋的内镜环境下传播健康促进信息的适宜性提出了质疑。健康促进活动的主要障碍是时间、对无法轻松讨论的问题的犹豫以及对老年人改变生活方式能力的怀疑。

结论

CRC 风险降低培训提高了 SSP 对知识和行为改变技能的认识。需要进一步探索机会,以优化筛查环境以促进健康促进活动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36da/7900982/d728c2499b27/ECC-30-e13350-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36da/7900982/00af1d83ee8b/ECC-30-e13350-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36da/7900982/d728c2499b27/ECC-30-e13350-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36da/7900982/00af1d83ee8b/ECC-30-e13350-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36da/7900982/d728c2499b27/ECC-30-e13350-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A qualitative evaluation of the impact of a training programme on colorectal cancer risk reduction for Specialist Screening Practitioners on health promotion, knowledge and practice.对专科筛查从业者进行结直肠癌风险降低培训计划对健康促进、知识和实践影响的定性评估。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Jan;30(1):e13350. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13350. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
2
Colorectal cancer patients can be advocates for colorectal cancer screening for their siblings: A study on siblings' perspectives.结直肠癌患者可以成为其兄弟姐妹结直肠癌筛查的倡导者:对兄弟姐妹观点的研究。
Psychooncology. 2020 Dec;29(12):2028-2032. doi: 10.1002/pon.5496. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
3
Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding colorectal cancer screening among ethnic minority groups in the Netherlands - a qualitative study.荷兰少数族裔群体对结直肠癌筛查的认知、态度和信念——一项定性研究
Health Expect. 2016 Dec;19(6):1312-1323. doi: 10.1111/hex.12428. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
4
Psychosocial consequences of receiving false-positive colorectal cancer screening results: a qualitative study.接受结直肠癌症筛查假阳性结果的心理社会后果:一项定性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Jun;37(2):145-154. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1608040. Epub 2019 May 11.
5
Results from an Evaluation of the Georgia Colorectal Cancer Control Program's Community Education and Outreach Events, 2013.2013年佐治亚州结直肠癌控制项目社区教育与推广活动评估结果
J Cancer Educ. 2017 Jun;32(2):392-400. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0966-1.
6
Screening in spouses of colorectal cancer patients: a missed opportunity.对结直肠癌患者配偶进行筛查:错失的机会。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Apr;33(4):419-422. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-2975-0. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
7
Investigating Hispanic/Latino perceptions about colorectal cancer screening: a community-based approach to effective message design.调查西班牙裔/拉丁裔对结直肠癌筛查的看法:一种基于社区的有效信息设计方法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Oct;68(2):145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.04.004. Epub 2007 May 22.
8
Knowledge and Practices of Colorectal Cancer Early Detection Examinations in Jordan: A Cross Sectional Study.约旦结直肠癌早期检测检查的知识与实践:一项横断面研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Mar 26;20(3):831-838. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.3.831.
9
Concerns, perceived need and competing priorities: a qualitative exploration of decision-making and non-participation in a population-based flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme to prevent colorectal cancer.担忧、感知到的需求及相互竞争的优先事项:对一项基于人群的预防结直肠癌的柔性乙状结肠镜筛查计划中的决策制定和不参与情况的定性探索。
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 11;6(11):e012304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012304.
10
Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study.丹麦结直肠癌筛查项目中,全科医疗诊断活动的差异及受邀个体的检查结果:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Sep;36(3):281-290. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1487378. Epub 2018 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring cancer knowledge and sources of information among the public: An analytical study.探索公众的癌症知识及信息来源:一项分析性研究。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2025 Jul 7;17(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4820.
2
The experiences and perceptions of female breast cancer patients regarding weight management during and after treatment for oestrogen-receptor positive disease: a qualitative study.雌激素受体阳性疾病治疗期间和治疗后女性乳腺癌患者的体重管理体验和看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Nov 18;22(1):1189. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10238-7.
3
Survey on Mental Health Status and Quality of Life and Correlation among Patients with Permanent Stoma of Colorectal Tumor.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving Cancer Preventive Behaviors: A Randomized Trial of Tailored Lifestyle Feedback in Colorectal Cancer Screening.改善癌症预防行为:结直肠癌筛查中定制生活方式反馈的随机试验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Dec;27(12):1442-1449. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0268. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
2
Occult blood in faeces is associated with all-cause and non-colorectal cancer mortality.粪便隐血与全因死亡率和非结直肠癌死亡率相关。
Gut. 2018 Dec;67(12):2116-2123. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316483. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
3
Lifestyle advice to cancer survivors: a qualitative study on the perspectives of health professionals.
肛肠肿瘤永久性造口患者的心理健康状况、生活质量及相关性调查
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Sep 5;2022:5792312. doi: 10.1155/2022/5792312. eCollection 2022.
给癌症幸存者的生活方式建议:一项关于健康专业人员观点的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 27;8(3):e020313. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020313.
4
The fraction of cancer attributable to modifiable risk factors in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and the United Kingdom in 2015.2015 年英格兰、威尔士、苏格兰、北爱尔兰和英国归因于可改变风险因素的癌症比例。
Br J Cancer. 2018 Apr;118(8):1130-1141. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0029-6. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
5
Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research recommendations and colorectal cancer risk.遵循世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究学会的建议与结直肠癌风险
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;85:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.08.015. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
6
Determining cancer survivors' preferences to inform new models of follow-up care.确定癌症幸存者的偏好,以为新的后续护理模式提供参考。
Br J Cancer. 2016 Dec 6;115(12):1495-1503. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.352. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
7
Adherence to the WCRF/AICR Dietary Recommendations for Cancer Prevention and Risk of Cancer in Elderly from Europe and the United States: A Meta-Analysis within the CHANCES Project.遵循世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究所癌症预防饮食建议与欧美老年人癌症风险:CHANCES项目中的一项荟萃分析
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Jan;26(1):136-144. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0428. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
8
Screening and brief intervention for obesity in primary care: a parallel, two-arm, randomised trial.基层医疗中肥胖症的筛查与简短干预:一项平行双臂随机试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 19;388(10059):2492-2500. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31893-1. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
9
Type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of colorectal adenoma: a meta-analysis of observational studies.2型糖尿病与结直肠腺瘤风险:观察性研究的荟萃分析
BMC Cancer. 2016 Aug 17;16:642. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2685-3.
10
Sedation in Colonoscopy.结肠镜检查中的镇静
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2016 May;12(5):327-9.