• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高低海拔柳枝稷品种对一种谷类蚜虫虫害的防御反应差异。

Differential Defense Responses of Upland and Lowland Switchgrass Cultivars to a Cereal Aphid Pest.

机构信息

Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.

Wheat, Sorghum, and Forage Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 27;21(21):7966. doi: 10.3390/ijms21217966.

DOI:10.3390/ijms21217966
PMID:33120946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7672581/
Abstract

Yellow sugarcane aphid (YSA) (, Forbes) is a damaging pest on many grasses. Switchgrass ( L.), a perennial C4 grass, has been selected as a bioenergy feedstock because of its perceived resilience to abiotic and biotic stresses. Aphid infestation on switchgrass has the potential to reduce the yields and biomass quantity. Here, the global defense response of switchgrass cultivars Summer and Kanlow to YSA feeding was analyzed by RNA-seq and metabolite analysis at 5, 10, and 15 days after infestation. Genes upregulated by infestation were more common in both cultivars compared to downregulated genes. In total, a higher number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were found in the YSA susceptible cultivar (Summer), and fewer DEGs were observed in the YSA resistant cultivar (Kanlow). Interestingly, no downregulated genes were found in common between each time point or between the two switchgrass cultivars. Gene co-expression analysis revealed upregulated genes in Kanlow were associated with functions such as flavonoid, oxidation-response to chemical, or wax composition. Downregulated genes for the cultivar Summer were found in co-expression modules with gene functions related to plant defense mechanisms or cell wall composition. Global analysis of defense networks of the two cultivars uncovered differential mechanisms associated with resistance or susceptibility of switchgrass in response to YSA infestation. Several gene co-expression modules and transcription factors correlated with these differential defense responses. Overall, the YSA-resistant Kanlow plants have an enhanced defense even under aphid uninfested conditions.

摘要

黄脊甘蔗绵蚜(YSA)(Forbes)是许多禾本科植物的有害害虫。柳枝稷(L.)是一种多年生 C4 禾本科植物,因其对非生物和生物胁迫的潜在抗性而被选为生物能源饲料。蚜虫对柳枝稷的侵害有可能降低产量和生物量。在这里,通过 RNA-seq 和代谢物分析,分析了柳枝稷品种 Summer 和 Kanlow 对 YSA 取食的全球防御反应,分别在取食后 5、10 和 15 天进行分析。与下调基因相比,受侵染上调的基因在两个品种中更为常见。总共,在 YSA 易感品种(Summer)中发现了更多的差异表达基因(DEGs),而在 YSA 抗性品种(Kanlow)中观察到的 DEGs 较少。有趣的是,在每个时间点或在两个柳枝稷品种之间没有发现共同下调的基因。基因共表达分析表明,Kanlow 上调的基因与类黄酮、对化学物质的氧化反应或蜡组成等功能有关。夏季品种下调的基因在与植物防御机制或细胞壁组成相关的基因功能的共表达模块中发现。对两个品种防御网络的全面分析揭示了与柳枝稷对 YSA 侵害的抗性或敏感性相关的不同机制。几个基因共表达模块和转录因子与这些差异防御反应相关。总的来说,YSA 抗性的 Kanlow 植物即使在没有蚜虫侵害的情况下也具有增强的防御能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c81/7672581/bc13c87c2275/ijms-21-07966-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c81/7672581/21cdef0b20da/ijms-21-07966-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c81/7672581/888d0907c68a/ijms-21-07966-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c81/7672581/8e23c68cdd4f/ijms-21-07966-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c81/7672581/853fa3190019/ijms-21-07966-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c81/7672581/5e651d4b1719/ijms-21-07966-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c81/7672581/0bc0231ba225/ijms-21-07966-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c81/7672581/bc13c87c2275/ijms-21-07966-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c81/7672581/21cdef0b20da/ijms-21-07966-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c81/7672581/888d0907c68a/ijms-21-07966-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c81/7672581/8e23c68cdd4f/ijms-21-07966-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c81/7672581/853fa3190019/ijms-21-07966-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c81/7672581/5e651d4b1719/ijms-21-07966-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c81/7672581/0bc0231ba225/ijms-21-07966-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c81/7672581/bc13c87c2275/ijms-21-07966-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Differential Defense Responses of Upland and Lowland Switchgrass Cultivars to a Cereal Aphid Pest.高低海拔柳枝稷品种对一种谷类蚜虫虫害的防御反应差异。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 27;21(21):7966. doi: 10.3390/ijms21217966.
2
Aphid-Responsive Defense Networks in Hybrid Switchgrass.杂交柳枝稷中的蚜虫响应防御网络
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jul 30;11:1145. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01145. eCollection 2020.
3
Fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda Smith) feeding elicits differential defense responses in upland and lowland switchgrass.秋黏虫(Spodoptera frugiperda Smith)取食会引起旱地和低地柳枝稷产生不同的防御反应。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 13;14(6):e0218352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218352. eCollection 2019.
4
Transcriptional analysis of defense mechanisms in upland tetraploid switchgrass to greenbugs.高地四倍体柳枝稷对麦二叉蚜防御机制的转录分析
BMC Plant Biol. 2017 Feb 16;17(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12870-017-0998-2.
5
Divergent Switchgrass Cultivars Modify Cereal Aphid Transcriptomes.不同的柳枝稷品种改变了禾谷缢管蚜的转录组。
J Econ Entomol. 2019 Aug 3;112(4):1887-1901. doi: 10.1093/jee/toz053.
6
Insect and plant-derived miRNAs in greenbug (Schizaphis graminum) and yellow sugarcane aphid (Sipha flava) revealed by deep sequencing.通过深度测序揭示的麦二叉蚜(Schizaphis graminum)和甘蔗黄蚜(Sipha flava)中昆虫和植物来源的微小RNA
Gene. 2017 Jan 30;599:68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
7
Transcriptome divergence during leaf development in two contrasting switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) cultivars.转录组在两个不同柳枝稷(Panicum virgatum L.)品种叶片发育过程中的差异。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 12;14(9):e0222080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222080. eCollection 2019.
8
Evaluation of tetraploid switchgrass (Poales: Poaceae) populations for host suitability and differential resistance to four cereal aphids.四倍体柳枝稷(禾本科:禾本科)种群对四种禾本科蚜虫的宿主适宜性和差异抗性评估。
J Econ Entomol. 2014 Feb;107(1):424-31. doi: 10.1603/ec13315.
9
Contrasting metabolism in perenniating structures of upland and lowland switchgrass plants late in the growing season.生长季后期高地和低地柳枝稷植物多年生结构中的代谢差异。
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 18;9(8):e105138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105138. eCollection 2014.
10
Transcriptome analysis of heat stress response in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.).热应激响应转录组分析在柳枝稷(Panicum virgatum L.)中。
BMC Plant Biol. 2013 Oct 6;13:153. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-153.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural and Interactional Analysis of the Flavonoid Pathway Proteins: Chalcone Synthase, Chalcone Isomerase and Chalcone Isomerase-like Protein.类黄酮途径蛋白的结构与相互作用分析:查尔酮合酶、查尔酮异构酶和查尔酮异构酶样蛋白。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 May 22;25(11):5651. doi: 10.3390/ijms25115651.
2
Dynamic Reconfiguration of Switchgrass Proteomes in Response to Rust () Infection.柳枝稷蛋白质组对锈病感染的动态重配置
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Sep 27;24(19):14630. doi: 10.3390/ijms241914630.
3
Activity of Cytosolic Ascorbate Peroxidase (APX) from against Ascorbate and Phenylpropanoids.

本文引用的文献

1
Jasmonic Acid-Isoleucine (JA-Ile) Is Involved in the Host-Plant Resistance Mechanism Against the Soybean Aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae).茉莉酸异亮氨酸(JA-Ile)参与了大豆蚜(半翅目:蚜科)对宿主植物的抗性机制。
J Econ Entomol. 2020 Dec 9;113(6):2972-2978. doi: 10.1093/jee/toaa221.
2
Aphid-Responsive Defense Networks in Hybrid Switchgrass.杂交柳枝稷中的蚜虫响应防御网络
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jul 30;11:1145. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01145. eCollection 2020.
3
Environmentally responsive QTL controlling surface wax load in switchgrass.
抗坏血酸过氧化物酶(APX)对胞质抗坏血酸和苯丙烷类的活性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 16;24(2):1778. doi: 10.3390/ijms24021778.
4
Temporal regulation of cold transcriptional response in switchgrass.柳枝稷中冷转录反应的时间调控
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Oct 10;13:998400. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.998400. eCollection 2022.
环境响应 QTL 控制柳枝稷表面蜡质负荷。
Theor Appl Genet. 2020 Nov;133(11):3119-3137. doi: 10.1007/s00122-020-03659-0. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
4
Ento(o)mics: the intersection of 'omic' approaches to decipher plant defense against sap-sucking insect pests.昆虫组学:“组学”方法解析植物抵御刺吸式昆虫害虫防御作用的交点。
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2020 Aug;56:153-161. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
5
Comparative transcriptomics revealed differential regulation of defense related genes in Brassica juncea leading to successful and unsuccessful infestation by aphid species.比较转录组学揭示了芸薹属植物防御相关基因的差异调控,导致蚜虫物种的成功和不成功定殖。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 29;10(1):10583. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66217-0.
6
A Comprehensive Analysis of Wheat Resistance to Rhopalosiphum padi (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Brazilian Wheat Cultivars.巴西小麦品种对禾谷缢管蚜(半翅目:蚜科)抗性的综合分析。
J Econ Entomol. 2020 Jun 6;113(3):1493-1503. doi: 10.1093/jee/toaa059.
7
Geographic variation in the genetic basis of resistance to leaf rust between locally adapted ecotypes of the biofuel crop switchgrass (Panicum virgatum).生物燃料作物柳枝稷(Panicum virgatum)本地适应生态型之间对叶锈病抗性遗传基础的地理变异。
New Phytol. 2020 Sep;227(6):1696-1708. doi: 10.1111/nph.16555. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
8
An aphid effector promotes barley susceptibility through suppression of defence gene expression.一种蚜虫效应因子通过抑制防御基因表达促进大麦易感性。
J Exp Bot. 2020 May 9;71(9):2796-2807. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa043.
9
Defenses against Virus and Vector: A Phloem-Biological Perspective on RTM- and SLI1-Mediated Resistance to Potyviruses and Aphids.抵御病毒和介体:韧皮部生物学视角下的 RTM 和 SLI1 介导的抗马铃薯 Y 病毒和蚜虫。
Viruses. 2020 Jan 22;12(2):129. doi: 10.3390/v12020129.
10
Comparative transcriptomic and metabolic analysis of wild and domesticated wheat genotypes reveals differences in chemical and physical defense responses against aphids.比较野生和驯化小麦基因型的转录组和代谢分析揭示了它们在抵御蚜虫的化学和物理防御反应方面的差异。
BMC Plant Biol. 2020 Jan 13;20(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-2214-z.