Sandberg R, Balkfors B, Nilsson B, Westlin N
Department of Orthopaedics, Malmö General Hospital, Lund University, Sweden.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Oct;69(8):1120-6.
Two hundred consecutively seen patients who had an injury to either the anterior cruciate ligament or the medial collateral ligament, or both, were randomly allocated to treatment by either conservative or a surgical regimen. Injuries to the medial collateral ligament could not be demonstrated to benefit from surgical treatment in any respect--with or without surgery the results were excellent. With injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament, recovery was more rapid without surgery but otherwise the results differed between the groups in only one respect: the pivot-shift test was more often positive after conservative treatment. The results were good in both treatment groups even though most of the patients who had an injury of the anterior cruciate ligament were somewhat less pleased with the outcome after a period of time.
连续就诊的200例前交叉韧带或内侧副韧带或两者均损伤的患者被随机分为保守治疗组或手术治疗组。内侧副韧带损伤在任何方面都未显示出手术治疗的益处——无论是否手术,结果都非常好。对于前交叉韧带损伤,非手术治疗恢复更快,但两组结果仅在一个方面有所不同:保守治疗后轴移试验阳性更为常见。尽管大多数前交叉韧带损伤患者在一段时间后对结果不太满意,但两个治疗组的结果都很好。