• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

决策参与量表中文版(DES-10)的因素分析及心理测量学特性调适

Factor Analysis and Psychometric Properties Adaption of Chinese Version of the Decisional Engagement Scale (DES-10).

作者信息

Wang Feijie, Huang Lijie, Zhang Hongmei, Jiang Hongxia, Chang Xiaoxia, Chu Yinping, Wang Zhixia, Zhang Xiaoli

机构信息

Department of Urinary Surgery, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University Peoples Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450003, People's Republic of China.

Nursing Department, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450003, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Oct 22;14:2027-2034. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S266687. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S266687
PMID:33122896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7588833/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To translate and validate the DES-10 into Chinese and adapt the DES-10 among Chinese prostate cancer patients. To explore the impact of demographic data on the SDM of Chinese prostate cancer patients.

METHODS

Data were collected from December 2019 to January 2020 from four hospitals among prostatic cancer patients in Henan Province, by convenience sampling method. A demographic questionnaire, DES-10, and 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) were administered. The exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was carried out to test the content, construct, reliability, and concurrent validity of the translated DES-10. Then, Pearson's correlation, -test, and analysis of variance were used to test the demographic difference of DES-10.

RESULTS

A total of 380 prostatic cancer patients completed the survey (96% response rate). The total score of DES-10 was 71.16±17.14. The Cronbach's ɑ coefficient was 0.87. Single factor structure was confirmed by exploratory factor analysis (explaining 50.14% of the variance). Model fitting indexes (RMSEA=0.07, CMIN/DF=2.92) were acceptable. The DES-10 scale showed good validity with the SDM-Q-9 as the criterion. Age, marital status, homeplace, and household monthly income could affect the shared decision-making of prostatic cancer patients.

CONCLUSION

The DES-10 was demonstrated to be a valid and reliable scale to assess the prostatic cancer patient's engagement in health care decision-making. And it is culturally appropriate for use in China. The influence of age, marital status, homeplace, and household monthly income should be considered in promoting patients' participation in shared decision-making.

摘要

目的

将DES - 10翻译成中文并进行验证,使其适用于中国前列腺癌患者。探讨人口统计学数据对中国前列腺癌患者共同决策的影响。

方法

于2019年12月至2020年1月,采用便利抽样法从河南省四家医院的前列腺癌患者中收集数据。发放人口统计学调查问卷、DES - 10和9项共同决策调查问卷(SDM - Q - 9)。进行探索性和验证性因素分析,以检验翻译后的DES - 10的内容、结构、信度和同时效度。然后,使用Pearson相关性分析、t检验和方差分析来检验DES - 10的人口统计学差异。

结果

共有380例前列腺癌患者完成调查(应答率为96%)。DES - 10的总分为71.16±17.14。Cronbach's α系数为0.87。探索性因素分析证实了单因素结构(解释了50.14%的方差)。模型拟合指数(RMSEA = 0.07,CMIN/DF = 2.92)可接受。以SDM - Q - 9为标准,DES - 10量表显示出良好的效度。年龄、婚姻状况、籍贯和家庭月收入会影响前列腺癌患者的共同决策。

结论

DES - 10被证明是评估前列腺癌患者参与医疗保健决策的有效且可靠的量表。并且它在中国具有文化适用性。在促进患者参与共同决策时,应考虑年龄、婚姻状况、籍贯和家庭月收入的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6707/7588833/e92c38a4cbe2/PPA-14-2027-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6707/7588833/d827dce72d42/PPA-14-2027-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6707/7588833/e92c38a4cbe2/PPA-14-2027-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6707/7588833/d827dce72d42/PPA-14-2027-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6707/7588833/e92c38a4cbe2/PPA-14-2027-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Factor Analysis and Psychometric Properties Adaption of Chinese Version of the Decisional Engagement Scale (DES-10).决策参与量表中文版(DES-10)的因素分析及心理测量学特性调适
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Oct 22;14:2027-2034. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S266687. eCollection 2020.
2
[Reliability and validity for Chinese version of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire].《9项共同决策问卷中文版的信效度研究》
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019 Jul 28;44(7):823-829. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2019.180316.
3
Validity and reliability of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in a national survey in Hungary.匈牙利全国性调查中 9 项共享决策问卷(SDM-Q-9)的有效性和可靠性。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jun;20(Suppl 1):43-55. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01061-2. Epub 2019 May 20.
4
Psychometric Evaluation of the Japanese 9-Item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire and Its Association with Decision Conflict and Patient Factors in Japanese Primary Care.日本9项共同决策问卷的心理测量学评价及其与日本初级保健中决策冲突和患者因素的关联
JMA J. 2020 Jul 15;3(3):208-215. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2019-0069. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
5
Validation of the Spanish version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire.9项共同决策问卷西班牙语版本的验证
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2143-53. doi: 10.1111/hex.12183. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
6
Psychometric properties of the SDM-Q-9 questionnaire for shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis: item response theory modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.用于多发性硬化症共同决策的SDM-Q-9问卷的心理测量特性:项目反应理论建模与验证性因素分析
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Apr 22;15(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0656-2.
7
Psychometric Properties of the 9-Item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9): Validation of the Italian Version in a Large Psychiatric Clinical Sample.9项共同决策问卷(SDM-Q-9)的心理测量特性:意大利语版本在大型精神科临床样本中的验证
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2022 Aug;19(4):264-271. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20220408.
8
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the LMC Skills, Confidence & Preparedness Index (SCPI) in patients with type 2 diabetes.中文版 LMC 技能、信心和准备度指数(SCPI)在 2 型糖尿病患者中的信度和效度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jan 20;19(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01664-x.
9
Cross-cultural adaption and validation of simplified Chinese version of the lower extremity function scale in patients with knee osteoarthritis.膝关节骨关节炎患者下肢功能量表中文版的跨文化调适与验证
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Oct;39(10):3041-3048. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05077-5. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
10
Shared decision-making in healthcare: development and assessment of the translated Finnish version of the SDM-Q-9.医疗保健中的共同决策:SDM-Q-9芬兰语翻译版本的开发与评估
Scand J Public Health. 2024 Aug 1:14034948241255181. doi: 10.1177/14034948241255181.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity and reliability of the brief form of the normative male alexithymia scale among Chinese patients after radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后中国患者中简版男性述情障碍常模量表的效度和信度
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 3;15(1):719. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82958-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Who decides? Shared decision-making among colorectal cancer surgery patients in China.谁来决定?中国结直肠癌手术患者的共同决策。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Nov;28(11):5353-5361. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05391-3. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
2
Shared decision making for men facing prostate cancer treatment: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.面临前列腺癌治疗的男性的共同决策:随机对照试验的系统评价
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Jul 17;13:1153-1174. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S202034. eCollection 2019.
3
[Reliability and validity for Chinese version of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire].
《9项共同决策问卷中文版的信效度研究》
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019 Jul 28;44(7):823-829. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2019.180316.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation.患者自评肘部评估土耳其语版的跨文化调适、效度和信度。
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Nov;38(11):3289-3295. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04665-4. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
5
Effectiveness of Shared Decision-Making for Elderly Depressed Minority Primary Care Patients.共同决策对老年抑郁少数族裔初级保健患者的有效性。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;27(8):883-893. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.02.016. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
6
Shared decision-making experienced by Canadians facing health care decisions: a Web-based survey.面临医疗保健决策的加拿大人所经历的共同决策:一项基于网络的调查。
CMAJ Open. 2019 Apr 4;7(2):E210-E216. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180202. Print 2019 Apr-Jun.
7
Cross-cultural validation of the Student Nurse Stress Index Scale: A descriptive survey targeting student nurses in China.跨文化验证《护生压力量表》:针对中国护生的描述性调查。
J Affect Disord. 2019 May 15;251:31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.03.017. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
8
The impact of pre-existing cancer on survival of prostate cancer patients: A population-based study.既往癌症对前列腺癌患者生存的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(50):e13479. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013479.
9
Shared decision-making within goal-setting in rehabilitation: a mixed-methods study.康复目标设定中的共同决策:一项混合方法研究。
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Mar;33(3):564-574. doi: 10.1177/0269215518815251. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
10
Epidemiology of prostate cancer in Asian countries.亚洲国家前列腺癌的流行病学
Int J Urol. 2018 Jun;25(6):524-531. doi: 10.1111/iju.13593. Epub 2018 May 8.