Laboratory of Physiological Sciences and Department of Pharmacy of the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Department of Pharmacy, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
BMJ. 2018 Nov 6;363:k4388. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4388.
To compare the rate of moderate to severe exacerbations between triple therapy and dual therapy or monotherapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane databases, and clinical trial registries searched from inception to April 2018.
Randomised controlled trials comparing triple therapy with dual therapy or monotherapy in patients with COPD were eligible. Efficacy and safety outcomes of interest were also available.
Data were collected independently. Meta-analyses were conducted to calculate rate ratios, hazard ratios, risk ratios, and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Quality of evidence was summarised in accordance with GRADE methodology (grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation).
21 trials (19 publications) were included. Triple therapy consisted of a long acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), long acting β agonist (LABA), and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). Triple therapy was associated with a significantly reduced rate of moderate or severe exacerbations compared with LAMA monotherapy (rate ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.85), LAMA and LABA (0.78, 0.70 to 0.88), and ICS and LABA (0.77, 0.66 to 0.91). Trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and quality of life were favourable with triple therapy. The overall safety profile of triple therapy is reassuring, but pneumonia was significantly higher with triple therapy than with dual therapy of LAMA and LABA (relative risk 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.25 to 1.87).
Use of triple therapy resulted in a lower rate of moderate or severe exacerbations of COPD, better lung function, and better health related quality of life than dual therapy or monotherapy in patients with advanced COPD.
Prospero CRD42018077033.
比较慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者三联疗法与双联疗法或单药治疗的中重度加重发生率。
系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
从创建到 2018 年 4 月,检索了 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 数据库和临床试验注册处。
比较三联疗法与 COPD 患者双联疗法或单药治疗的随机对照试验符合入选标准。还提供了感兴趣的疗效和安全性结局。
数据由独立人员收集。进行荟萃分析以计算率比、风险比、风险比和均数差值及其 95%置信区间。证据质量按照 GRADE 方法(推荐评估、制定和评价)进行总结。
共纳入 21 项试验(19 篇文献)。三联疗法由长效抗毒蕈碱药(LAMA)、长效β激动剂(LABA)和吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)组成。与 LAMA 单药治疗相比,三联疗法与中重度加重发生率显著降低相关(率比 0.71,95%置信区间 0.60 至 0.85),与 LAMA 和 LABA(0.78,0.70 至 0.88),以及 ICS 和 LABA(0.77,0.66 至 0.91)。三联疗法对 1 秒用力呼气量(FEV1)和生活质量的低谷期有好处。三联疗法的整体安全性状况令人放心,但肺炎发生率明显高于 LAMA 和 LABA 的双联治疗(相对风险 1.53,95%置信区间 1.25 至 1.87)。
在晚期 COPD 患者中,与双联疗法或单药治疗相比,三联疗法可降低 COPD 中重度加重发生率,改善肺功能和健康相关生活质量。
PROSPERO(国际前瞻性注册研究登记号)CRD42018077033。