Svantesson Jasmine, Piussi Ramana, Weissglas Elin, Svantesson Eleonor, Horvath Alexandra, Börjesson Erik, Williams Andy, Prill Robert, Samuelsson Kristian, Hamrin Senorski Eric
Sportrehab, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Health and Rehabilitation, University of Gothenburg, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Goteborg, Sweden.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2024 Jun 25;10(2):e001750. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001750. eCollection 2024.
The purpose of this study was to review the current literature regarding the non-operative treatment of isolated medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries.
Systematic review, registered in the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/E9CP4).
The Embase, MEDLINE and PEDro databases were searched; last search was performed on December 2023.
Peer-reviewed original reports from studies that included information about individuals who sustained an isolated MCL injury with non-surgical treatment as an intervention, or reports comparing surgical with non-surgical treatment were eligible for inclusion. Included reports were synthesised qualitatively. Risk of bias was assessed with the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies. Certainty of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation.
A total of 26 reports (1912 patients) were included, of which 18 were published before the year 2000 and 8 after. No differences in non-operative treatment were reported between grade I and II injuries, where immediate weight bearing and ambulation were tolerated, and rehabilitation comprised different types of strengthening exercises with poorly reported details. Some reports used immobilisation with a brace as a treatment method, while others did not use any equipment. The use of a brace and duration of use was inconsistently reported.
There is substantial heterogeneity and lack of detail regarding the non-operative treatment of isolated MCL injuries. This should prompt researchers and clinicians to produce high-quality evidence studies on the promising non-operative treatment of isolated MCL injuries to aid in decision-making and guide rehabilitation after MCL injury.
Level I, systematic review.
本研究旨在回顾当前关于孤立性内侧副韧带(MCL)损伤非手术治疗的文献。
系统评价,已在开放科学框架(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/E9CP4)注册。
检索了Embase、MEDLINE和PEDro数据库;最后一次检索于2023年12月进行。
来自研究的同行评审原始报告,这些研究包括有关接受非手术治疗作为干预措施的孤立性MCL损伤个体的信息,或比较手术与非手术治疗的报告有资格纳入。纳入的报告进行了定性综合。使用非随机研究偏倚风险评估工具评估偏倚风险。使用推荐分级评估、制定和评价确定证据的确定性。
共纳入26篇报告(1912例患者),其中18篇发表于2000年之前,8篇发表于2000年之后。I级和II级损伤在非手术治疗方面未报告差异,I级和II级损伤患者可立即负重和行走,康复包括不同类型的强化锻炼,但细节报道不佳。一些报告使用支具固定作为治疗方法,而其他报告未使用任何设备。支具的使用及其持续时间报告不一致。
关于孤立性MCL损伤的非手术治疗存在很大的异质性且缺乏细节。这应促使研究人员和临床医生针对有前景的孤立性MCL损伤非手术治疗开展高质量的证据研究,以帮助决策并指导MCL损伤后的康复。
I级,系统评价。