Chen Guangliang, Xue Yunjing, Wei Jin, Duan Qing
Department of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital.
School of Medical Technology and Engineering, Fujian Medical University, University Town, Fuzhou, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 23;99(43):e22440. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022440.
To assess the prevalence and missed reporting rate of potential clinically-significant incidental findings (IFs) in the neck CTA scans.All consecutive patients undergoing neck CTA imaging, from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018, were retrospectively evaluated by a radiologist for the presence of incidental findings in the upper chest, lower head and neck regions. These incidental findings were subsequently classified into 3 categories in terms of clinical significance: Type I, highly significant, Type II, moderately significant; and Type III, mildly or not significant. Type I and Type II IFs were determined as potential clinically significant ones and were retrospectively analyzed by another 2 radiologists in consensus. The undiagnosed findings were designated as those that were not reported by the initial radiologists. The differences in the rate of unreported potential clinically significant IFs were compared between the chest group and head or neck group.A total of 376 potential clinically significant IFs were detected in 1,698 (91.19%) patients, of which 175 IFs were classified as highly significant findings (Type I), and 201 (53.46%) as moderately significant findings (Type II). The most common potential clinically significant findings included thyroid nodules (n = 88, 23.40%), pulmonary nodules (n = 56, 14.89%), sinus disease (n = 39, 10.37%), intracranial or cervical artery aneurysms (n = 30, 7.98%), enlarged lymph nodes (n = 24, 6.38%), and pulmonary embolism (n = 19, 5.05%). In addition, 184 (48.94%) of them were not mentioned in the initial report. The highest incidence of missed potential clinical findings were pulmonary embolism and pathologic fractures and erosions (100% for both). The unreported rate of the chest group was significantly higher than that of the head or neck one, regardless of Type I, Type II or all potential clinically significant IFs (χ = 32.151, χ = 31.211, χ = 65.286, respectively; P < .001 for all).Important clinically significant incidental findings are commonly found in a proportion of patients undergoing neck CTA, in which nearly half of these patients have had potential clinically significant IFs not diagnosed in the initial report. Therefore, radiologists should beware of the importance of and the necessity to identify incidental findings in neck CTA scans.
评估颈部CTA扫描中潜在临床显著偶然发现(IFs)的患病率和漏报率。
对2017年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间接受颈部CTA成像的所有连续患者进行回顾性评估,由一名放射科医生检查上胸部、头部和颈部下部区域是否存在偶然发现。这些偶然发现随后根据临床意义分为3类:I型,高度显著;II型,中度显著;III型,轻度或不显著。I型和II型IFs被确定为潜在临床显著发现,并由另外2名放射科医生进行一致性回顾性分析。未诊断出的发现被定义为最初放射科医生未报告的那些。比较胸部组与头部或颈部组未报告的潜在临床显著IFs发生率的差异。
在1698名(91.19%)患者中总共检测到376个潜在临床显著IFs,其中175个IFs被分类为高度显著发现(I型),201个(53.46%)为中度显著发现(II型)。最常见的潜在临床显著发现包括甲状腺结节(n = 88,23.40%)、肺结节(n = 56,14.89%)、鼻窦疾病(n = 39,10.37%)、颅内或颈动脉瘤(n = 30,7.98%)、肿大淋巴结(n = 24,6.38%)和肺栓塞(n = 19,5.05%)。此外,其中184个(48.94%)在最初报告中未提及。漏报的潜在临床发现发生率最高的是肺栓塞以及病理性骨折和侵蚀(两者均为100%)。无论I型、II型还是所有潜在临床显著IFs,胸部组的未报告率均显著高于头部或颈部组(χ = 32.151、χ = 31.211、χ = 65.286,P均<0.001)。
重要的临床显著偶然发现在接受颈部CTA检查的一部分患者中很常见,其中近一半患者的潜在临床显著IFs在最初报告中未被诊断出来。因此,放射科医生应注意在颈部CTA扫描中识别偶然发现的重要性和必要性。