• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 IMPACT 研究中,比较了西班牙队列中 COPD 患者中 FF/UMEC/VI 与 FF/VI 和 UMEC/VI 的疗效:亚组分析。

Efficacy of FF/UMEC/VI compared with FF/VI and UMEC/VI in patients with COPD: subgroup analysis of the Spain cohort in IMPACT.

机构信息

Servicio de Neumología, IISAragón, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.

CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2020 Jan-Dec;14:1753466620963021. doi: 10.1177/1753466620963021.

DOI:10.1177/1753466620963021
PMID:33121372
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7607727/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The IMPACT trial has compared the benefit in the reduction of moderate/severe exacerbations of single inhaler triple therapy (SITT) with fluticasone furoate (FF)/umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VI) dual therapy with FF/VI (ICS/LABA) and UMEC/VI (LAMA/LABA) in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive disease (COPD). This study performs a subgroup analysis of the cohort from Spain in the IMPACT study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In IMPACT, a 52-week randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study ( = 10,355), patients ⩾40 years of age with COPD and ⩾1 moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous year were randomized 2:2:1 to once-daily FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg, FF/VI 100/25 µg or UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg administered via the Ellipta inhaler. Here, we present a subgroup analysis of the 499 patients from Spain, included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population in the study. Endpoint assessed included exposure-adjusted rate of moderate and severe exacerbations.

RESULTS

In the Spain cohort, the exposure-adjusted rate of on-treatment moderate/severe COPD exacerbations per year for FF/UMEC/VI was 1.31 1.43 and 1.57 for FF/VI and UMEC/VI, respectively. No new adverse events were identified. The results are consistent with those observed in the overall ITT study population.

CONCLUSION

In the Spain cohort of the IMPACT study, patients receiving triple therapy with FF/UMEC/VI had a lower exposure-adjusted rate of exacerbations compared with FF/VI and UMEC/VI, similar to the overall population. A Phase III, 52 Week, Randomized, Double-blind, 3-arm Parallel Group Study, Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of the Fixed Dose Triple Combination FF/UMEC/VI With the Fixed Dose Dual Combinations of FF/VI and UMEC/VI, All Administered Once-daily in the Morning Via a Dry Powder Inhaler in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=CTT116855/ https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02164513: GSK (CTT116855/NCT02164513).

摘要

目的

IMPACT 试验比较了氟替卡松糠酸酯(FF)/乌美溴铵(UMEC)/维兰特罗(VI)三联单吸入器治疗与 FF/VI(ICS/LABA)和 UMEC/VI(LAMA/LABA)双联治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中中度/重度加重的获益。本研究对 IMPACT 研究中西班牙队列进行了亚组分析。

材料和方法

在 IMPACT 中,一项为期 52 周的随机、双盲、平行组、多中心研究( = 10355),年龄 ⩾40 岁、前一年有 ⩾1 次中度/重度加重的 COPD 患者按 2:2:1 比例随机分配至每日一次 FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 μg、FF/VI 100/25 μg 或 UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg,通过 Ellipta 吸入器给药。在此,我们展示了研究中意向治疗(ITT)人群中来自西班牙的 499 名患者的亚组分析。评估的终点包括治疗中调整后的中度和重度 COPD 加重发生率。

结果

在西班牙队列中,FF/UMEC/VI 的治疗中调整后的每年中度/重度 COPD 加重发生率分别为 1.31 比 1.43 和 1.57 比 FF/VI 和 UMEC/VI。未发现新的不良事件。结果与总体 ITT 研究人群一致。

结论

在 IMPACT 研究的西班牙队列中,接受 FF/UMEC/VI 三联治疗的患者与 FF/VI 和 UMEC/VI 相比,治疗中调整后的加重发生率较低,与总体人群相似。一项为期 52 周、随机、双盲、3 臂平行组研究,比较了氟替卡松糠酸酯/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗固定剂量三联复方与氟替卡松/维兰特罗和乌美溴铵/维兰特罗固定剂量双重组合,均每日一次,在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中通过干粉吸入器给药:https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=CTT116855/https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02164513: GSK(CTT116855/NCT02164513)。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of FF/UMEC/VI compared with FF/VI and UMEC/VI in patients with COPD: subgroup analysis of the Spain cohort in IMPACT.在 IMPACT 研究中,比较了西班牙队列中 COPD 患者中 FF/UMEC/VI 与 FF/VI 和 UMEC/VI 的疗效:亚组分析。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2020 Jan-Dec;14:1753466620963021. doi: 10.1177/1753466620963021.
2
The IMPACT Study - Single Inhaler Triple Therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) Versus FF/VI And UMEC/VI In Patients With COPD: Efficacy And Safety In A Japanese Population.IMPACT研究——慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者使用单吸入器三联疗法(FF/UMEC/VI)与FF/VI及UMEC/VI的对比:日本人群中的疗效与安全性
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Dec 6;14:2849-2861. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S226601. eCollection 2019.
3
Single-inhaler triple therapy fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone furoate/vilanterol and umeclidinium/vilanterol in patients with COPD: results on cardiovascular safety from the IMPACT trial.在 COPD 患者中,氟替卡松富马酸酯/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗单吸入器三联疗法与氟替卡松富马酸酯/维兰特罗和乌美溴铵/维兰特罗的比较:IMPACT 试验心血管安全性结果。
Respir Res. 2020 Jun 5;21(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01398-w.
4
The effect of exacerbation history on outcomes in the IMPACT trial.在 IMPACT 试验中,加重病史对结果的影响。
Eur Respir J. 2020 May 21;55(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01921-2019. Print 2020 May.
5
Effect of Age on the Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple-Therapy Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Patients With COPD: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Informing the Pathway of COPD Treatment Trial.年龄对 COPD 患者每日一次单吸入器三重复合治疗氟替卡松富马酸酯/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗疗效和安全性的影响:COPD 治疗途径研究的事后分析。
Chest. 2021 Mar;159(3):985-995. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.09.253. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
6
Single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone furoate/vilanterol plus umeclidinium using two inhalers for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized non-inferiority study.氟替卡松富马酸酯/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗单吸入器与氟替卡松富马酸酯/维兰特罗加乌美溴铵两吸入器治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较:一项随机非劣效性研究。
Respir Res. 2018 Jan 25;19(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0724-0.
7
Cost-Effectiveness Of Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy In COPD: The IMPACT Trial.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)每日一次单吸入器三联疗法的成本效益:IMPACT试验
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Nov 29;14:2681-2695. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S216072. eCollection 2019.
8
Efficacy and safety of once-daily single-inhaler triple therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) versus FF/VI in patients with inadequately controlled asthma (CAPTAIN): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3A trial.每日一次单吸入器三联疗法(FF/UMEC/VI)与FF/VI治疗哮喘控制不佳患者的疗效和安全性(CAPTAIN):一项双盲、随机、3A期试验
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Jan;9(1):69-84. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30389-1. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
9
Single inhaler triple therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) versus FF/VI and UMEC/VI in patients with COPD: subgroup analysis of the China cohort in the IMPACT trial.在 COPD 患者中,三联吸入治疗(FF/UMEC/VI)与 FF/VI 和 UMEC/VI 的比较:IMPACT 试验中中国队列的亚组分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Jan;37(1):145-155. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1844646. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
10
A randomized, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25 μg on health-related quality of life in patients with COPD.一项评估乌美溴铵/维兰特罗62.5/25μg对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者健康相关生活质量疗效的随机平行组研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 May 9;11:971-9. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S102962. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of comparative efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus other bronchodilators in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.乌美溴铵/维兰特罗与其他支气管扩张剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效比较评估:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):609. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03445-4.

本文引用的文献

1
International trends in COPD mortality, 1995-2017.1995 - 2017年慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)死亡率的国际趋势
Eur Respir J. 2019 Dec 19;54(6). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01791-2019. Print 2019 Dec.
2
Triple therapy in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.三联疗法治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2018 Nov 6;363:k4388. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4388.
3
Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple versus Dual Therapy in Patients with COPD.COPD 患者每日一次单吸入器三联与双联治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 3;378(18):1671-1680. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1713901. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
4
Initiation of triple therapy maintenance treatment among patients with COPD in the US.美国慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者三联疗法维持治疗的启动情况。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Dec 22;12:73-83. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S122013. eCollection 2017.
5
A phase III randomised controlled trial of single-dose triple therapy in COPD: the IMPACT protocol.一项 COPD 单次三联疗法的 III 期随机对照试验:IMPACT 方案。
Eur Respir J. 2016 Aug;48(2):320-30. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02165-2015. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
6
Inhaled corticosteroids and the increased risk of pneumonia: what's new? A 2015 updated review.吸入性糖皮质激素与肺炎风险增加:有何新进展?2015年更新综述。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2016 Jun;10(3):235-55. doi: 10.1177/1753465816630208. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
7
Prevention of acute exacerbations of COPD: American College of Chest Physicians and Canadian Thoracic Society Guideline.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重的预防:美国胸科医师学会和加拿大胸科学会指南
Chest. 2015 Apr;147(4):894-942. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-1676.
8
Treatment evolution after COPD diagnosis in the UK primary care setting.英国初级医疗环境中慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)诊断后的治疗演变
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 2;9(9):e105296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105296. eCollection 2014.
9
[Triple therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].[慢性阻塞性肺疾病的三联疗法]
Arch Bronconeumol. 2010;46 Suppl 8:25-30. doi: 10.1016/S0300-2896(10)70064-8.