Giovannoli Jasmine, Martella Diana, Federico Francesca, Pirchio Sabine, Casagrande Maria
Dipartimento di Psicologia, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy.
Instituto de Estudios Sociales y Humanísticos, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 6;11:574789. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574789. eCollection 2020.
Approximately half of the world's population is bilingual or multilingual. The bilingual advantage theory claims that the constant need to control both known languages, that are always active in the brain, to use the one suitable for each specific context improves cognitive functions and specifically executive functions. However, some authors do not agree on the bilingual effect, given the controversial results of studies on this topic. This systematic review aims to summarize the results of studies on the relationship between bilingualism and executive functions. The review was conducted according to PRISMA-statement through searches in the scientific database PsychINFO, PsycARTICLES, MEDLINE, and PUBMED. Studies included in this review had at least one bilingual and monolingual group, participants aged between 5 and 17 years, and at least one executive function measure. Studies on second language learners, multilingual people, and the clinical population were excluded. Fifty-three studies were included in the systematic review. Evidence supporting the bilingual effect seems to appear when assessing inhibition and cognitive flexibility, but to disappear when working memory is considered. The inconsistent results of the studies do not allow drawing definite conclusions on the bilingual effect. Further studies are needed; they should consider the role of some modulators (e.g., language history and context, methodological differences) on the observed results.
世界上大约一半的人口具备双语或多语能力。双语优势理论认为,大脑中始终活跃的两种已知语言需要持续进行管控,以便在每个特定情境中使用适合的那一种语言,这会改善认知功能,尤其是执行功能。然而,鉴于关于这一主题的研究结果存在争议,一些作者并不认同双语效应。本系统综述旨在总结双语能力与执行功能之间关系的研究结果。该综述依据PRISMA声明,通过在科学数据库PsychINFO、PsycARTICLES、MEDLINE和PUBMED中进行检索来开展。本综述纳入的研究至少有一个双语组和一个单语组,参与者年龄在5至17岁之间,且至少有一项执行功能测量指标。关于第二语言学习者、多语者和临床人群的研究被排除在外。共有53项研究被纳入该系统综述。在评估抑制能力和认知灵活性时,支持双语效应的证据似乎会出现,但在考虑工作记忆时则会消失。研究结果的不一致使得无法就双语效应得出明确结论。还需要进一步的研究;这些研究应考虑一些调节因素(如语言历史和背景、方法学差异)对观察结果的作用。